Please wait a minute...
Acta Metall Sin  2025, Vol. 61 Issue (8): 1129-1140    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2023.00220
Research paper Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Microstructure Evolution and Mechanical Properties of 6061 Aluminum Alloy Fabricated by Friction Stir Additive Manufacturing
YANG Fan, PEI Shichao, LUO Xinrui, CHEN Yuxiang, LI Ningyu, CHANG Yongqin()
School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
Cite this article: 

YANG Fan, PEI Shichao, LUO Xinrui, CHEN Yuxiang, LI Ningyu, CHANG Yongqin. Microstructure Evolution and Mechanical Properties of 6061 Aluminum Alloy Fabricated by Friction Stir Additive Manufacturing. Acta Metall Sin, 2025, 61(8): 1129-1140.

Download:  HTML  PDF(4747KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

Friction stir additive manufacturing (FSAM) is an advanced solid-phase forming technology based on the principle of friction stir. As no heat source is required, the FSAM process can avoid metallurgical defects during melting and solidification of the material. The FSAM also conserves energy and protects the environment. To replace the traditional forming technology with a heat source, current research aims to optimize the forming process parameters of aluminum and magnesium alloys. Similarly to the friction stir welding process, increasing the temperature in the FSAM process will dissolve part of the strengthening phase, coarsening the particles and softening the welding core area. In addition, during layer-by-layer stacking in FSAM, the stir tool will re-stir the previously formed area, introducing a new thermal cycle during the stirring process. Because the changes in the temperature and stress field are more complex in the FSAM process than in the friction stir welding process, the influence of microstructure evolution on the mechanical properties of materials in the FSAM process is worthy of investigation. In this study, a multilayer defect-free FSAM material was fabricated from 2-mm-thick 6061 aluminum alloy sheets. The microstructural evolution along the building direction was observed during the FSAM process to investigate its effect on the microhardness and tensile properties. Dynamic crystallization formed fine equiaxed grains in the stir zone, which were further refined after re-stirring in the overlapping interface regions. The tensile strength and elongation of the FSAM material were 47.7%-55.2% and 144.6%-148.8% those of the base material, respectively. Multiple thermal cycling weakens the performance of the overlapping interface regions. The spherical α-Al(MnCrFe)Si phase plays a strengthening role in the matrix. Extensive dissolution of the strengthening phase during the FSAM process is mainly responsible for the performance deterioration of the FSAM material. After heat treatment at 520 oC for 1 h and at 165 oC for 18 h of aging, the properties of the FSAM material were largely improved: the hardness slightly increased from that of the base material and the tensile strength reached 87.2%-91.9% that of the base material.

Key words:  friction stir additive manufacturing      Al-Si-Mg-Cu alloy      post-weld heat treatment      hooking defect      abnormal grain growth     
Received:  12 May 2023     
ZTFLH:  TG453.9  
Fund: National Natural Science Foundation of China(11775017);National Natural Science Foundation of China(51971021)
Corresponding Authors:  CHANG Yongqin, professor, Tel: 13522569036, E-mail: chang@ustb.edu.cn

URL: 

https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/10.11900/0412.1961.2023.00220     OR     https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/Y2025/V61/I8/1129

Fig.1  Photograph of the stir tool (unit: mm) (a) and schematic of friction stir additive manufacturing (FSAM) process (b)
Fig.2  Tensile specimen dimension of formed part (unit: mm) (a) and schematic of sampling location of the tensile specimen (b)
Fig.3  Cross-sectional OM images of the 6061 aluminum alloy fabricated by FSAM
(a) the overall morphology
(b) advancing side (AS) (c) retreating side (RS)
(d) hooking defects in AS (e) hooking defects in RS
Fig.4  Sampling positions for the EBSD observation
Fig.5  Inverse pole figures (IPFs) (a-d) and grain boundary maps (e-h) of 6061 aluminum alloy base metal (BM) and the FSAM samples at different locations shown in Fig.4 (The red lines and blue lines denote low angle grain boundaries (LAGBs) with misorientation angle (θ) 2°-15° and the high angle grain boundaries (HAGBs) with θ ≥ 15°, respectively)
(a, e) BM (b, f) FSAM-1 (c, g) FSAM-2 (d, h) FSAM-3
PositionNumber fraction / %

Grain size

μm

2° ≤ θ <15°θ ≥ 15°
BM62.937.120.7 ± 9.6
FSAM-134.565.55.1 ± 2.3
FSAM-228.271.82.6 ± 1.5
FSAM-323.376.72.1 ± 0.8
Table 1  Average grain sizes and number fractions of LAGBs and HAGBs in 6061 aluminum alloy BM and the different locations shown in Fig.3a
Fig.6  Orientation distribution function (ODF) maps and texture distributions (Black dots in Figs.6a1-a4 and b1-b4 corres-pond to the positions of the textures in Figs.6c and d, respectively)
(a1-a4) ODF maps for BM (a1), FSAM-1 (a2), FSAM-2 (a3), and FSAM-3 (a4) at Euler angle φ2 = 0° (b1-b4) ODF maps for BM (b1), FSAM-1 (b2), FSAM-2 (b3), and FSAM-3 (b4) at φ2 = 45° (c) texture at φ2 = 0° (Φ, φ1—Euler angles) (d) texture at φ2 = 45°
Fig.7  Hardness distributions of the 6061 aluminum alloy fabricated by FSAM (Insets show the position and direction of hardness test sample, Z—distance between the test position and the upper surface of the sample)
(a) building direction (b) vertical building direction
Fig.8  Hardness distributions of the 6061 aluminum alloy fabricated by FSAM and followed by post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) along building direction (a) and PWHT sample along vertical building direction (b) (Inset in Fig.8b shows the position and direction of hardness test sample)
Fig.9  Engineering stress-strain curves of 6061 aluminum alloy samples in different states
(a) FSAM (b) PWHT
SampleUTS / MPaYS / MPaEL / %
BM344.8276.916.8
FSAW-top190.599.724.9
FSAW-middle165.295.325.0
FSAW-bottom164.490.024.3
PWHT-top317.0277.810.8
PWHT-middle300.7230.517.1
PWHT-bottom306.5267.713.0
Table 2  Tensile properties of 6061 aluminum alloy samples in different states
Fig.10  OM images of the 6061 aluminum alloy BM (a) and 6061 aluminum alloy fabricated by FSAM followed by PWHT (b)
Fig.11  TEM bright field images of the 6061 aluminum alloy BM (a), 6061 aluminum alloy fabricated by FSAM (b), and then followed by PWHT (c)
Fig.12  Particle size distributions (a) and average diameters and number densities of precipitates (b) for 6061 aluinum alloy BM, 6061 aluminum alloy fabricated by FSAM, and then followed by PWHT
Fig.13  High-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) image (a) and corresponding EDS element distribution maps of Fe (b), Cr (c), Mn (d), Al (e), Si (f), Mg (g), and Cu (h) for 6061 aluminum alloy fabricated by FSAM followed by PWHT
Fig.14  TEM image (a) and EDS analysis results of precipitated phases P1 (b) and P2 (c) in Fig.14a for 6061 aluminum alloy fabricated by FSAM followed by PWHT
Fig.15  TEM bright field images and corresponding selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns (insets) of rod-like (a) and spherical (b) precipitates for 6061 aluminum alloy fabricated by FSAM followed by PWHT
Fig.16  SEM images of macroscopic morphology (insets) and microstructure of tensile fracture for 6061 aluminum alloy BM (a), 6061 aluminum alloy fabricated by FSAM (b), and then followed by PWHT (c)
[1] Altıparmak S C, Yardley V A, Shi Z S, et al. Challenges in additive manufacturing of high-strength aluminium alloys and current developments in hybrid additive manufacturing [J]. Int. J. Lightweight Mater. Manuf., 2021, 4: 246
[2] Mishra A, Agarwal R, Kumar N, et al. A critical review on the additive manufacturing of aluminium alloys [J]. Mater. Today: Proc., 2021, 47: 4074
[3] Kim S, Moon S K. A part consolidation design method for additive manufacturing based on product disassembly complexity [J]. Appl. Sci. (Basel), 2020, 10: 1100
[4] Karayel E, Bozkurt Y. Additive manufacturing method and different welding applications [J]. J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2020, 9: 11424
doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.08.039
[5] He P F, Wei Z Y, Wang Y C, et al. A novel droplet + arc additive manufacturing for aluminum alloy: Method, microstructure and mechanical properties [J]. Addit. Manuf., 2023, 61: 103356
[6] Xiao Y C, Li Y, Shi L, et al. Experimental and numerical analysis of friction stir additive manufacturing of 2024 aluminium alloy [J]. Mater. Today Commun., 2023, 35: 105639
[7] Carroll B E, Otis R A, Borgonia J P, et al. Functionally graded material of 304L stainless steel and Inconel 625 fabricated by directed energy deposition: Characterization and thermodynamic modeling [J]. Acta Mater., 2016, 108: 46
[8] Khodabakhshi F, Gerlich A P. Potentials and strategies of solid-state additive friction-stir manufacturing technology: A critical review [J]. J. Manuf. Process., 2018, 36: 77
[9] Rometsch P A, Zhu Y M, Wu X H, et al. Review of high-strength aluminium alloys for additive manufacturing by laser powder bed fusion [J]. Mater. Des., 2022, 219: 110779
[10] Hauser T, Reisch R T, Breese P P, et al. Porosity in wire arc additive manufacturing of aluminium alloys [J]. Addit. Manuf., 2021, 41: 101993
[11] Ahmad Z. Aluminium Alloys—New Trends in Fabrication and Applications [M]. Rijeka Croatia: IntechOpen, 2012: 159
[12] Li H Z, Wang C M, Zhang H, et al. Research progress of friction stir additive manufacturing technology [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2023, 59: 106
doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2022.00436
李会朝, 王彩妹, 张 华 等. 搅拌摩擦增材制造技术研究进展 [J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59: 106
doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2022.00436
[13] Mao Y Q, Ke L M, Huang C P, et al. Formation characteristic, microstructure, and mechanical performances of aluminum-based components by friction stir additive manufacturing [J]. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2016, 83: 1637
[14] Palanivel S, Nelaturu P, Glass B, et al. Friction stir additive manufacturing for high structural performance through microstructural control in an Mg based WE43 alloy [J]. Mater. Des., 2015, 65: 934
[15] Li Y, He C S, Wei J X, et al. Correlation of local microstructures and mechanical properties of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy build fabricated via underwater friction stir additive manufacturing [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2021, A805: 140590
[16] Liu F J, Fu L, Chen H Y. Microstructures and mechanical properties of thin plate aluminium alloy joint prepared by high rotational speed friction stir welding [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2017, 53: 1651
doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2017.00025
刘奋军, 傅 莉, 陈海燕. 铝合金薄板高转速搅拌摩擦焊接头组织与力学性能 [J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53: 1651
doi: 10.11900/0412.1961.2017.00025
[17] Gussev M N, Sridharan N, Norfolk M, et al. Effect of post weld heat treatment on the 6061 aluminum alloy produced by ultrasonic additive manufacturing [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2017, A684: 606
[18] Nie F H, Dong H G, Chen S, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of pulse MIG welded 6061/A356 aluminum alloy dissimilar butt joints [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2018, 34: 551
doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2016.11.004
[19] Zhang Z, Tan Z J, Li J Y, et al. Experimental and numerical studies of re-stirring and re-heating effects on mechanical properties in friction stir additive manufacturing [J]. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2019, 104: 767
[20] Malopheyev S, Vysotskiy I, Kulitskiy V, et al. Optimization of processing-microstructure-properties relationship in friction-stir welded 6061-T6 aluminum alloy [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2016, A662: 136
[21] Li J Y, Kong S N, Liu C K, et al. Chemical composition effect on microstructures and mechanical properties in friction stir additive manufacturing [J]. Acta. Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.), 2022, 35: 1494
[22] Zhao Z J, Yang X Q, Li S L, et al. Interfacial bonding features of friction stir additive manufactured build for 2195-T8 aluminum-lithium alloy [J]. J. Manuf. Process., 2019, 38: 396
[23] Yin Y H, Sun N, North T H, et al. Hook formation and mechanical properties in AZ31 friction stir spot welds [J]. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2010, 210: 2062
[24] Zhang C C, Chang B H, Tao J, et al. Microstructure evolution during friction stir welding of 2024 aluminum alloy [J]. Trans. China Weld. Inst., 2013, 34(3): 57
张成聪, 常保华, 陶 军 等. 2024铝合金搅拌摩擦焊过程组织演化分析 [J]. 焊接学报, 2013, 34(3): 57
[25] He P D, Webster R F, Yakubov V, et al. Fatigue and dynamic aging behavior of a high strength Al-5024 alloy fabricated by laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing [J]. Acta Mater., 2021, 220: 117312
[26] Lodgaard L, Ryum N. Precipitation of dispersoids containing Mn and/or Cr in Al-Mg-Si alloys [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2000, A283: 144
[27] Kalinenko A, Vysotskii I, Malopheyev S, et al. Relationship between welding conditions, abnormal grain growth and mechanical performance in friction-stir welded 6061-T6 aluminum alloy [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2021, A817: 141409
[28] Zhang L, Jiao W L, Wei H J, et al. Influence of manganese and pre-heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-Si alloy [J]. Chin. J. Nonferrous Met., 2005, 15: 368
张 磊, 焦万丽, 尉海军 等. 锰结合预先热处理对铝硅合金中富铁相组织和力学性能的影响 [J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2005, 15: 368
[1] DI Xinjie, XING Xixue, WANG Baosen. NUCLEATION AND COARSENING MECHANISM OF δ PHASE IN INCONEL 625 DEPOSITED METAL[J]. 金属学报, 2014, 50(3): 323-328.
[2] ZHAO Zhihao, XU Zhen, WANG Gaosong, CUI Jianzhong. MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROPERTY OF WELDING JOINT WELD WITH MICRO-ALLOYING 4043 WELDING WIRE[J]. 金属学报, 2013, 49(8): 946-952.
[3] HAN Lizhan CHEN Ruikai GU Jianfeng PAN Jiansheng. BEHAVIOR OF AUSTENITE GRAIN GROWTH IN X12CrMoWVNbN10-1-1 FERRITE HEAT-RESISTANT STEEL[J]. 金属学报, 2009, 45(12): 1446-1450.
No Suggested Reading articles found!