热镀Zn-0.2%Al镀层中Fe-Al抑制层失稳机理及其热力学评估*
收稿日期: 2015-07-24
网络出版日期: 2016-05-25
基金资助
*国际铅锌研究组织资助项目ILZRO/IZA/CN201212, 广东省教育部产学研结合项目2012B091100312和中央高校基本科研业务费项目2012ZM0011资助
DESTABILIZATION MECHANISM OF Fe-Al INHIBITION LAYER IN Zn-0.2%Al HOT-DIP GALVANIZING COATING AND RELATED THERMODYNAMIC EVALUATION
Received date: 2015-07-24
Online published: 2016-05-25
Supported by
Supported by International Lead and Zinc Research Organization Funded Projects (No.ILZRO/IZA/CN201212), Project on the Integration of Industry, Education and Research of Guangdong Province (No.2012B091100312) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (No.2012ZM0011)
在450 ℃镀锌条件下, 锌浴中加入质量分数为0.2%的Al, 采用SEM观察镀层的结构特征, 利用EDS定量分析相的微区成分, 利用其线扫描和面扫描定性分析镀层截面元素变化情况. 借助Miedema模型和Toop模型, 计算了镀层中各二元Fe-Al, Fe-Zn和三元Fe2Al5Znx (η)金属间化合物(IMC)的热力学值, 分析了随镀锌时间的延长, 出现Fe2Al5抑制层失稳破坏而产生Fe-Zn反应的根本原因. 结果表明, 因为Fe-Al IMC比Fe-Zn IMC具有更稳定的热力学性质, 钢基体与锌浴界面优先产生连续的Fe2Al5金属间化合物抑制层, 抑制Fe-Zn反应, 但随镀锌时间的延长, Fe2Al5的失稳破坏丧失对Fe-Zn反应的抑制作用, 生成FeZn10 (δ)相. Fe2Al5抑制层的失稳机制有两种: 一种是Fe2Al5/锌浴界面处Al的局部贫化导致Zn对Fe2Al5的侵蚀, 形成Fe2Al5Znx, 造成系统热力学稳定性降低, 从而导致Fe2Al5被Zn侵蚀分解, 同时在Fe2Al5/锌浴界面产生FeZn10 (δ)相; 另一种是Zn通过Fe2Al5晶界向钢基体扩散, 直接在Fe2Al5/钢基体界面产生δ相, 并引起Fe2Al5的迸发失稳.
刘力恒 , 车淳山 , 孔纲 , 卢锦堂 , 张双红 . 热镀Zn-0.2%Al镀层中Fe-Al抑制层失稳机理及其热力学评估*[J]. 金属学报, 2016 , 52(5) : 614 -624 . DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2015.00416
The formation of a uniform Fe-Al inhibition layer with a proper thickness at steel interface during continuous hot-dip galvanizing process is a crucial issue for industrial production. The inhibition layer prohibits the nucleation and growth of brittle Fe-Zn intermetallic compounds which deteriorate the adhesion of the galvanizing coating and result in an inhomogeneous distribution of the coating. The inhibition layer was identified to be Fe2Al5 with some Zn dissolved in it. But Fe2Al5 inhibition layer was damaged with galvanized time increasing, will lose the inhibition to the Fe-Zn reaction. Nevertheless, there is no systematic and comprehensive investigation the causes of the inhibition layer is damaged. The aim of this work is to clarify the destabilization mechanism of Fe2Al5 inhibition layer. In the present study, the mass fraction of 0.2%Al was added into the zinc bath at 450 ℃ for hot-dip galvanizing. SEM was used to observe the structure characteristics of the hot-dip galvanized coating. EDS was used to quantitatively analyze the micro area components of phases and also used its line scan and mapping scan to qualitatively analyze the element change of the coating cross section. By means of the Miedema model and the Toop model, the thermodynamic values of the binary Fe-Al, Fe-Zn and ternary Fe2Al5Znx (η) intermetallic compounds (IMC) in the coatings were calculated. The fundamental reason for the Fe-Zn reaction caused by Fe2Al5 destabilization with galvanized time increasing was analyzed. The results show that because Fe-Al IMC which is generate preferentially had more stable thermodynamic property than Fe-Zn IMC, the continuous Fe2Al5 intermetallic compound inhibition layer was produced preferentially at steel and zinc bath interface which inhibit the Fe-Zn reaction. However, with the galvanized time increasing, Fe2Al5 destabilization which led to the loss of inhibitory effect of Fe-Zn reaction and produced FeZn10 (δ) . There are two kinds of destabilization mechanism of Fe2Al5 inhibition layer, one is that the local depletion of Al at Fe2Al5 and zinc bath interface result in erosion of Fe2Al5 by Zn and the formed Fe2Al5Znx caused the decrease of the systematic thermodynamic stability which led to erosion and decomposition of Fe2Al5 by Zn. At the same time, FeZn10 (δ) phase was produced between the Fe2Al5 and zinc bath interface. The phase transformation process can be described as: Fe2Al5→η→L+η→L+η+δ→L+δ. The other kind of destabilization mechanism is Zn diffused to the steel substrate by Fe2Al5 grain boundaries and directly produced δ phase between Fe2Al5 and steel substrate interface, which caused outburst of Fe2Al5. The two kinds of Fe2Al5 destabilization mechanism are mutual coexistence and mutual competition, in particular conditions may be a mechanism to occupy absolute advantage.
Key words: hot dip galvanized; Fe2Al5; IMC; thermodynamics; Miedema model; Toop model
| [1] | Marder A R.Prog Mater Sci, 2000; 45: 191 |
| [2] | Shao D W, He Z R, Zhang Y H, He Y.Hot Working Technol, 2012; 41: 122 |
| [2] | (邵大伟, 贺志荣, 张永宏, 何应. 热加工工艺, 2012; 41: 122) |
| [3] | Dionne S.JOM-US, 2006; 58(3): 32 |
| [4] | Wang Y, Xing J D, Ma S Q, Liu G Z, Fu H G, Jia S.J Mater Eng Perform, 2015; 24: 2444 |
| [5] | Kim Y, Shin K S, Jeon S H, Chin K G, Lee J.Corros Sci, 2014; 85: 364 |
| [6] | Harvey G J, Mercer P D.Metall Trans, 1973; 4: 619 |
| [7] | Bélisle S, Lezon V, Gagné M.J Phase Equilib Diff, 1991; 12: 259 |
| [8] | Zhao J T.J Xiamen Univ (Nat Sci), 1996; 35: 532 |
| [8] | (赵景泰. 厦门大学学报(自然科学版), 1996; 35: 532) |
| [9] | Campos C A, Guerrero-Mata M P, Colas R, Garza R.ISIJ Int, 2002; 42: 876 |
| [10] | Furdanowicz V, Shastry C R.Metall Mater Trans, 1999; 30A: 3031 |
| [11] | Zhang C H, Huang S, Shen J, Chen N X, Zhang C H, Huang S. Intermetallics, 2014; 52: 86 |
| [12] | Tang N Y.Metall Mater Trans, 1995; 26A: 1699 |
| [13] | Wakamatsu Y, Noguchi T, Yamane M, Noguchi F. Tetsu Hagané, 2001; 87: 138 |
| [13] | (若松良徳, 野口敬広, 山根政博, 野口文男.铁と钢, 2001; 87: 138) |
| [14] | Yin F C, Zhao M X, Liu Y X, Han W T.Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, 2013; 23: 556 |
| [15] | Wang K K, Hsu C W, Chang L, Gan D, Yang K C.Appl Surf Sci, 2013; 285: 458 |
| [16] | Tan P, Chen J M, Tang H P, Wang J Y, Wang J, Yang B J, Li Y N.J Func Mater, 2012; 43: 29 |
| [17] | Adachi Y, Arai M.Mater Sci Eng, 1998; A254: 305 |
| [18] | Jordan C E, Marder A R.J Mater Sci, 1997; 32: 5603 |
| [19] | Wang K K, Hsu C W, Chang L, Gan D, Yang K C.Appl Surf Sci, 2013; 285: 458 |
| [20] | Prabhudev S, Swaminathan S, Rohwerder M.Corros Sci, 2011; 53: 2413 |
| [21] | Inagaki J, Sakurai M, Watanabe T.Tetsu Hagané, 1993; 79: 1273 |
| [21] | (稲垣淳一, 櫻井理孝, 渡辺豊文.铁と钢, 1993; 79: 1273) |
| [22] | Kato T, Nunome K, Kaneko K, Saka H. Acta Mater, 2000; 48: 2257 |
| [23] | Sun W X, Yan D R, Chen X G, Dong Y C, Li X Z.Acta Phys Sin, 2010; 59: 2228 |
| [23] | (孙文秀, 阎殿然, 陈学广, 董艳春, 李香芝. 物理学报, 2010; 59: 2228) |
| [24] | Kato C, Koumura H, Mochizuki K, Morito N. US Pat,80106, 1995 |
| [25] | Miedema A R, Niessen A K, Deboer F R, Boom R, Matten W C.Cohesion in Metals: Transition Metal Alloys. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co., 1989: 38 |
| [26] | Zhang R F, Rajan K.Chem Phys Lett, 2014; 612: 177 |
| [27] | Ding X Y, Fan P, Han Q Y.Acta Metall Sin, 1994; 30: 49 |
| [27] | (丁学勇, 范鹏, 韩其勇. 金属学报, 1994; 30: 49) |
| [28] | Dragan M, Dragana Z, Katayama I.J Serb Chem Soc, 2005; 70: 9 |
| [29] | Bo S, Ohnuma I, Dupin N, Kattner U R, Fries S G.Acta Mater, 2009; 57: 2896 |
| [30] | Wo?czyński W, Pogoda Z, Garze? G, Kucharska B, Sypień A, Okane T.Arch Metall Mater, 2014; 59: 1223 |
| [31] | Yoshitaka A, Masahiro A.Mater Sci Eng, 1998; A254: 305 |
| [32] | Raghavan V.J Phase Equilib Diff, 2003; 24: 546 |
| [33] | Su X P, Li Z, Yin F C, He Y H, Pan S W.Acta Metall Sin, 2008; 44: 718 |
| [33] | (苏旭平, 李智, 尹付成, 贺跃辉, 潘世文. 金属学报, 2008; 44: 718) |
| [34] | Fu X C, Shen W X, Yao T Y, Hou W H. Physical Chemistry. Vol.II, 5th Ed., Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2004: 253 |
| [34] | (傅献彩, 沈文霞, 姚天扬, 候文华. 物理化学(下). 第五版, 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2004: 253) |
| [35] | Tanaka T, Gokcen N A, Morita Z.Z Metallkd, 1990; 81(1): 49 |
| [36] | Jiang Z H, Liu Y, Li Y, Liang L K.J Northeastern Univ (Nat Sci), 2005; 26: 252 |
| [36] | (姜周华, 刘杨, 李阳, 梁连科. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2005; 26: 252) |
| [37] | Le Q Z, Cui J Z.Acta Metall Sin, 2006; 42: 1182 |
| [37] | (乐启炽, 崔建忠. 金属学报, 2006; 42: 1182) |
| [38] | Sun S P, Yi D Q, Zang B.Rare Met Mater Eng, 2010; 39: 1974 |
| [38] | (孙顺平, 易丹青, 臧冰. 稀有金属材料与工程, 2010; 39: 1974) |
| [39] | Yan D, He J, Tian B, Dong Y, Li X, Zhang J.Surf Coat Technol, 2006; 201: 2662 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |