论文

微量Fe对冷轧超细晶Cu-30Zn-0.15Fe合金等温退火组织演化的影响*

  • 张笃秀 ,
  • 李祎 ,
  • 叶友雄 ,
  • 沈阳志 ,
  • 杨续跃
展开
  • 1 中南大学材料科学与工程学院, 长沙 410083
    2 中南大学有色金属先进结构材料与制造协同创新中心, 长沙 410083

收稿日期: 2015-06-09

  网络出版日期: 2016-03-17

基金资助

* 国家自然科学基金资助项目51174234

EFFECT OF MINOR Fe ADDITION ON MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION OF ULTRAFINE GRAINED COLDROLLING Cu-30Zn-0.15Fe ALLOY SUBJECTED TO ISOTHERMAL ANNEALING

  • Duxiu ZHANG ,
  • Yi LI ,
  • Youxiong YE ,
  • Yangzhi SHEN ,
  • Xuyue YANG
Expand
  • 1 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
    2 Nonferrous Metal Oriented Advanced Structural Materials and Manufacturing Cooperative Innovation Center, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

Received date: 2015-06-09

  Online published: 2016-03-17

Supported by

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51174234)

摘要

采用OM, TEM, SEM/EBSD及硬度测试等手段, 研究了微量Fe对冷轧Cu-30Zn-0.15Fe合金在573 K下等温退火过程中组织演化的影响. 结果表明, Fe与合金中的杂质P形成hcp结构的Fe2P第二相颗粒, 其粒子尺寸为50~300 nm. 冷轧Cu-Zn和Cu-Zn-Fe合金的硬度曲线在退火过程中均分为3个阶段, 后者与前者相比第二阶段出现较晚. 当硬度趋于稳定时, Cu-Zn-Fe合金的硬度比Cu-Zn合金提高约30 HV. Fe2P粒子阻碍晶界迁移和位错运动, 使得Cu-Zn-Fe合金退火过程中的Σ3孪晶界的增加速度缓慢,质量分数减少, 组织内位错密度,储能较大. Fe2P粒子延迟了Cu-Zn-Fe合金再结晶的发生并抑制再结晶晶粒长大, 使其平均晶粒尺寸保持在1.3 μm左右. 合金的主要强化机制为第二相强化,细晶强化和位错强化.

本文引用格式

张笃秀 , 李祎 , 叶友雄 , 沈阳志 , 杨续跃 . 微量Fe对冷轧超细晶Cu-30Zn-0.15Fe合金等温退火组织演化的影响*[J]. 金属学报, 2016 , 52(3) : 369 -377 . DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2015.00303

Abstract

Cu-Zn alloys are one of the most commercially important metallic materials because of their excellent physical and mechanical properties, ease of fabrication and low cost. Ultrafine grained (UFG) metallic materials intrigue great interest due to their high strength, and most UFG materials are produced by severe plastic deformation (SPD). However, utilizing SPD to produce UFG materials needs large strain. Moreover, most UFG alloys produced by SPD have limited thermal stability and ductility which restrict the application in practical production. In this work, a UFG Cu-30Zn-0.15Fe alloy with good comprehensive properties and high thermal stability was prepared. Effect of minor Fe addition on the microstructure evolution of UFG Cu-Zn-Fe alloy subjected to cold rolling and subsequent isothermal annealing at 573 K was investigated through OM, TEM and SEM/EBSD observations. The results show that second phase particles are introduced into Cu-Zn-Fe alloy with trace P element by Fe addition. The second phase particles are identified as hcp structured Fe2P phase with diameters ranging at 50~300 nm. The hardness-annealing time curves of Cu-30Zn and Cu-30Zn-0.15Fe alloys have three stages, corresponding respectively to recovery, recrystallization and recrystallized grains growth. It takes longer time for Cu-Zn-Fe alloy to get recrystallization started; after fully annealed, the hardness of Cu-Zn-Fe alloy is much higher, with 30 HV increment than that of Cu-Zn alloy. The UFG Cu-Zn-Fe alloy has highly stable average grain size of 1.3 μm during the process of annealing, which results from Fe2P particles suppressing the growth of recrystallized grains. The Fe2P particles retard grain boundary migration and dislocation movement, resulting in less mass fraction of Σ3 twin boundaries, lower increasing speed, higher dislocation density and local stored energy. The main strengthening mechanisms for present UFG Cu-Zn-Fe alloy are second phase strengthening, fine-grain strengthening and dislocation strengthening.

参考文献

[1] Peter L V, Liao X Z, Zhao Y H, Zhu Y T, Maxim M Y, Enrique L J, Valiev R Z, Ringer S P.Nat Commun, 2010; 1: 63
[2] Zhao Y H, Liao X Z, Jin Z, Valiev R Z, Zhu Y T.Acta Mater, 2004; 15: 4589
[3] Valiev R Z, Enikeev N A, Murashkin M Y, Kazykhanov V U, Sauvage X.Scr Mater, 2010; 9: 949
[4] Valiev R Z, Islamgaliev R K, Alexandrov I V.Prog Mater Sci, 2000; 45: 103
[5] Humphreys F J, Hatherly M.Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena. 2nd Ed., Oxford: Pergamon Press, 2004: 451
[6] An X H, Lin Q Y, Wu S D, Zhang Z F, Figueiredo R B, Gao N, Langdon T G.Scr Mater, 2011; 64: 954
[7] Wu S D, An X H, Han W Z, Qu S, Zhang Z F.Acta Metall Sin, 2010; 46: 257
[7] (吴世丁, 安祥海, 韩卫忠, 屈伸, 张哲峰. 金属学报, 2010; 46: 257)
[8] Gong Y L, Wen C E, Li Y C, Wu X X, Cheng L P, Han X C, Zhu X K.Mater Sci Eng, 2013; A569: 144
[9] Zhao Y H, Liao X Z, Horita Z, Langdon T G, Zhu Y T.Mater Sci Eng, 2008; A493: 123
[10] Jiang Q W, Liu Y, Wang Y, Chao Y S, Li X W.Acta Metall Sin, 2009; 45: 873
[10] (姜庆伟, 刘印, 王尧, 晁月盛, 李小武. 金属学报, 2009; 45: 873)
[11] Molodova X, Gottstein G, Winning M, Hellmig R J.Mater Sci Eng, 2007; A460: 204
[12] Ye Y X, Yang X Y, Liu C Z, Shen Y Z, Zhang X K, Sakai T.Mater Sci Eng, 2014; A612: 246
[13] Carlsson B, Gölin M, Rundqvist.J Solid State Chem, 1973; 1: 57
[14] Bader M, Eldis G T, Warlimont H.Metall Trans, 1976; 2A: 249
[15] Konkova T, Mironov S, Korznikov A, Myshlyaev M M, Semiatin S L.Mater Sci Eng, 2013; A585: 178
[16] Mahajan S, Pande C S, Imam M M, Rath B.Acta Mater, 1997; 6: 2633
[17] Wright S I, Nowell M M, David F P.Microsc Microanal, 2011; 3: 316
[18] Takayama Y, Szpunar J A.Mater Trans, 2004; 7: 2316
[19] Dong Q Y, Shen L N, Cao F, Jia Y L, Wang M P.Acta Metall Sin, 2014; 10: 1224
[19] (董琦祎, 申镭诺, 曹峰, 贾延琳, 汪明朴. 金属学报, 2014; 10: 1224)
[20] Correia J B, Davies H A, Sellars C M.Acta Mater, 1997; 45: 177
[21] Wen H M, Topping T D, Dieter I, David S N, Enrique L J.Acta Mater, 2013; 61: 2769
[22] Brown L M, Ham R K.Strengthening Methods in Crystals. London: Elsevier, 1971: 10
[23] Balogh L, Ungar T, Zhao Y H, Zhu Y T, Horita Z J, Xu C, Langdon T G.Acta Mater, 2008; 56: 809
[24] Chen X H, Lu L, Lu K.Scr Mater, 2011; 64: 311
[25] Kamikawa N, Huang X X, Tsuji N, Hansen N.Acta Mater, 2009; 57: 4198
文章导航

/