In3+掺杂CeO2的固溶度及其储氧能力*
收稿日期: 2015-10-08
网络出版日期: 2015-11-11
基金资助
*国家自然科学基金资助项目51372006
SOLID SOLUBILITY AND OXYGEN STORAGE CAPABILITY OF In3+-DOPED CeO2
Received date: 2015-10-08
Online published: 2015-11-11
Supported by
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51372006)
以(CH2OH)2和H2O的混合溶液为溶剂, Ce(NO3)3?6H2O和In(NO3)3?4.5H2O分别为Ce和In源, 采用溶剂热法在200 ℃下合成了前驱体, 再经500 ℃焙烧2 h制备了In3+掺杂的CeO2粉末. 通过研究一系列In3+的添加浓度, 得出In3+掺杂CeO2中In3+的固溶度为1% (摩尔分数). In3+掺杂对CeO2形貌的影响不大, 固溶In3+前后的CeO2颗粒形貌均为层状结构, 但当In3+的添加量高于固溶度时, 出现了细碎的第二相颗粒. In3+饱和掺杂浓度时CeO2粉末的比表面积高于未掺杂的CeO2, 达到100 m2/g, 当In3+的添加量大于等于3%时比表面积有所下降. In3+添加量对储氧能力的影响为: 首先, In3+的引入能够明显降低CeO2的低温还原峰温度; 其次, 当In3+的添加量为饱和浓度1%时, CeO2的低温储氧能力由未掺杂的3.6×10-4 mol/g提高到4.4×10-4 mol/g; 当In3+的浓度大于等于3%时, 试样的低温储氧能力先有所下降, 随后趋于稳定. 不同In3+添加量CeO2粉末的晶格常数、氧空位浓度、比表面积和低温储氧能力都在1% In3+固溶度的位置出现了转折. 低温储氧能力与比表面积和氧空位浓度都有关联, 是二者综合作用的结果.
张世政 , 徐要辉 , 汪庭语 , 李锐星 , 才鸿年 . In3+掺杂CeO2的固溶度及其储氧能力*[J]. 金属学报, 2016 , 52(5) : 607 -613 . DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2015.00516
CeO2 is an important rare earth oxide and can be used in automotive exhaust three-way catalysts on the basis of its oxygen storage capability. Ion doping is an effective method to enhance the oxygen storage capability of CeO2. And when doping a cation whose size is smaller than Ce4+ and valence is lower than +4, it tends to evolve more defects. It is known that defects play important roles in enhancing the oxygen storage capability of CeO2. Therefore, In ion was selected as a dopant cation which matches above two factors of size and valence. In this work, a series of CeO2 with different content of In3+ were synthesized via a two-step process. The precursor was synthesized by a solvothermal method at 200 ℃ using a mixture solvent of (CH2OH)2 and H2O, as well as Ce(NO3)36H2O and In(NO3)3?4.5H2O as Ce and In sources, respectively. CeO2 was obtained after the precursor was calcined at 500 ℃ for 2 h in air. It was found that the solid solubility of In3+ in CeO2 was 1% (molar fraction). The doping of 1%In3+ in CeO2 almost had no impact on the morphology of multilayered structure. However, a second phase of small particles appeared and there were some changes of the morphology of multilayered structure when the concentration of In3+ increased further. The specific surface area of the 1%In3+ solid solution was 100 m2/g, which was th highest among all the samples, and undoped CeO2 (92 m2/g) ranked second. When the content of In3+ was above the solid solubility, i.e., 1%In3+, the specific surface area decreased. The low temperature oxygen storage capability could be improved from 3.6×10-4 mol/g for undoped CeO2 to 4.4×10-4 mol/g for 1%In3+-doped CeO2. When the In3+ content was greater than or equal to 3%, the low temperature oxygen storage capability decreased at the beginning, and then almost no change. Lattice parameter decreased and the concentration of Ce3+ and oxygen vacancy increased by the doping of In3+. Moreover, lattice parameter, the specific surface area, concentration of oxygen vacancy and low temperature oxygen storage capacity could mark a turning point for 1%In3+. It could be found that the low temperature oxygen storage capability was in relation to both the specific surface area and the concentration of oxygen vacancy of CeO2. In addition, the low temperature reduction peaks shifted towards lower temperatures with the addition of In3+.
Key words: CeO2; In3+; doping; oxygen storage capability; solvothermal
| [1] | Mori T, Drennan J, Wang Y, Li J G, Lkegami T.J Therm Anal Calorim, 2002; 70: 309 |
| [2] | Steele B C H.Solid State Ionics, 2000; 129: 95 |
| [3] | Wang Z, Kale G M, Ghadiri M.J Am Ceram Soc, 2012; 95: 2863 |
| [4] | Chen Y, Long R W.Appl Surf Sci, 2011; 257: 8679 |
| [5] | Rajendran A, Takahashi Y, Koyama M, Kubo M, Miyamoto A.Appl Surf Sci, 2005; 244: 34 |
| [6] | Liu X, Shu Y, Sato T.Mater Chem Phys, 2009; 116: 421 |
| [7] | Lin K S, Chowdhury S.Int J Mol Sci, 2010; 11: 3226 |
| [8] | Imamura S, Yamada H, Utani K.Appl Catal, 2000; 192A: 221 |
| [9] | Christou S Y, Efstathiou A M.Top Catal, 2007; 42: 415 |
| [10] | Zhang D S, Du X J, Shi L Y, Gao R H.Dalton Trans, 2012; 41: 14455 |
| [11] | Prasad D H, Ji H I, Kim H R, Son J W, Kim B K, Lee H W, Lee J H.Appl Catal, 2011; 101B: 531 |
| [12] | Reina T R, Ivanova S, Delgado J J, Ivanov I, Idakiev V, Tabakova T, Centeno A M, Odriozola J A.Chemcatchem, 2014; 6: 1401 |
| [13] | Trovarelli A.Catal Rev, 1996; 38: 439 |
| [14] | Ka?par J, Fornasiero P, Graziani M.Catal Today, 1999; 50: 285 |
| [15] | Zhao B, Wang Q Y, Ge C H, Li Q F, Zhou R X.Chin J Catal, 2009; 30: 407 |
| [15] | (赵波, 王秋艳, 葛昌华, 李秋凤, 周仁贤. 催化学报, 2009; 30: 407) |
| [16] | Fei D, Suda A, Tanabe T, Nagai Y, Sobukawa H, Shinjoh H, Sugiura M, Descorme C, Duprez D.Catal Today, 2004; 93: 827 |
| [17] | Ouyang J, Yang H M.J Phys, 2009; 113C: 6921 |
| [18] | Reddy B M, Thrimurthulu G, Katta L.Catal Lett, 2011; 141: 572 |
| [19] | Yuzhakova T, Raki? V, Guimon C, Auroux A.Chem Mater, 2007; 19: 2970 |
| [20] | Li R X, Sato T, Yabe S, Yamashita M, Momose S, Yoshida S, Yin S, Sato T.Solid State Ionics, 2002; 151: 235 |
| [21] | Li R X, Fu C, Li C Q, Yin S, Zhang Y, Sato T.J Ceram Soc Jpn, 2010; 118: 555 |
| [22] | Larachi F, Pierre J, Adnot A, Bernis A.Appl Surf Sci, 2002; 195: 236 |
| [23] | Guo M, Lu J Q, Wu Y N, Wang Y J, Luo M F.Langmuir, 2011; 27: 3872 |
| [24] | Tang X L, Zhang B C, Li Y, Xu Y D, Xin Q, Shen W J.Catal Today, 2004; 93: 191 |
| [25] | Ayastuy J L, Iglesias-Gonzalez A, Gutierrez-Ortiz M A.Chem Eng J, 2014; 244: 372 |
| [26] | Song Z X, Liu W, Nishiguchi H, Takami A, Nagaoka K, Takita Y.Appl Catal, 2007; 329A: 86 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |