热变形和淬火配分处理的复合作用对低碳合金钢马氏体相变机制的影响*

展开
  • 2 大连理工大学汽车工程学院工业装备结构分析国家重点实验室, 大连 116024
    3 长城汽车股份有限公司技术中心, 保定 071000

录用日期: 2015-03-18

  网络出版日期: 2015-04-09

基金资助

* 国家重点基础研究发展计划项目2010CB630803, 国家自然科学基金项目51101036, 51201093和11472072, 中央高校基本科研业务费项目DUT15QY09及辽宁省自然科学基金项目2014028001资助

THE COMBINED EFFECT OF HOT DEFORMATION PLUS QUENCHING AND PARTITIONING TREATMENT ON MARTENSITE TRANSFORMATION OF LOW CARBON ALLOYED STEEL

  • Cunyu WANG ,
  • Ying CHANG ,
  • Jie YANG ,
  • Kunmin ZHAO ,
  • Han DONG
Expand
  • 1 East China Branch of Central Iron & Steel Research Institute, Beijing 100081
    2 State Key Laboratory of Industrial Equipment Structural Analysis, School of Automotive Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024
    3 Technology Center, Great Wall Motor Company Limited, Baoding 071000

Accepted date: 2015-03-18

  Online published: 2015-04-09

Supported by

Supported by National Basic Research Program of China (No.2010CB630803), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.51101036, 51201093 and 11472072), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.DUT15QY09) and Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (No.2014028001)

摘要

利用热变形和两步淬火配分(quenching and partitioning, Q&P)工艺的复合作用制备低碳合金钢试样, 设计不同的热变形温度, 研究加载(获得30%变形量)引起的应力和塑性变形对Q&P工艺下马氏体相变开始温度(Ms), 残余奥氏体含量和力学性能的影响. 结果表明, 与传统两步Q&P工艺相比, 复合作用下显微组织细化, 尤其是随着变形温度的降低细化更明显, 马氏体板条呈现弯曲形貌. 随着变形温度升高, Ms升高, 但马氏体转变量却有所下降, 其原因是应力引起的位错多在奥氏体母相晶界处出现, 成为马氏体相变优先形核的位置, 而一旦发生相变, 一定的塑性应变将提高晶内奥氏体的稳定性, 从而促进残余奥氏体含量增加. 复合作用下试样的力学性能也有所提高, 在650 ℃变形时试样的硬度最高, 而在750 ℃变形时试样的塑性最好.

本文引用格式

王存宇,常颖,杨洁,赵坤民,董瀚 . 热变形和淬火配分处理的复合作用对低碳合金钢马氏体相变机制的影响*[J]. 金属学报, 2015 , 51(8) : 913 -919 . DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2014.00709

Abstract

A combined process of hot deformation with different deformation temperatures plus two step quenching and partitioning (Q&P) treatment was applied to low carbon alloyed steel. The effect of stress (30% plastic deformation) on the start temperature of martensite transformation (Ms), volume fraction of retained austenite and mechanical properties was analyzed. It found that comparing with specimen treated by conventional two-step Q&P process, the microstructure of steel treated by combined process was finer and finer with the decreasing hot deformation temperature, and the typical curved micromorphology of martensite exists. Moreover, the Ms of specimen treated by combined process is increased with the increasing of deformation temperature. The effect of stress on the Ms can be attributed to the effect of stress on the grain boundaries of austenitic parent phase, where a large amount of dislocation induced by the stress is prior to occur so as to promote formation of martensite. However, the stability of untransformed austenite was improved by the plastic deformation when matensite transformed so as to get the more retained austenite (the highest volume fraction of retained austenite obtained by combined process of hot deformation at 750 ℃ is 17.2%). Moreover, the mechanical properties were improved by the combined process, namely, the highest hardness of specimen were obtained when hot deformation at 650 ℃ and the highest plasticity were obtained when hot deformed at 750 ℃.

参考文献

[1] Briant C L, Banerji S K. Metall Trans, 1979; 10A: 1729
[2] Lee W S, Su T T. J Mater Process Technol, 1999; 87: 198
[3] Salemi A, Abdollah-Zadeh A. Mater Charact, 2008; 59: 484
[4] Matlock D K, BrautigamV E, Speer J G. Mater Sci Forum, 2003; 426-432: 1089
[5] Speer J, Matlock D K, De Cooman B C, Schroth J G. Acta Mater, 2003; 51: 2611
[6] Santofimia M J, Speer J G, Clarke A J, Zhao L, Sietsma J. Acta Mater, 2009; 57: 4548
[7] Wang C Y, Shi J, Cao W Q, Hui W J, Wang M Q, Dong H. Acta Metall Sin, 2011; 47: 720 (王存宇, 时 捷, 曹文全, 惠卫军, 王毛球, 董 瀚, 金属学报, 2011; 47: 720)
[8] Clarke A J, Speer J G, Matlock D K, Rizzo F C, Edmonds D V, Santofimia M J. Scr Mater, 2009; 61: 149
[9] Rizzo F, Martins A R, Speer J G. Mater Sci Forum, 2007; 539-543: 4476
[10] Wang C Y, Shi J, Cao W Q, Dong H. Mater Sci Eng, 2011; A527: 3442
[11] Cheng L, Wu K M, Wan X L, Wei R. Mater Charact, 2014; 87: 86
[12] Marder A R, Krauss G. Trans ASM, 1969; 69: 957
[13] Hao Q G, Wang Y, Jia X S, Zuo X W, Chen N L, Rong Y H. Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett), 2014; 27: 444
[14] Hsu T Y, Jin X J, Rong Y H. J Alloys Compd, 2013; 577: S568
[15] Xiong X C, Chen B, Huang M X, Wang J F, Wang L. Scr Mater, 2013; 68: 321
[16] Speer J G, Matlock D K. World Iron Steel, 2009; 1: 31
[17] Chandra T, Ionescu M, Mantovani D. Mater Sci Forum, 2012; 706-709: 2824
[18] Zhou S, Zhang K, Chen N L, Gu J F, Rong Y H. ISIJ Int, 2011; 51: 1688
[19] Thomas G A, Speer J G, Matlock D K. Metall Mater Trans, 2011; 42A: 3652
[20] Koistinen D P, Marburger R E. Acta Metall, 1959; 7: 59
[21] Guimaraes J R C, Shyne J C. Metall Trans, 1973; 2: 2063
[22] Wang C Y. PhD Dissertation, Central Iron & Steel Research Institute, Beijing, 2010 (王存宇. 钢铁研究总院博士学位论文, 北京, 2010)
[23] Olson G B, Cohen M. J Less-Common Met, 1972; 28: 107
[24] Hsu T Y. Martensitic Transformation and Martensite. 2nd Ed., Beijing: Science Press, 1999: 690 (徐祖耀. 马氏体相变与马氏体. 第二版, 北京: 科学出版社, 1999: 690)
[25] Liu C C, Yao K F, Gao G F, Liu Z. Acta Metall Sin, 1999; 35: 1125 (刘春成, 姚可夫, 高国峰, 刘 庄. 金属学报, 1999; 35: 1125)
[26] Zhang Y J, Wang C Y, Liu W Z, Cao W Q. Trans Met Heat Treat, 2013; 34(5): 97 (张玉杰, 王存宇, 刘文忠, 曹文全. 材料热处理学报, 2013; 34(5): 97)
文章导航

/