连续柱状晶组织CuNi10Fe1Mn合金变形行为的各向异性

  • 刘永康 ,
  • 黄海友 ,
  • 谢建新
展开
  • 1 北京科技大学新材料技术研究院材料先进制备技术教育部重点实验室, 北京 100083
    2 北京科技大学现代交通金属材料与加工技术北京实验室, 北京 100083
null

刘永康, 男, 1989年生, 硕士生

修回日期: 2014-07-04

  网络出版日期: 2015-01-25

基金资助

* 国家科技支撑计划项目2011BAE23B00, 国家自然科学基金项目51104015和新金属材料国家重点实验室自主研究课题2012Z-12资助

ANISOTROPIC DEFORMATION BEHAVIOR OF CONTINUOUS COLUMNAR-GRAINED CuNi10Fe1Mn ALLOY

  • Yongkang LIU ,
  • Haiyou HUANG ,
  • Jianxin XIE
Expand
  • 1 Key Laboratory for Advanced Materials Processing of Ministry of Education, Institute for Advanced Materials and Technology, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083
    2 Beijing Laboratory of Metallic Materials and Processing for Modern Transportation, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083

Revised date: 2014-07-04

  Online published: 2015-01-25

Supported by

Supported by National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China (No.2011BAE23B00), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51104015) and Independent Research Program of State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials (No.2012Z-12)

摘要

研究了连续柱状晶组织CuNi10Fe1Mn合金板试样沿平行柱状晶生长方向(SD)和垂直柱状晶生长方向(PD)拉伸时的力学性能和变形行为, 讨论了连续柱状晶组织各向异性对合金力学性能和变形行为的影响. 研究结果表明: 试样沿SD和PD均具有[100]择优取向, 但沿SD所有晶粒的取向均分布于[100]附近, 平均Taylor因子m值约为2.17, 而沿PD部分晶粒的取向分散于[001]-[011]之间, 具有一定的取向分散性, m值约为2.93. 低取向分散性、无横向晶界约束等组织特征使试样沿SD变形时应力分布均匀, 各晶粒沿拉伸方向变形一致, 屈服强度和抗拉强度分别为85和215 MPa, 断后伸长率达到42%, 具有典型韧性断口; 由于存在一定的取向分散性和横向晶界, 使得PD试样变形时出现明显的晶界应力集中和表面凹凸起伏, 屈服强度明显增加, 为115 MPa, 断后伸长率下降至36%, 具有混合型断口. 连续柱状晶组织CuNi10Fe1Mn合金的晶粒取向和晶界分布的各向异性是造成变形行为各向异性的原因.

本文引用格式

刘永康 , 黄海友 , 谢建新 . 连续柱状晶组织CuNi10Fe1Mn合金变形行为的各向异性[J]. 金属学报, 2015 , 51(1) : 40 -48 . DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2014.00363

Abstract

In continuous unidirectional solidification process, an unidirectional heat transfer condition can be established to control grain growth direction along the solidification direction (SD). By this method, continuous columnar-grained (CCG) polycrystalline alloys without transverse grain boundary can be obtained, which possess high orientated texture and straight grain boundary morphology. High orientated texture can significantly improve the consistency among the grains, and the straight grain boundaries reduce the number of coordinated strain components, resulting in high plasticity and excellent extension behavior along the SD in the CCG alloys. For example, the CCG polycrystalline CuNi10Fe1Mn alloy has a high tensile elongation (>40%). However, as described above, the CCG polycrystalline alloy has an extremely anisotropic microstructure. In order to improve its performance, select the appropriate processing methods, and establish a reasonable process, its mechanical properties and deformation behavior were investigated with tensile direction along the SD or perpendicular to the solidification direction (PD) in this work. The electron back-scatter diffraction (EBSD) and digital image correlation (DIC) techniques were introduced to study the effects of microstructure anisotropy on the mechanical properties and deformation behavior. The results indicate that both SD and PD samples have [100] preferred orientation. All grains in SD samples (Taylor factor m=2.17) are nearby [100], while some grains in PD samples (Taylor factor m=2.93) scatter among [001]-[011]. Microstructure characteristics of low orientation dispersion and no horizontal grain boundary in SD samples contribute to the uniform stress distribution and consistent deformation behavior in each grain along the tensile direction. The yield strength, tensile strength and elongation are 85 MPa, 215 MPa and 42%, respectively. Compared to SD samples, PD samples appear to grain boundary stress concentration and zigzag surface morphologies due to the orientation dispersion and horizontal grain boundaries. As a result, the yield strength markedly increases to 115 MPa, and the elongation decreases to 36%. The SD and PD samples occur ductile and mixed fracture, respectively. The anisotropic deformation behavior of CCG polycrystalline CuNi10Fe1Mn alloy is attributed to the anisotropic grain orientation and the grain boundary distribution.

参考文献

[1] Ohno A, Soda H, McLean A, Yamazaki H. Adv Mater, 1990; 28: 161
[2] Onaka S, Kato H, Hashimoto S, Miura S. J Jpn Inst Met, 1995; 59: 607
[3] Zhang Z M, Lü T, Xu C J, Guo X F. Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett), 2008; 21: 275
[4] Ji D P, Liu X F, Xie J X, Yu J W, Li W H, Rong M L. Acta Metall Sin, 2006; 42: 1243
[4] (季灯平, 刘雪峰, 谢建新, 余均武, 李卫河, 荣鸣雷. 金属学报, 2006; 42: 1243)
[5] Wang Y, Huang H Y, Xie J X. Mater Sci Eng, 2011; A530: 418
[6] Xie J X, Wang Y, Huang H Y. Chin J Nonferrous Met, 2011; 21: 2324
[6] (谢建新, 王 宇, 黄海友. 中国有色金属学报, 2011; 21: 2324)
[7] Gao K W, Liu M Y, Zou F L, Pang X L, Xie J X. Mater Sci Eng, 2010; A527: 4750
[8] Gan C L, Liu X F, Huang H Y, Xie J X. Mater Sci Eng, 2013; A579: 202
[9] Zhang H, Xie J X, Wang Z D. J Univ Sci Technol Beijing (Engl Ed), 2004; 11: 240
[10] Gan C L, Liu X F, Huang H Y, Xie J X. Acta Metall Sin, 2010; 46: 1549
[10] (甘春雷, 刘雪峰, 黄海友, 谢建新. 金属学报, 2010; 46: 1549)
[11] Mei J, Liu X H, Jiang Y B, Xie J X. Chin J Nonferrous Met, 2012; 22: 2529
[11] (梅 俊, 刘新华, 姜雁斌, 谢建新. 中国有色金属学报, 2012; 22: 2529)
[12] Xie J X, Lou H F, Wang Z D, Hu P X, Zhang H, Dong Y Z, Kang J L, Miao G W, Fu X Z, Yan M, Guan B H, Jiang X L. Chin Pat, 200710065281.9, 2007
[12] (谢建新, 娄花芬, 王自东, 胡萍霞, 张 鸿, 董亚正, 康敬乐, 苗国伟, 符学智, 闫 敏, 关保红, 蒋小亮. 中国专利, 200710065281.9, 2007)
[13] Xie J X, Mei J, Liu X H, Liu X F. Chin Pat, 201010501407.4, 2011
[13] (谢建新, 梅 俊, 刘新华, 刘雪峰. 中国专利, 201010501407.4, 2011)
[14] Mei J, Liu X H, Xie J X. Int J Min Met Mater, 2012; 19: 339
[15] Fu Y B, Yan Z M, Li T J, Chen P, Cheng Y F, Yin G M. Mater Des, 2009; 30: 4478
[16] Li X T, Guo Z X, Zhao X W, Wei B, Chen F B, Li T J. Foundry, 2007; 56: 691
[16] (李新涛, 郭照相, 赵祥伟, 魏 笔, 陈风宝, 李廷举. 铸造, 2007; 56: 691)
[17] Daly S, Ravichandran G, Bhattacharya K. Acta Mater, 2007; 55: 3593
[18] Efstathiou C, Sehitoglu H, Carroll J, Lambros J, Maier H J. Acta Mater, 2008; 56: 3791
[19] Morgeneyer T F, Taillandier-Thomas T, Helfen L, Baumbach T, Sinclair I, Roux S, Hild F. Acta Mater, 2008; 69: 78
[20] Zou F L, Gao K W, Zhu Q F, Xie J X. Acta Metall Sin, 2008; 44: 297
[20] (邹风雷, 高克玮, 朱其芳, 谢建新. 金属学报, 2008; 44: 297)
[21] Bradley A J, Cox W F, Goldschmidt H J. J Inst Met, 1941; 67: 189
[22] DKI German Copper Institute Booklet<uri>http://www.copper.org/applications/marine/cuni/txt_DKI, 2010</uri>
[23] Courtney T H. Mechanical Behavior of Materials. 2nd Ed, New York: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc., 2000: 159
[24] Li X T, Zhao X W, Wei B, Chen F B, Yan Z M, Li T J. Chin J Nonferr Met, 2007; 17: 922
[24] (李新涛, 赵祥伟, 魏 笔, 陈凤宝, 阎志明, 李廷举. 中国有色金属学报, 2007; 17: 922)
[25] Zaefferer S, Kuo J C, Zhao Z, Winning M, Raabe D. Acta Mater, 2003; 51: 4719
文章导航

/