锻态TC18钛合金棒材中β相组织和织构特征研究*

  • 李凯 ,
  • 杨平 ,
  • 沙爱学 ,
  • 颜孟奇
展开
  • 1 北京科技大学材料科学与工程学院, 北京 100083
    2 中航工业北京航空材料研究院, 北京 100095
null

作者简介: 李凯, 男, 1989年生, 硕士生

收稿日期: 2014-01-02

  修回日期: 2014-03-28

  网络出版日期: 2014-06-20

INVESTIGATION OF MICROSTRUCTURE AND TEXTURE OF β PHASE IN A FORGED TC18 TITANIUM ALLOY BAR

  • Kai LI ,
  • Ping YANG ,
  • Aixue SHA ,
  • Mengqi YAN
Expand
  • 1 School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083
    2 Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Aviation Industry Corporation of China, Beijing 100095

Received date: 2014-01-02

  Revised date: 2014-03-28

  Online published: 2014-06-20

摘要

针对α/β型TC18钛合金大型锻棒中心与边部的性能差异, 利用EBSD技术研究了β相的组织差异、织构差异及形变程度差异, 并考察了β相的这些差异对遵循Burgers关系的αp相取向及球化速率的影响. 结果表明, 锻态TC18钛合金中的β相处于不同程度的形变状态, 随位置不同而具有不同的织构, 中心位置β相具有再结晶织构<100>的特点, 并且存在显著的晶粒尺寸不均匀性, 这些因素对中心与边部的性能差异有主要贡献. αp相的球化过程主要在β相晶内亚晶界上完成, 前期随形貌由片状向方块状的变化, 取向关系变化很小; 后期向球形过渡时, 取向关系偏差较大. β相晶粒内的取向差是衡量加工硬化对强度贡献的有效参数, 而α/β两相的取向关系与理想Burgers关系的偏差是揭示球化速度和形变β相晶粒回复程度的有效参数.

关键词: 钛合金; 锻造; 织构; 相变

本文引用格式

李凯 , 杨平 , 沙爱学 , 颜孟奇 . 锻态TC18钛合金棒材中β相组织和织构特征研究*[J]. 金属学报, 2014 , 50(6) : 707 -714 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2014.00003

Abstract

To understand the differences in the mechanical properties between the center and surface regions of large size forged TC18 titanium alloy bar, electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) technique is applied to reveal the differences in textures and strains in β phase in addition to the microstructures observation. The influence of the states of β phase on the deviation to the Burgers orientation relationship (OR) between α/β phases is also analyzed according to the acquired EBSD information. It is found that the β phases in different positions of forged bar are in different states of strain, textures and grain sizes. The β phase in the center shows strong <100> texture and coarse and inhomogeneous grain sizes which all contribute to the difference in properties. The spheroidization of αp phase proceeded mainly within β grains at subgrain boundaries and the OR between two phases changed slightly as the lamella αp phase transforms into block-like αp phase, but changed strongly during transforming to globular morphology. The misorientation in β phase is an effective parameter to evaluate the contribution of work-hardening state for the enhancement of strength, whereas the level of the deviation to Burgers OR is an effective parameter to evaluate the spheroidizing rate and the recovery extent.

参考文献

[1] Zhang Y Q, Guo H Z, Sun H L, Yao Z K. Mater Heat Treatment, 2012; 41(6): 147
[1] (张永强, 郭鸿镇, 孙红兰, 姚泽坤. 热加工工艺, 2012; 41(6): 147)
[2] Huang X, Zhu Z S, Wang H H. Advanced Aeronautical Titanium Alloys and Applications. Beijing: National?Defence?Industry?Press, 2012: 92
[2] (黄 旭,朱知寿,王红红. 先进航空钛合金材料与应用. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2012: 92)
[3] Qiao E L, Feng Y Q, Li W Q, Xie R P, Zhang S B, Chen R J. Met World, 2013; (4): 72
[3] (乔恩利, 冯永琦, 李渭清, 谢仁沛, 张少波, 陈瑞菁. 金属世界, 2013; (4): 72)
[4] Glavicic M G, Goetz R L, Barker D R. Metall Mater Trans, 2008; 49A: 887
[5] Lonardelli I, Gey N, Wenk H R. Acta Mater, 2007; 55: 5718
[6] Gurao N P, Ali AA, Suwas S. Mater Sci Eng, 2009; A504: 24
[7] Cayron C. Scr Mater, 2008; 59: 570
[8] Salem A A, Glavicic M G, Semiatin S L. Mater Sci Eng, 2008; A494: 350
[9] Obasi G C, Moat R J, Prakash D G L. Acta Mater, 2012; 60: 7169
[10] Thomas M J, Wynne B P, Rainforth W M. Mater Charact, 2005; 55: 388
[11] Markovsky P E, Matviychuk Y V, Bondarchuk V I. Mater Sci Eng,2013; A559: 782
[12] Semiatin S L, Kinsel K T, Pilchak A L, Sargent G A. Metall Mater Trans, 2013; 44A: 3852
[13] Sargent G A, Kinsel K T, Pilchak A L. Metall Mater Trans, 2012; 43A: 3570
[14] Obasi G C, Birosca S, Quinta D F J. Acta Mater, 2012; 60: 1048
[15] Obasi G C, Quinta D F J, Rugg D. Mater Sci Eng, 2013; A576: 272
[16] Semiatin S L, Fagin P N, Glavicic M G, Ivasishin O M. Mater Sci Eng, 2001; A299: 225
[17] Jackson M, Dashwood R, Christodoulou L. Metall Mater Trans, 2005; 36A: 1317
[18] Karthikeyan T, Dasgupta A, Khatirkar R. Mater Sci Eng, 2010; A528: 549
[19] He D, Zhu J C, Zaefferer S, Raabe D. Mater Sci Eng, 2012; A549: 20
[20] Li C, Zhang X, Zhou K. Mater Sci Eng, 2012; A558: 668
[21] Germain L, Gey N, Humbert M. Acta Mater, 2008; 56: 4298
[22] Gey N, Bocher P, Uta E. Acta Mater, 2012; 60: 2647
[23] Leo Prakash D G, Honniball P, Rugg D. Acta Mater, 2013; 61: 3200
[24] Glavicic M G, Miller G D, Semiatin S L. Scr Mater, 2006; 54: 281
[25] Gey N, Humbert M. Acta Mater, 2002; 50: 277
[26] Shao H, Zhao Y Q, Ge P, Zeng W D. Mater Sci Eng, 2013; A586: 215
[27] Lütjering G. Mater Sci Eng, 1998; A243: 32
[28] Zhang Z,Wang Q J,Mo W. Titanium Metal Science and Heat Treatment. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2009: 86
[28] (张翥,王群骄,莫畏. 钛的金属学和热处理. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2009: 86)
[29] Zhao D H, Wang L, Zhi M S, Xu F. Chin J Stere Image Analy, 2013; 18: 356
[29] (赵登辉, 王琳, 智茂盛, 徐峰. 中国体视学与图像分析, 2013; 18: 356)
文章导航

/