退火温度对SUS304不锈钢焊接残余应力计算精度的影响*

  • 邓德安 ,
  • KIYOSHIMA Shoichi
展开
  • 1 重庆大学材料科学与工程学院, 重庆400045
    2 哈尔滨工业大学先进焊接与连接国家重点实验室, 哈尔滨100051
    3 Computational Mechanics Research Center Inc., Tokyo, 142-0041, Japan
null

邓德安, 男, 1968年生, 教授

收稿日期: 2013-09-09

  修回日期: 2014-02-08

  网络出版日期: 2014-05-20

基金资助

*国家自然科学基金项目51275544和先进焊接与连接国家重点实验室开放课题基金资助

INFLUENCE OF ANNEALING TEMPERATURE ON CALCULATION ACCURACY OF WELDING RESIDUAL STRESS IN A SUS304 STAINLESS STEEL JOINT

  • Dean DENG ,
  • Shoichi KIYOSHIMA
Expand
  • 1 College of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045
    2 State Key Laboratory of Advanced Welding and Joining, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001
    3 Computational Mechanics Research Center Inc., Tokyo, 142-0041, Japan

Received date: 2013-09-09

  Revised date: 2014-02-08

  Online published: 2014-05-20

Supported by

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51275544) and Open-Fund Research of State Key Laboratory of Advanced Welding and Joining, Harbin Institute of Technology

摘要

采用热-弹-塑性有限元计算方法模拟了奥氏体不锈钢SUS304在单道堆焊时的温度场和应力场, 探讨了加工硬化和退火软化对焊接残余应力计算结果的影响, 重点考察了数值模型中的退火温度设定值对焊接残余应力计算精度的影响. 数值模拟结果表明: 退火软化效应对纵向残余应力的计算结果有明显影响, 随着退火温度设定值的升高, 纵向残余应力的峰值增大, 而且焊缝及其附近的纵向应力有整体升高的趋势.退火温度对横向残余应力的影响较小.比较计算结果与实验结果可知, SUS304钢的退火温度设定为1000 ℃时, 数值模拟结果与实测结果比较吻合.

本文引用格式

邓德安 , KIYOSHIMA Shoichi . 退火温度对SUS304不锈钢焊接残余应力计算精度的影响*[J]. 金属学报, 2014 , 50(5) : 626 -632 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2013.00565

Abstract

Austenite stainless steels such as SUS304, owing to their good combination of mechanical properties, corrosion resistance and weldability, are widely used in a variety of industries. In the simulation of welding residual stress of an austenite stainless steel joint, because of the high strain hardening rate and the heating-cooling thermal cycles, both the work hardening phenomenon and the annealing effect have to be taken into account in the material constitutive relations. Though a number of numerical models have included the work hardening by using isotropic rule, kinematic rule or mixed rule, limited models have dealt with the annealing effect. For the steels or alloys with high strain hardening coefficient, neglecting the annealing effect will overestimate the welding residual stresses to a large extent. In this study, the thermal elastic plastic finite element method (T-E-P FEM) was used to simulate welding temperature and residual stresses in a SUS304 steel bead-on joint. In the computational approach based on the T-E-P FEM, a moving heat source with uniform density distribution was used to model the heat input, and a simple model was proposed to consider the annealing effect. Using the developed computational approach, the influences of work hardening and annealing effect on the welding residual stress were clarified. In addition, the effect of annealing temperature on the distribution and magnitude of welding residual stress in the weld zone and its vicinity was examined. The simulated results show that annealing effect has a significant influence on the longitudinal residual stress, and the peak value of longitudinal tensile stress increases with annealing temperature. The longitudinal tensile stresses in the fusion zone and its vicinity also increase with annealing temperature. It seems that the annealing temperature has insignificant influence on the transverse residual stresses. Comparing the simulated results and the measured data, it was found that when the annealing temperature was assumed to be 1000 ℃ for SUS304 steel, the longitudinal residual stresses predicted by the T-E-P FEM generally match the measurements. The present work is helpful for developing more advanced materials model to calculate welding residual stress with high accuracy.

参考文献

[1] Ueda Y, Murakawa H, Ma N. Welding Deformation and Residual Stress Prevention. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2012: 1
[2] Lindgren L E. Computational Welding Mechanics. London: Woodhead Publishing, 2007: 1
[3] Deng D, Murakawa H. Comp Mater Sci, 2013; 78: 55
[4] Deng D, Tong Y, Ma N, Murakawa H. Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett), 2013; 26: 333
[5] Deng D, Murakawa H. Comp Mater Sci, 2008; 43: 681
[6] Deng D, Murakawa H. Comp Mater Sci, 2006; 37: 209
[7] Keavey M,Mark A,Dai H,Withers P J. Proc ASME 2010 Pressure Vessels & Piping Division/K-PVP Conference, Washington, USA: ASME, 2010 (CD-ROM)
[8] Qiao D, Zhang W, Pan T Y, Crooker P, David S, Feng Z. Sci Technol Weld Joining, 2013; 18: 624
[9] Francis J A, Bhadeshia H K D H, Withers P J. Mater Sci Technol, 2007; 23: 1009
[10] Dong P. Sci Technol Weld Joining, 2005; 10: 389
[11] Totten G, Howes M, Inoue T. Handbook of Residual Stress and Deformation of Steel. Materials Park, Ohio: ASM International, 2002: 1
[12] Ma N, Ueda Y. Trans JWRI, 1994; 23: 239
[13] Ueda Y, Murakawa H, Ma N. Trans AMSE, 1996; 118: 576
[14] Deng D, Kiyoshima S. Comp Mater Sci, 2010; 50: 612
[15] Deng D, Kiyoshima S. Acta Metall Sin, 2010; 46: 195
[15] (邓德安, 青岛祥一. 金属学报, 2010; 46: 195)
[16] Deng D. Mater Des, 2013; 49: 1022
[17] Deng D, Kiyoshima S. Comp Mater Sci, 2012; 62: 23
[18] Okagaito T, Ohji T, Miyasaka F. Q J Jpn Weld Soc, 2004; 22: 21
[19] Okagaito T, Ohji T, Miyasaka F. Q J Jpn Weld Soc, 2005; 23: 536
[20] Dupont J N, Marder A R. Weld J, 1995; 74: 406s
[21] Chaboche J L. Int J Plasticity, 2008; 24: 1642
[22] Deng D, Kiyoshima S. Nucl Eng Des, 2010; 240: 688
[23] Leggatt H. Int J Pres Ves Pip, 2008; 85: 144
文章导航

/