Sn/Cu互连体系界面金属间化合物Cu6Sn5演化和生长动力学的相场法模拟*

  • 柯常波 ,
  • 周敏波 ,
  • 张新平
展开
  • 1 华南理工大学机械与汽车工程学院, 广州 510640
    2 华南理工大学材料科学与工程学院, 广州 510640

收稿日期: 2013-07-16

  修回日期: 2013-11-14

  网络出版日期: 2014-03-20

基金资助

*国家自然科学基金项目51275178和51205135, 高等学校博士点科研基金项目20110172110003以及中央高校基本科研业务费项目2013ZM0026资助

PHASE FIELD SIMULATION ON MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION AND GROWTH KINETICS OF Cu6Sn5 INTERMETALLIC COMPOUND DURING EARLY INTERFACIAL REACTION IN Sn/Cu SOLDERING SYSTEM

  • Changbo KE ,
  • Minbo ZHOU ,
  • Xinping ZHANG
Expand
  • 1 School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640
    2 School of Materials Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640
null

柯常波, 男, 1981 年生, 博士

Received date: 2013-07-16

  Revised date: 2013-11-14

  Online published: 2014-03-20

Supported by

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.51275178 and 51205135) and Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China(No.20110172110003) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.2013ZM0026)

摘要

运用多相场模型模拟了Sn/Cu互连体系中晶界扩散系数 D G B 及界面初生金属间化合物(IMC)相( η相)与液相Sn(L相)间界面能 σ ηL 对界面Cu6Sn5组织演化和生长动力学行为的影响. 研究表明, 界面IMC层Cu6Sn5晶粒以紧密排列的扇贝状形貌存在, 其扇贝状形貌同时受 D G B σ ηL 的竞争性影响. IMC的生长过程由3阶段组成: Cu6Sn5晶粒快速生长铺满Cu基底阶段、Cu6Sn5晶粒转变为扇贝状形貌的过渡阶段以及Cu6Sn5层增厚和晶粒粗化同时进行的正常生长阶段. IMC层厚度随 D G B 增大而增加, 随 σ ηL 增大而减小; 而Cu6Sn5晶粒的平均横向粒径随 D G B 增大而减小, 随 σ ηL 增大而增加. 界面Cu6Sn5层厚度和晶粒横向粒径随反应时间呈指数规律变化, 采用较大 D G B 和晶界能 σ G B = 2 σ ηL 获得的生长指数符合理想的固/液界面反应的生长过程.

本文引用格式

柯常波 , 周敏波 , 张新平 . Sn/Cu互连体系界面金属间化合物Cu6Sn5演化和生长动力学的相场法模拟*[J]. 金属学报, 2014 , 50(3) : 294 -304 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2013.00415

Abstract

In the continuous pursuit of miniaturization, multifunction and high-reliability of electronic products and devices, the packing density has been increasing and the dimension of solder joints has been scaling down. In electronic packaging, during the soldering process being employed to Sn-based solders, an intermetallic compound (IMC) layer is formed between molten solder and pad (or under bump metallization, UBM), whose morphology and thickness as well as growth kinetics play an important role in controlling the service performance of the solder joints, in particular for solder interconnects with the decreasing size where the interfacial IMC layer takes up a high volume fraction in the solder joint. Thus, characterizing the morphology change and growth kinetics of interfacial IMC layer is very important to optimize the soldering process and evaluate the reliability of solder interconnects. In this study, a multi-phase-field model is applied to intensively account for the effect of grain boundary diffusion coefficient ( D G B ) and IMC/liquid interfacial energy σ ηL on the morphology evolution and and growth kinetics of IMC. The simulation results show that Cu6Sn5 grains grow up and contact with each other exhibiting a scallop-like morphology which can be influenced by both the grain boundary diffusion coefficient and IMC/liquid interfacial energy. The IMC growth process exhibits three stages, including the initial stage associated with Cu6Sn5 grain broadening followed by the transition stage characterized by scallop shape formation and the last normal growth stage dominated by IMC layer thickening and concurrent Cu6Sn5 grain coarsening. It is also found that the IMC layer thickness increases with grain boundary diffusion coefficient but decreases with IMC/liquid interfacial energy, while the scallop average width decreases with grain boundary diffusion coefficient and increases with IMC/liquid interfacial energy. The relationships between IMC layer thickness/width and reaction time can be well fitted by an exponential growth law, in which the large grain boundary diffusion coefficient combined with σ G B = 2 σ ηL (where σ GB is the grain boundary energy) can produce precise growth exponent closing to that in the ideal solid-liquid interface reaction.

参考文献

[1] Abtew M, Selvaduray G. Mater Sci Eng, 2000; R27: 95
[2] Yin L M, Yang Y, Liu L Q, Zhang X P. Acta Metall Sin, 2009; 45:422
[2] (尹立孟, 杨 艳, 刘亮岐, 张新平. 金属学报, 2009; 45: 422)
[3] Zhou M B, Ma X, Zhang X P. J Mater Sci Mater Electron, 2012; 23: 1543
[4] Zeng K, Tu K N. Mater Sci Eng, 2002; R38: 55
[5] Zuruzi A S, Chiu C H, Lahiri S K, Tu K N. J Appl Phys, 1999; 86: 4916
[6] Deng X, Piotrowski G, Williams J J, Chawla N. J Electron Mater, 2003; 32: 1403
[7] Shen J, Chan Y C, Liu S Y. Acta Mater, 2009; 57: 5196
[8] Ma D, Wang W D, Lahiri S K. J Appl Phys, 2002; 91: 3312
[9] Chen J, Shen J, Lai S Q, Min D, Wang X C. J Alloys Compd, 2010; 489: 631
[10] Li J F, Agyakwa P A, Johnson C M. Acta Mater, 2010; 58: 3429
[11] Kim H K, Liou H K, Tu K N. Appl Phys Lett, 1995; 66: 2337
[12] Gorlich J, Schmitz G, Tu K N. Appl Phys Lett, 2005; 86: 053106-1
[13] Shin C K, Baik Y J, Huh J Y. J Electron Mater, 2001; 30: 1323
[14] Choi S, Lucas J P, Subramanian K N, Bieler T R. J Mater Sci, 2000; 11: 497
[15] Cho M G, Kim H Y, Seo S K, Lee H M. Appl Phys Lett, 2009; 95: 021905-1
[16] Gong J C, Liu C Q, Conway P P, Silberschmidt V V. Acta Mater, 2008; 56: 4291
[17] Chen J K, Beraun J E, Tzou D Y. J Mater Sci, 1999; 34: 6183
[18] Erickson K L, Hopkins P L, Vianco P T. J Electron Mater, 1998; 27: 117
[19] Huh J Y, Hong K K, Kim Y B, Kim K T. J Electron Mater, 2004; 33: 1161
[20] Hong K K, Huh J Y. J Electron Mater, 2006; 35: 56
[21] Park M S, Arroyave R. Acta Mater, 2010; 58: 4900
[22] Kim S G, Kim W T, Suzuki T, Ode M. J Cryst Growth, 2004; 261: 135
[23] Shim J H, Oh C S, Lee B J, Lee D N. Z Metallkd, 1996; 87: 1
[24] Kim S G, Kim W T, Suzuki T. Phys Rev, 1999; 60E: 7186
[25] Xu G S,Zeng J B,Zhou M B,Cao S S,Ma X,Zhang X P. In: Bi K Y, Yang D G, Cai M eds., Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology & High Density Packaging, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 2012: 289
[26] Zhou M B, Ma X, Zhang X P. Acta Metall Sin, 2013; 3: 341
[26] (周敏波, 马 骁, 张新平. 金属学报, 2013; 3?: 341)
[27] Ma X, Wang F J, Qian Y Y, Yoshida F. Mater Lett, 2003; 57: 3361
[28] Yu D Q, Wang L. J Alloys Compd, 2008; 458: 542
[29] Gosh G. J Appl Phys, 2000; 88: 6887
[30] Suh J O, Tu K N, Lutsenko G V, Gusal A M. Acta Mater, 2008; 56: 1075
[31] Gusak A M, Tu K N. Phys Rev, 2002; 66B: 115403-1
[32] Kim S H, Lee H J, Yu Y S, Won Y S. Acta Mater, 2009; 57: 1254
[33] Laudise R A, Carruthers J R, Jackson K A. Annu Rev Mater Sci, 1971; 1: 253
文章导航

/