论文

汽车板用Al—0.6Mg—0.9Si—0.2Cu合金时效析出动力学研究

  • 张巧霞 ,
  • 郭明星 ,
  • 胡晓倩 ,
  • 曹零勇 ,
  • 庄林忠 ,
  • 张济山
展开
  • 北京科技大学新金属材料国家重点实验室, 北京 100083
张巧霞, 女, 1987年生, 硕士生

收稿日期: 2013-06-17

  修回日期: 2013-08-26

  网络出版日期: 2013-12-11

基金资助

国家高技术研究发展计划项目SS2013AA032103和中央高校基本科研业务费项目FRF—TD—12—001资助

STUDY ON KINETICS OF PRECIPITATION IN Al—0.6Mg—0.9Si—0.2Cu ALLOY FOR AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATION

  • ZHANG Qiaoxia ,
  • GUO Mingxing ,
  • HU Xiaoqian ,
  • CAO Lingyong ,
  • ZHUANG Linzhong ,
  • ZHANG Jishan
Expand
  • State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083

Received date: 2013-06-17

  Revised date: 2013-08-26

  Online published: 2013-12-11

摘要

采用差示扫描量热法(DSC)和硬度测量方法对汽车用Al—0.6Mg—0.9Si—0.2Cu(质量分数, %)合金不同状态析出动力学进行了研究. 结果表明,T4态合金升温到100—-150℃时, DSC曲线出现低温析出峰,而T4P态合金无此低温析出峰; 经过T4P处理的合金其β″相析出峰位向低温移动.利用A—J—M方法计算合金不同相析出动力学参数,结果表明, T4和T4P态合金GP区溶解激活能分别为66和119 kJ/mol, β″相析出激活能分别为114和60 kJ/mol;T4态合金的溶解和析出动力学方程分别为:YGP=1-exp[-1.3×107t exp(-7977/T)],Yβ=1-exp[-4.7×1022t2exp(-27484/T)];T4P态合金的溶解和析出动力学方程分别为:YGP=1-exp[-2.4×1013 t exp(-14345/T)],Yβ=1-exp[-2.9×1011t2 exp(-14392/T)].此外, 在185℃时效过程中, 随着时效时间的延长, T4和T4P态合金的硬度均先不断增加达到峰值后趋于平缓,但是T4态合金经20 min时效处理后出现硬度下降, 而T4P态合金无此现象,利用GP区回溶和β″相析出动力学对此变化规律进行了很好的解释.

本文引用格式

张巧霞 , 郭明星 , 胡晓倩 , 曹零勇 , 庄林忠 , 张济山 . 汽车板用Al—0.6Mg—0.9Si—0.2Cu合金时效析出动力学研究[J]. 金属学报, 2013 , 49(12) : 1604 -1610 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2013.00330

Abstract

The kinetics of precipitation in Al—0.6Mg—0.9Si—0.2Cu (mass fraction, %) alloy under different conditions was investigated by differential scanning calorimetric analyses (DSC) and microhardness measurements. The results show that, an exothermic peak at about 100—-150℃ can be observed in the DSC curve for the nature aged (T4) alloy, but no peak for the pre—aged (T4P) alloy, and the peak corresponding with β″ phase moves toward the low temperature zone for T4P alloy. The fraction of transformation Y, the rate of transformation dY/dT, and the kinetic parameters such as activation energy Q and frequency factor k0 for GP zones dissolution and β″phase transformation were calculated by Avrami—Johnson—Mehl equation. The values of activation energy for GP zones dissolution after natural aging and pre—aging were 66 and 119 kJ/mol, respectively, and the values forβ″phase formation after natural aging and pre—aging were 114 and 60 kJ/mol, respectively. The kinetics expressions were obtained as follows, for T4 alloy:YGP=1-exp[-1.3×107t exp(-7977/T)],Yβ=1-exp[-4.7×1022t2 exp(-27484/T)];for T4P alloy: YGP=1-exp[-2.4×1013 t exp(-14345/T)],Yβ=1-exp[-2.9×1011t2 exp(-14392/T)].In addition, with the increasing of aging time, the wholetrend of hardness changing for pre—aged alloy is increasing at first, and then keeps constant basically,but for the nature aged alloy, the hardness decreases after aging at 185℃ for 20 min, which was explained by the kinetics obtained above.

参考文献

[1] Miller W S, Zhuang L, Bottema J, Wittebrood A J, De Smet P, Haszler A,Vieregge A.  Mater Sci Eng, 2000; A280: 37

[2] Birol Y, Karlik M.  Scr Mater, 2006; 55: 625
[3] Birol Y.  Mater Sci Eng, 2005; A391:175
[4] Liu H, Chen Y, Zhao G, Liu C M, Zuo L.  Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, 2006; 16: 917
[5] Zhen L, Kang S B.  Scr Mater, 1997; 36: 1089
[6] Ou B L, Shen C H.  Scand J Metall, 2005; 34: 318
[7] Esmaeili S, Lloyd D J.  Acta Mater, 2005; 53: 5257
[8] Wei F, Li J S, Chen C Q.  Rare Met Mater Eng, 2008; 37: 1348
(魏芳, 李金山, 陈昌麒. 稀有金属材料与工程, 2008; 37: 1348)
[9] Gupta A K, Jena A K, Chaturvedi M C.  Scr Metall, 1988; 22: 369
[10] Ghosh K S, Gao N.  Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, 2011; 21: 1199
[11] Oguocha I N A, Yannacopoulos S.  Mater Sci Eng, 1997; A231: 25
[12] Edwards G A, Stiller K, Dunlop G L, Couper M J.  Acta Mater, 1998; 46: 3893
[13] De Geuser F, Lefebvre W, Blavette D.  Philos Mag Lett, 2006; 86: 227
[14] Zhen L, Kang S B, Kim H W.  Mater Sci Technol, 1997; 13: 905
[15] Murayama M, Hono K.  Acta Mater, 1999; 47: 1537
[16] Miao W F, Laughlin D E.  Metall Mater Trans, 2000; 31A: 361
[17] Esmaeili S, Lloyd D J.  Mater Charact, 2005; 55: 307
[18] An Y G, Zhang L, Vegter H, Hurkmans A.  Metall Mater Trans, 2002; 33A: 3121
[19] Luo A, Lloyd D J, Gupta A, Youdelis W V.  Acta Metall Mater, 1993; 41: 769
[20] Ortega A.  Thermochim Acta, 1996; 284: 379
[21] Matsuda K, Naoi T, Fujii K, Uetani Y, Sato T, Kamio A, Ikeno S.  Mater Sci Eng, 1999;A262: 232
[22] Chakrabarti D J, Laughlin D E.  Prog Mater Sci, 2004; 49: 389
[23] Gaber A, Ali A M, Matsuda K, Kawabata T, Yamazaki T, Ikeno S.  J Alloys Compd, 2007;432: 149
[24] Cuniberti A, Tolley A, Riglos M V, Giovachini R.  Mater Sci Eng, 2010; A527: 5307
[25] Buha J, Lumley R N, Crosky A G, Hono K.  Acta Mater, 2007; 55: 3015
[26] Galwey A K, Brown M E.  Handbook of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. Amsterdam: Elesvier, 1998: 147
文章导航

/