论文

Cu56Hf27Ti17块体金属玻璃的缺口韧性

  • 朱振东 ,
  • 徐坚
展开
  • 中国科学院金属研究所沈阳材料国家(联合)实验室, 沈阳 110016
朱振东, 男, 1984年生, 博士生

收稿日期: 2013-03-28

  修回日期: 2013-04-11

  网络出版日期: 2013-08-11

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目51171180

Cu56Hf27Ti17 BULK METALLIC GLASS WITH HIGH FRACTURE TOUGHNESS

  • ZHU Zhendong ,
  • XU Jian
Expand
  • Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shenyang 110016

Received date: 2013-03-28

  Revised date: 2013-04-11

  Online published: 2013-08-11

摘要

通过研究Cu-Hf-Ti三元合金的玻璃形成能力对合金成分的依赖性,优化出Cu56Hf27Ti17Cu57Hf27Ti16合金,其形成金属玻璃棒材的临界直径为5 mm.采用单边缺口试样测量的Cu56Hf27Ti17金属玻璃的缺口韧性KQ为(92±10) MPa·m1/2, 几乎是Cu49Hf42Al9金属玻璃(KQ=(56±9) MPa·m1/2)的一倍,是目前所知韧性最高的铜基块体金属玻璃. 相对于Cu49Hf42Al9金属玻璃,Cu56Hf27Ti17金属玻璃的高韧性与其高Poisson比(ν=0.361)和低剪切模量(G=38.6 GPa)关联. Cu56Hf27Ti17块体金属玻璃的高韧性表现为裂纹尖端形成大塑性区, 在裂纹萌生与扩展过程中,形成大尺寸剪切滑移区和脉纹花样区. Cu56Hf27Ti17Cu49Hf42Al9块体金属玻璃在缺口韧性上的差异表明,从Cu-Zr/Hf基合金中去除Al元素有利于金属玻璃的韧化.

本文引用格式

朱振东 , 徐坚 . Cu56Hf27Ti17块体金属玻璃的缺口韧性[J]. 金属学报, 2013 , 49(8) : 969 -975 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2013.00139

Abstract

As a sort of quasi-brittle materials, fracture toughness of bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) is of paramount importance for their engineering application. Among the BMG families, Cu-based BMGs are of interest due to their low cost, high strength and less brittleness. As indicated in previous work, the Cu49Hf42Al9 BMG exhibits a good combination of toughness and glass forming ability (GFA). Moreover, toughness of BMG significantly depends on alloy composition. In the Zr-Cu-Al system, it was suggested that increasing the Al content in the alloy does not favor to the plasticity of the glass. Then, it is expected that Al-free Cu-Hf-Ti BMGs may be tougher than the Cu49Hf42Al9 BMG. In addition, notched cylindrical samples were used for the toughness assessment in previous investigation, which probably introduce an overestimation in toughness in comparison with archival data of engineering materials. To obtain the glassy plate samples for toughness measurements to meet the ASTM E399 requirement, alloys with robust GFA is necessary. In this work, the composition dependence of GFA for ternary Cu-Hf-Ti alloys was revisited. The alloys with the optimal GFA are located around the Cu56Hf27Ti17 and Cu57Hf27Ti16. The critical diameter to form the BMG rods was determined to be 5 mm. Then, the Cu56Hf27Ti17 BMG plates of 2.5 mm in thickness can be fabricated as the specimens for toughness assessments. Using the single-edge notched specimen for three-point bending test, the notch toughness K Q of Cu56Hf27Ti17 BMG was determined to be(92±10) MPa·m1/2. It is nearly doubled with respect to the Cu49Hf42Al9 BMG (KQ=(56±9) MPa·m1/2).It means that the Cu56Hf27Ti17 BMG is the toughest among currently-available Cu-based BMGs. Such high toughness of Cu56Hf27Ti17 BMG also correlates with its moderate Poisson's ratio (ν=0.361) and low shear modulus (G=38.6 GPa). The enhanced toughness of Cu56Hf27Ti17 BMG is associated with the extended plastic zone size at the notch tip with the proliferation of shear banding events. The fact that the Cu56Hf27Ti17 superior to Cu49Hf42Al9 BMG in toughness seemingly supports that Al element has an unfavorable effect on the toughness of Cu-Zr/Hf-based BMGs.

参考文献

[1] Greer A, Ma E.  MRS Bull, 2007; 32: 611

[2] Schuh C A, Hufnagel T C, Ramamurty U.  Acta Mater, 2007; 55: 4067
[3] Meyers M A, Chawla K K.  Mechanical Behavior of Materials. 2nd Ed., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 404
[4] Xu J, Ramamurty U, Ma E.  JOM, 2010; 62: 10
[5] Demetriou M D, Launey M E, Garrett G, Schramm J P, Hofmann D C, Johnson W L,Ritchie R O.  Nat Mater, 2011; 10: 123
[6] He Q, Cheng Y Q, Ma E, Xu J.  Acta Mater, 2011; 59: 202
[7] He Q, Shang J K, Ma E, Xu J.  Acta Mater, 2012; 60: 4940
[8] Gu X J, Poon S J, Shiflet G J, Lewandowski J J.  Acta Mater, 2010; 58: 1708
[9] Schroers J, Johnson W L.  Phys Rev Lett, 2004; 93: 255506
[10] Jia P, Guo H, Li Y, Xu J, Ma E.  Scr Mater, 2006; 54: 2165
[11] Dai C L, Guo H, Shen Y, Li Y, Ma E, Xu J.  Scr Mater, 2006; 54: 1403
[12] Shen Y, Ma E, Xu J.  J Mater Sci Technol, 2008; 24: 149
[13] Inoue A, Zhang W, Zhang T, Kurosaka K.  J Mater Res, 2001; 16: 2836
[14] Figueroa I A, Davies H A, Todd I.  J Alloys Compd, 2007; 434-435: 164
[15] Choi-Yim H, Conner R D.  J Alloys Compd, 2008; 459: 160
[16] Jia P, Zhu Z D, Ma E, Xu J.  Scr Mater, 2009; 61: 137
[17] Cheng Y Q, Ma E, Sheng H W.  Phys Rev Lett, 2009; 102: 245501
[18] Zhang L, Cheng Y Q, Cao A J, Xu J, Ma E.  Acta Mater, 2009; 57: 1154
[19] Cheng Y Q, Sheng H W, Ma E.  Phys Rev, 2008; 78B: 014207
[20] Cheng Y Q, Cao A J, Ma E.  Acta Mater, 2009; 57: 3253
[21] Lewandowski J J, Wang W H, Greer A L.  Philos Mag Lett, 2005; 85: 77
[22] Lewandowski J J, Gu X J, Nouri A S, Poon S J, Shiflet G J.  Appl Phys Lett,2008; 92: 091918
[23] Conner R D, Rosakis A J, Johnson W L, Owen D M.  Scr Mater, 1997; 37: 1373
[24] Demetriou M D, Kaltenboeck G, Suh J Y, Garrett G, Floyd M, Crewdson C,
Hofmann D C, Kozachkov H, Wiest A, Schramm J P, Johnson W L.  Appl Phys Lett, 2009; 95: 041907
[25] Suh J Y, Conner R D, Kim C P, Demetriou M D, Johnson W L.  J Mater Res, 2010; 25: 982
[26] Lowhaphandu P, Lewandowski J J.  Scr Mater, 1998; 38: 1811
[27] Henann D L, Anand L.  Acta Mater, 2009; 57: 6057
[28] Kawashima A, Kurishita H, Kimura H, Zhang T, Inoue A.  Mater Trans, 2005; 46: 1725
[29] Chen H S, Krause J T, Coleman E.  J Non-Cryst Solids, 1975; 18: 157
[30] Wang S G, Shi L L, Xu J.  J Mater Res, 2011; 26: 923
[31] Zhu Z D, Jia P, Xu J.  Scr Mater, 2011; 64: 785
[32] Johnson W L, Samwer K.  Phys Rev Lett, 2005; 95: 195501
[33] He Q, Xu J.  J Mater Sci Technol, 2012; 28: 1109
[34] Johnson W L, Demetriou M D, Harmon J S, Lind M L, Samwer K.  MRS Bull, 2007; 32: 644
[35] Demetriou M D, Harmon J S, Tao M, Duan G, Samwer K, Johnson W L.  Phys Rev Lett, 2006; 97: 065502
文章导航

/