论文

微观组织对共析钢室温加工硬化行为的影响

  • 郑成思 ,
  • 李龙飞 ,
  • 杨王玥 ,
  • 孙祖庆
展开
  • 1) 北京科技大学新金属材料国家重点实验室, 北京 100083
    2) 北京科技大学材料科学与工程学院, 北京 100083
郑成思, 男, 1986年生, 博士生

收稿日期: 2012-08-24

  修回日期: 2012-12-24

  网络出版日期: 2013-03-11

基金资助

 

中央高校基础科研业务费项目FRF-TP-12-135A和新金属材料国家重点实验室自主课题资助

INFLUENCE OF MICROSTRUCTURES OF EUTECTOIDSTEEL ON ROOM TEMPERATURE WORKHARDENING BEHAVIOR

  • ZHENG Chengsi1 ,
  • LI Longfei1 ,
  • YANG Wangyue2 ,
  • SUN Zuqing1
Expand
  • 1) The State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, University of Science& Technology Beijing, Beijing,100083
    2) School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science & Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083

Received date: 2012-08-24

  Revised date: 2012-12-24

  Online published: 2013-03-11

摘要

通过不同热机械处理工艺, 分别获得片层珠光体、球化珠光体、超细化(α+θ)复相组织以及细晶(α+θ)复相组织等4种不同组织的共析钢. 利用室温单轴拉伸实验、SEM和TEM等手段研究了上述组织对共析钢室温加工硬化行为的影响. 结果表明: 片层珠光体组织具有抗拉强度高、屈强比小且均匀延伸率低的特点, 这与其初始加工硬化率高、加工硬化率随应变量增加而下降的程度有直接关系. 其它3种铁素体/渗碳体粒子复相组织的初始加工硬化率较低, 但下降趋势较缓, 表现出较好的塑性变形能力.与球化珠光体相比, 组织细化使超细化(α+θ)复相组织和细晶(α+θ)复相组织具有更好的强度与塑性配合.

本文引用格式

郑成思 , 李龙飞 , 杨王玥 , 孙祖庆 . 微观组织对共析钢室温加工硬化行为的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2013 , 49(3) : 257 -264 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2012.00503

Abstract

Steels with ultrafine (α+θ) duplex structure, consisting of ferrite matrix (α) with average grainsize of about 1μm and dispersed cementite particles (θ), have been investigated widely in recent years formaking better the work-hardening capability of ultrafine-grained steels. In fact, the ratio of yield strength to tensilestrength for plain carbon steels with ultrafine (α+θ) duplex structure is commonly larger than 0.85. Forstructural material, the low ratio of yield strength to tensile strength is beneficial to absorb external energy anddelay theoccurrence of destruction. However, the ratio of yield strength to tensile strength is still relatively high for steelswith ultrafine (α+θ) duplex structure to act as the structural material. Namely, the work-hardening capability ofultrafine (α+θ) duplex steel needs further improving. It could be feasible for improving the work-hardeningcapability of ultrafine (α+θ) duplex steel to change the form, size and distribution of the cementite. Therefore, it isnecessary to investigate the work--hardening behavior of steel with different cementite states. In the present research, four different microstructures of eutectoid steel were obtained by different thermo-mechanicaltreatments, i.e., lamellar pearlite, spheroidized pearlite, ultrafine (α+θ) duplex structure and fine-grained (α+θ)duplex structure. The effect of different microstructures on the room--temperature work-hardening behavior of theeutectoid steel was analyzed using room temperature tensile tests, SEM and TEM. The results indicated that thework-hardening characters of lamellar pearlite,which initial work hardening rate is large but decreases quickly with strain, have direct relationship with its large tensile strength, small yield ratio and low uniform elongation.Although the initial work hardening rates of the three ferrite/cementite particles duplex structures are lower, theydecrease much slowly with strain comparing with that of lamellar pearlite. Therefore, three types offerrite/cementite particles duplex structures demonstrate good plastic deformation capability. In comparison withspheroidized pearlite, ultrafine (α+θ) duplex structure and fine-grained (α+θ) duplex structure demonstrate better balance between strength and plasticity due to microstructure refinement.

参考文献

[1]Howe AA.Mater SciTechnol, 2000; 16: 1264


[2]Jia D, Ramesh K T, Ma E.Acta Mater, 2003; 51: 3495

[3]Hazra S S, Pereloma E V, Gazder A A.Acta Mater, 2011; 59: 4015

[4]Gazder A A, Hazra S S, Pereloma E V.Mater SciEng, 2011; A530: 492

[5]Akio O, Shiro T, Kotobu N.ISIJ Int, 2004; 44: 1063

[6]Torizuka S, Muramatsu E, NarayanaMurty S V S, Nagai K.Scr Mater, 2006; 55: 751

[7]Zhao M C, Yin F X, Hanamura T, Nagai K, Atrens A.Scr Mater, 2007; 57: 857

[8]Maki T, Furuhara T.Mater Sci Forum, 2003; 426--432: 19

[9]Furuhara T, Mizoguchi T.ISIJ Int, 2004; 45: 392

[10]Song R, Ponge D, Raabe R.Scr Mater, 2005; 52: 1075

[11]Song R, Ponge D, Raabe R.Acta Mater, 2005; 53: 4881

[12]Tsuzaki K, Sato E, Furimoto S, Furuhara T, Maki T.Scr Mater, 1999; 40: 675

[13]Park K T, Kim Y S, Lee J G, Shi D H.Mater SciEng, 2000; A293: 165

[14]Tsuji N, Ueji R, Minamino Y, Saito Y.Scr Mater, 2002; 46: 305

[15]Ueji R, Tsuji N, Minamino Y, Koizumi Y.Acta Mater, 2002; 50: 4177

[16]Park K T, Shin D H.Metall Mater Trans, 2002; 33A: 705

[17]Song R, Ponge D, Raabe D, Kaspar R.Acta Mater, 2005; 53: 845

[18]Tsuchida N, Masuda H, Harada Y, Fukaura K, Tomota Y, Nagai K.Mater SciEng, 2008; A488: 446

[19]Song R, Ponge D, Raabe D, Speer J G, Matlock D K.Mater SciEng, 2006; A441: 1

[20]Yoda R, Shibata K, Morimitsu T, Terada D, Tsuji N.Scr Mater, 2011; 65: 175

[21]Syn C K, Lesuer D, Sherby O D.Metall Mater Trans, 1994; 25A: 1481

[22]Chen W, Li L F, Yang W Y, Sun Z Q, He J P.ActaMetall Sin, 2009; 45: 151

(陈伟, 李龙飞, 杨王玥, 孙祖庆, 何建平. 金属学报, 2009; 45: 151)

[23]Huang Q S, Li L F, Yang W Y, Sun Z Q.ActaMetall Sin, 2007; 43: 724

(黄青松, 李龙飞, 杨王玥, 孙祖庆. 金属学报, 2007; 43: 724)

[24]Oyama T, Sherby O D, Wadsworth J, Walser B.ScrMetall, 1984; 18: 799

[25]Dollar M, Bernstein I M, Thompson A W.ActaMetall, 1988; 36: 311

[26]Ray K K, Mondal D.ActaMetall Mater, 1991; 39: 2201

[27]Ashby M F.Philos Mag, 1970; 21: 399

[28]Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf D.Philos Mag, 1999; 79: 955

文章导航

/