Ti2448合金高温变形行为及组织演变机制的转变

田宇兴; 李述军; 郝玉琳; 杨锐

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1037.2012.00007

金属学报 >

2012 , Vol. 48 >Issue 7: 837 - 844

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1037.2012.00007

论文

Ti2448合金高温变形行为及组织演变机制的转变

田宇兴 ,
李述军 ,
郝玉琳 ,
杨锐

展开

中国科学院金属研究所沈阳材料科学国家(联合)实验室, 沈阳 110016

田宇兴, 男, 1984年生, 博士生

收稿日期: 2012-01-05

修回日期: 2012-03-31

网络出版日期: 2012-07-11

基金资助

国家重点基础研究发展计划项目2012CB933901和2012CB933902, 国家高技术研究发展计划项目2011AA030106及国家自然科学基金项目51071152和50901080资助

收起

HIGH TEMPERATURE DEFORMATION BEHAVIOR AND MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION MECHANISM TRANSFORMATION IN Ti2448 ALLOY

TIAN Yu-Xin ,
LI Shu-Jun ,
HAO Yu-Lin ,
YANG Rui

Expand

Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016

Received date: 2012-01-05

Revised date: 2012-03-31

Online published: 2012-07-11

Fold

摘要

研究了多功能亚稳β型Ti2448(Ti-24Nb-4Zr-8Sn, 质量分数, %)合金在$\beta$单相区的高温变形行为. 结果表明,在低应变速率(<0.1 s^-1)和高应变速率(>1 s^-1)条件下, 真应力和应变速率的双对数关系可以通过2个线性关系分别表征, 平均应变速率敏感值(m_avg)分别为0.265和0.032, 这不同于常规β钛合金随着应变速率的增大而逐渐降低的应变硬化规律, 即Sigmoidal曲线特征. 微观组织演化和动力学分析显示, 这种特殊的双线性关系与高应变速率导致的局域化非均匀塑性变形行为和动态再结晶(DRX) 相关联.尽管动态回复(DRV)是该合金高温塑性变形的主要组织演变机制, 高应变速率使得组织演变从DRV向DRX 转变, 并在交错的变形带内形成小于3 μm的细晶组织. 因此, 高应变速率条件下的DRX是实现Ti2448合金高温变形过程中细化组织的主要机制.

关键词： Ti2448合金; 动态回复(DRV); 动态再结晶(DRX); 应变速率; 组织演变

本文引用格式

田宇兴 , 李述军 , 郝玉琳 , 杨锐 . Ti2448合金高温变形行为及组织演变机制的转变[J]. 金属学报, 2012 , 48(7) : 837 -844 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2012.00007

Abstract

Ti2448 (Ti-24Nb-4Zr-8Sn, mass fraction, %) is a multifunctional β-type biomedical titanium alloy with low elastic modulus, high strength and good biocompatibility. The alloy exhibits a peculiar plastic deformation behavior at room temperature called highly localized plastic deformation. With aid of such mechanism, the initial microstructure with coarse grains can be easily refined to homogenous equiaxed microstructure with nano-sized grains by the conventional cold processing such as rolling. In the paper, its high temperature plastic deformation behavior and the corresponding microstructure evolution were investigated in the single $\beta$ phase field by varying the strain rates in the ranges of 0.001-70 s^-1. The results showed that the true stress and strain rate can be described by a bilinear relation, which is in sharp contrast with the conventional Sigmoidal relation found in other β-type titanium alloys. As the strain rates less than 0.1 s^-1, the alloy follows the conventional β-type titanium alloys with a high average value of strain rate sensitivity being 0.265. As the strain rates higher than 1 s^-1, the true stress and strain rate can be described by another linear relation with a much small average value of strain rate sensitivity being 0.032. This is different from other alloys exhibiting gradual decrease of strain hardening with the increase of the strain rates. Microstructure observations and kinetic analyses revealed that such bilinear relation would be related to its highly localized plastic deformation behavior and dynamic recrystallization (DRX), which are triggered and enhanced at higher strain rates over 1 s^-1. Although dynamic recovery (DRV) is still a key microstructure evolution mechanism of the alloy during plastic deformation in single β phase field, the increase of strain rate induces a transformation from DRV to DRX, resulting in significant grain refinement from the initial coarse grains about 80 μm to refined grains less than 3 μm. Thus, the DRX is a crucial mechanism of the Ti2448 alloy to achieve significant grain refinement during hot processing.

Key words： Ti2448 alloy; dynamic recovery (DRV); dynamic recrystallization (DRX); strain rate; microstructure evolution

参考文献

[1] Weiss I, Semiatin S L. Mater Sci Eng, 1998; A243: 46

[2] Warchomicka F, Stockinger M, Degischer H P. J Mater Process Technol, 2006; 177: 473

[3] Kent D, Wang G, Yu Z T, Ma X Q, Dargusch M. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2011; 4: 405

[4] Bourell D L, McQueen H J. J Mater Shaping Technol, 1987; 5: 53

[5] Gourdet S, Montheillet F. Mater Sci Eng, 2000; A283: 274

[6] Sakai T. J Mater Process Technol, 1995; 53: 349

[7] Kuhlaann–Wilsdorf D, Hansen N. Scr Metall, 1991; 25: 1557

[8] McQueen H J. Mater Sci Eng, 2004; A387–389: 203

[9] Henshall G A, Kassner M E, McQueen H J. Metall Trans, 1992; 23A: 881

[10] Gryziecki J, Gdula Z. Mater Sci Eng, 1987; A93: 99

[11] Kaibyshev R, Sitdikov O, Goloborodko A, Sakai T. Mater Sci Eng, 2003; A344: 348

[12] Hallberg H, Wallin M, Ristinmaa M. Mater Sci Eng, 2010; A527: 1126

[13] Sitdikov O, Sakai T, Avtokratova E, Kaibyshev R, Tsuzaki K, Watanabe Y. Acta Mater, 2008; 56: 821

[14] Belyakov A, Gao W, Mirura H, Sakai T. Metall Mater Trans, 1998; 29A: 2957

[15] Chen Y J, Li Y J, Walmsley J C, Dumoulin S, Roven H J. Metall Mater Trans, 2010; 41A: 787

[16] Wang G, Xu L, Tian Y X, Zheng Z, Cui Y Y, Yang R. Mater Sci Eng, 2011; A528: 22

[17] Philippart I, Rack H J. Mater Sci Eng, 1998; A254: 253

[18] Balasubrahmanyam V V, Prasad Y V R K. Mater Sci Eng, 2002; A336: 150

[19] Mironov S, Sato Y S, Kokawa H. Mater Sci Eng, 2010; A527: 7498

[20] Hao Y L, Li S J, Sun S Y, Zheng C Y, Yang R. Acta Biomater, 2007; 3: 277

[21] Zhang S Q, Li S J, Jia M T, Hao Y L, Yang R. Scr Mater, 2009; 60: 733

[22] Cui J P, Hao Y L, Li S J, Sui M L, Li D X, Yang R. Phys Rev Lett, 2009; 102: 045503

[23] Hao Y L, Yang R. Acta Metall Sin, 2005; 41: 1183

(郝玉琳, 杨锐. 金属学报, 2005; 41: 1183)

[24] Vuayshankar M N, Ankem S. Mater Sci Eng, 1990; A129: 229

[25] Lee W S, Lin C F, Chen T H, Hwang H H. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2008; 1: 336

[26] Anken S, Margolin H. Metall Trans, 1986; 17A: 2209

[27] Rao K P, Presad Y V R K. J Mech Work Technol, 1986; 13: 83

[28] McQueen H J, Jin N, Ryan N D. Mater Sci Eng, 1995; A190: 43

[29] Dadras P, Thomas J F. Metall Trans, 1981; 12A: 1867

[30] Li L, Zhou J, Duszczyk J. J Mater Process Technol, 2006; 172: 372

[31] Morgan G C, Hammond C. Mater Sci Eng, 1987; 86: 159

[32] McQueen H J. Microstruct Sci, 1979; 7: 71

[33] Song H W, Zhang S H, Cheng M, Li Z X, Cao C X, Bao C L. Acta Metall Sin, 2011; 47: 462

(宋鸿武, 张士宏, 程明, 李臻熙, 曹春晓, 包春玲. 金属学报, 2011; 47: 462)

[34] Montheillet F, Dajno D, Come N, GauTier E, Simon A, Audrerie P, Chaze A M, Levaillant Ch. In: Froes F H, Caplan I, eds., Titanium 92: Science and Technology, Warrendale: TMS, 1993: 1347

[35] McQueen H J, Bourell D L. In: Sachdev A K, Embury J D, eds., Formability and Metallurgical Structure, Warrendale: TMS, 1987: 344

[36] Warchomicka F, Poletti C, Stockinger M. Mater Sci Eng, 2011; A528: 8277

[37] Sergueeva A V, Stolyarov V V, Valiev R Z, Mukherjee A K. Scr Mater, 2000;43: 819

[38] Li L X, Lou Y, Yang L B, Peng D S, Rao K P. Mater Des, 2002; 23: 451

[39] Kim J H, Semiatin S L, Lee C S. Mater Sci Eng, 2008; A485: 601

[40] Hao Y L, Li S J, Sun S Y, Zheng C Y, Hu Q M, Yang R. Appl Phys Lett, 2005; 87: 091906

[41] Warchomicka F, Stockinger M, Degischer H P. J Mater Process Technol, 2006; 177: 473

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献