论文

Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe1.95-xTix (x=0, 0.03, 0.06, 0.09) 合金的微观组织与磁致伸缩性能

  • 李晓诚 ,
  • 丁雨田 ,
  • 胡勇
展开
  • 1) 兰州理工大学甘肃省有色金属新材料省部共建国家重点实验室, 兰州 730050
    2) 兰州理工大学温州泵阀工程研究院, 温州 325105
李晓诚, 男, 1983年生, 硕士生

收稿日期: 2011-04-25

  修回日期: 2011-12-15

  网络出版日期: 2012-01-11

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目11004091, 浙江省自然科学基金项目Y4090219和甘肃省自然科学基金项目0916RJZA025资助

MICROSTRUCTURE AND MAGNETOSTRICTION OF THE Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe1.95-xTix (x=0, 0.03, 0.06, 0.09) ALLOYS

  • LI Xiao-Cheng ,
  • DING Yu-Tian ,
  • HU Yong
Expand
  • 1) State Key Laboratory of Gansu Advanced Nonferrous Metal Materials, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050
    2) Wenzhou Pump $\&$ Valve Engineering Research Institute, Lanzhou University of Technology, Wenzhou 325105

Received date: 2011-04-25

  Revised date: 2011-12-15

  Online published: 2012-01-11

Supported by

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.11004091), Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No.Y4090219) and Natural  Science Foundation of Gansu Province (No.0916RJZA025)

摘要

利用高真空非自耗电弧炉制备了Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe1.95-xTix (x=0, 0.03, 0.06, 0.09) 合金, 系统研究了不同 Ti含量Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe1.95-xTix合金的晶体结构、微观组织、磁致伸缩性能及它们之间的关系. 结果表明: 添加 Ti后的Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe1.95-xTix合金基体相仍为MgCu$_{2}$型Laves相结构, Ti取代了 Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe1.95合金中比其自身半径大的稀土原子Tb和Dy而使晶格常数减小. 添加Ti后, 初生相TiFe2的形成使得凝固液体中富含R (R=Tb, Dy)从而抑制了有害相RFe3的生成, Ti在基体相RFe2中和富$R$相中都可溶解, 分别形成了(R, Ti)Fe2基体相和富(R, Ti)相. Ti的添加量对磁致伸缩性能的影响很大, 当x=0.03时, Ti的添加使磁致伸缩性能较 Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe1.95母合金提高幅度最大, 但当x=0.09时, 由于顺磁相TiFe2和富(R, Ti)相的析出对磁致伸缩性能不利, 但相对于Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe1.95母合金也有少量提高.

本文引用格式

李晓诚 , 丁雨田 , 胡勇 . Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe1.95-xTix (x=0, 0.03, 0.06, 0.09) 合金的微观组织与磁致伸缩性能[J]. 金属学报, 2012 , 48(1) : 11 -15 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2011.00269

Abstract

The Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe1.95-xTix ($x$=0, 0.03, 0.06, 0.09) alloys were prepared by high--vacuum non-consumable arc melting furnace. The crystal structure, microstructure, magnetostriction and their relationships of the Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe1.95-xTix ($x$=0, 0.03, 0.06, 0.09) alloys were systematically studied. The results demonstrated that the matrix phase of the Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe1.95-xTix (x=0.03, 0.06, 0.09) alloys consisted predominantly of the Laves phase with MgCu2 structure. After Ti addition, the lattice parameter of the Laves phase in the alloys was decreased by substituting rare earth elements Tb and Dy, and the formation of the TiFe2 phase as the primary phase made the solidifying liquid become rich in rare earths and suppressed the formation of the deleterious RFe3 (R=Tb and Dy) phase. Ti was found to be soluble in the matrix RFe2 and R-rich phases and formed the matrix (R, Ti)Fe2 and (R, Ti)-rich phases. The concentration of Ti affected the magnetostriction significantly. The improvement in magnetostriction was maximum for the Ti-added alloys with a low concentration of the Ti (x=0.03) as compared to the parent alloy Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe1.95. However, the decrease in magnetostriction at a higher concentration (x=0.09) was due to the formation of paramagnetic phases TiFe2 and (R, Ti)-rich. Whereas the magnetostriction had little improvement as compared to the parent alloy\linebreak Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe1.95.

参考文献

[1] Clark A E. Ferromagnetic Materials. Vol.1 Amsterdam: North–Holland, 1980: 531

[2] Clark A E, Abbundi R, Gilmor W R. IEEE Trans Magn, 1978; 14: 542

[3] Clark A E, Teter J P, McMasters O D. J Appl Phys, 1988; 63: 3910

[4] Branwood A, Janio A L, Pierey A R. J Appl Phys, 1987; 61: 3796

[5] Teter J P, Clark A E, McMasters O D. J Appl Phys, 1987; 61: 3787

[6] Jiles D C. Acta Mater, 2003; 51: 5907

[7] Greenough R D, Shulze M P, Jenner A G I, Wilkinson A J. IEEE Trans Magn, 1991; 27: 5346

[8] Jiles D C. J Appl Phys, 1994; 27: 1

[9] Zhang T L, Jiang C B, Zhang H, Xu H B. Smart Mater Struct, 2004; 13: 473

[10] Zhang M C, Gao X X, Zhou S Z, Shi Z H. J Alloys Compd, 2004; 381: 226

[11] Clark A E, Wun–Fogle M, Restorff J B, Lograsso T A, Cullen J R. IEEE Trans Magn, 2001; 37: 2678

[12] Ma T Y, Jiang C B, Xiao F, Xu H B. J Alloys Compd, 2006; 414: 276

[13] Liu H Y, Li Y X, Meng F B. J Alloys Compd, 2006; 408: 133

[14] Palit M, Pandian S, Balamuralikrishnan R, Singh A K, Das N, Chandrasekaran V, Markandeyulu G. J Appl Phys, 2006; 100: 074913

[15] Clark A E, Teter J P, Wun–Fogle M. J Appl Phys, 1991; 69: 5771

[16] Teter J P, Clark A E, Wun–Fogle M. IEEE Trans Magn, 1990; 26: 1748

[17] Zhou S Z, Gao X X, Zhang M C, Zhao Q, Shi Z H. J Mater Sci Technol, 2000; 16: 175

[18] Zhao Y, Jiang C B, Zhang H, Xu H B. J Alloys Compd, 2003; 354: 263

[19] Li K S, Xu J, Yang H C, Yuan Y Q, Yu D B, Ying Q M, Zhang S G. J Alloys Compd, 2004; 43: 8032

[20] Wang B W, Wu C H, Chuang Y C, Jin X M, Li J Y. J Alloys Compd, 1996; 237: 58

[21] Shi Y G, Tang S L, Yu J Y, Zhai L, Zhang X K, Du YW, Yang C P. J Appl Phys, 2009; 105: 07A925

[22] Pandian S, Chandrasekaran V, Markandeyulu G, Iyer K J L, Rama Rao K V S. J Appl Phys, 2002; 92: 6082

[23] Wang BW, Wu C H, Deng W, Tang S L, Jin X M, Chuang Y C, Li J Y. J Appl Phys, 1996; 79: 2587

[24] Guo H Q, Yang H Y, Shen B G, Yang L Y, Li R Q. J Alloys Compd, 1990; 190: 255

[25] Cui Y, Jiang C B, Xu H B. Acta Metall Sin, 2011; 47: 214

(崔 跃, 蒋成保, 徐惠彬. 金属学报, 2011; 47: 214)

[26] Westwood P, Abell J S. J Appl Phys, 1990; 67: 998

[27] Chelvane J A, Palit M, Basumatary H, Pandian S, Chandrasekaran V. Scr Mater, 2009; 61: 548

[28] Mei W, Okane T, Umeda T. J Alloys Compd, 1997; 248: 132
文章导航

/