Research paper

Analysis of the Correlation Between the Energy and Crystallographic Orientation of Grain Boundaries in Fe Based on Atomistic Simulations

  • HUANG Zengxin ,
  • JIANG Yihang ,
  • LAI Chunming ,
  • WU Qingjie ,
  • LIU Dahai ,
  • YANG Liang
Expand
  • 1.Engineering Training Center, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, China
    2.School of Aeronautical Manufacturing Engineering, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, China
    3.School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Hunan Chemical Vocational Technology College, Zhuzhou 412000, China
LIU Dahai, professor, Tel: 15180185399, E-mail: dhliu@nchu.edu.cn
YANG Liang, Tel: 17770181534, E-mail: L.yang@nchu.edu.cn

Received date: 2023-04-17

  Revised date: 2023-09-06

  Online published: 2023-09-28

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(52065045);Program Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Jiangxi(20192BCBL23002)

Abstract

The grain boundary (GB) energy is one of the fundamental structure-dependent properties of GB and plays a crucial role in the GB-related behaviors and properties of polycrystalline materials. An in-depth understanding of GB energy will help to explore the corresponding mechanisms and provide significant guidance for tailoring material properties based on GB engineering. The crystallographic orientation of GB strongly dominates the GB energy. However, a relatively comprehensive understanding of the orientation dependence of the GB energy is still lacking, especially for bcc materials. In this study, the energies of 1568 tilt GBs in bcc Fe, which covers the misorientation angle (θ) of 0°-180° and 40 distinct misorientation axes ( O ), were computed using the cutoff sphere bicrystal molecular dynamics model. The energy dataset was used to statistically analyze the correlation between GB energy (γ) and GB crystallographic orientation, thereby revealing the underlying mechanisms. The results show that the tendencies of γ-θ correlationcan be considerably different in the high-angle range for GBs with distinct O. Statistically, GB energies increase with θ and disorientation angle in the low-angle range and then level off for higher angles. The energies for noncoincident site lattice (non-CSL) GBs are not necessarily higher than those of CSL GBs and follow the same trend in the low-θ range as CSL GBs. The energies of the tilt GBs decrease with the variation of O from the central regions to the edge and then the corners of the stereographic triangle due to the increasing tendency of the symmetry of the boundary structure. Therefore, the lowest energies are observed for GBs with O close to <111>. Relatively low energies are not observed for GBs terminated by low-index or dense planes. The GB energy shows an overall increasing trend with the surface energy of the boundary plane until a plateau in the GB energy is reached. No distinct correlation is observed between the GB energy and coincidence index (Σ) value. However, the cusp in the γ(θ) curve for GBs with a common O is found to be generally located at the GB with a much lower Σ than its neighboring GBs. Additionally, the potential correlations and laws concerning GB energy and its crystallographic orientation for bcc metals are observed to be partially similar or consistent with those of fcc metals.

Cite this article

HUANG Zengxin , JIANG Yihang , LAI Chunming , WU Qingjie , LIU Dahai , YANG Liang . Analysis of the Correlation Between the Energy and Crystallographic Orientation of Grain Boundaries in Fe Based on Atomistic Simulations[J]. Acta Metall Sin, 2024 , 60(9) : 1289 -1298 . DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2023.00172

References

1 Read W T, Shockley W. Dislocation models of crystal grain boundaries [J]. Phys. Rev., 1950, 78: 275
2 Liu F, Kirchheim R. Nano-scale grain growth inhibited by reducing grain boundary energy through solute segregation [J]. J. Cryst. Growth, 2004, 264: 385
3 Hu J, Shi Y N, Sauvage X, et al. Grain boundary stability governs hardening and softening in extremely fine nanograined metals [J]. Science, 2017, 355: 1292
4 Humphreys J, Rohrer G S, Rollett A D. Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena [M]. 3rd Ed., Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2017: 294
5 Xu K, Liang T, Zhang Z S, et al. Grain boundary and misorientation angle-dependent thermal transport in single-layer MoS2 [J]. Nanoscale, 2022, 14: 1241
6 Rohrer G S. Grain boundary energy anisotropy: A review [J]. J. Mater. Sci., 2011, 46: 5881
7 Coffman V R, Sethna J P. Grain boundary energies and cohesive strength as a function of geometry [J]. Phys. Rev., 2008, 77B: 44111
8 Olmsted D L, Foiles S M, Holm E A. Survey of computed grain boundary properties in face-centered cubic metals: I. Grain boundary energy [J]. Acta Mater., 2009, 57: 3694
9 Sutton A P, Banks E P, Warwick A R. The five-dimensional parameter space of grain boundaries [J]. Proc. Roy. Soc., 2015, 471A: 20150442
10 Gjostein N A, Rhines F N. Absolute interfacial energies of [001] tilt and twist grain boundaries in copper [J]. Acta Metall., 1959, 7: 319
11 Feng Y X, Shang J X, Liu Z H, et al. The energy and structure of (110) twist grain boundary in tungsten [J]. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 357: 262
12 Yang C C, Rollett A D, Mullins W W. Measuring relative grain boundary energies and mobilities in an aluminum foil from triple junction geometry [J]. Scr. Mater., 2001, 44: 2735
13 Wolf D. Structure-energy correlation for grain boundaries in F.C.C. metals—I. Boundaries on the (111) and (100) planes [J]. Acta Metall., 1989, 37: 1983
14 Wolf D. Structure-energy correlation for grain boundaries in F.C.C. metals—II. Boundaries on the (110) and (113) planes [J]. Acta Metall., 1989, 37: 2823
15 Wolf D. Structure-energy correlation for grain boundaries in F.C.C. metals—III. Symmetrical tilt boundaries [J]. Acta Metall. Mater., 1990, 38: 781
16 Liang C P, Wang W Q, Tang S, et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of symmetrical tilt grain boundary of body-centered cubic tungsten [J]. Chin. J. Nonferrous Met., 2021, 31: 1757
  梁超平, 王文琦, 唐 赛 等. 钨对称倾斜晶界的分子动力学计算模拟 [J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2021, 31: 1757
17 Tschopp M A, McDowell D L. Asymmetric tilt grain boundary structure and energy in copper and aluminium [J]. Philos. Mag., 2007, 87: 3871
18 Wolf D. On the relationship between symmetrical tilt, twist, “special”, and “favored” grain boundaries [J]. J. Phys. Coll., 1985, 46: C4-197
19 Merkle K L. High-resolution electron microscopy of grain boundaries [J]. Interface Sci., 1995, 2: 311
20 Yang L, Lai C M, Li S Y. Atomistic simulations of energies for arbitrary grain boundaries. Part II: Statistical analysis of energies for tilt and twist grain boundaries [J]. Comput. Mater. Sci., 2019, 162: 268
21 Kim H K, Ko W S, Lee H J, et al. An identification scheme of grain boundaries and construction of a grain boundary energy database [J]. Scr. Mater., 2011, 64: 1152
22 Ratanaphan S, Olmsted D L, Bulatov V V, et al. Grain boundary energies in body-centered cubic metals [J]. Acta Mater., 2015, 88: 346
23 Ratanaphan S, Boonkird T, Sarochawikasit R, et al. Atomistic simulations of grain boundary energies in tungsten [J]. Mater. Lett., 2017, 186: 116
24 Lee B J, Choi S H. Computation of grain boundary energies [J]. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2004, 12: 621
25 Li S Y, Yang L, Lai C M. Atomistic simulations of energies for arbitrary grain boundaries. Part I: Model and validation [J]. Comput. Mater. Sci., 2019, 161: 330
26 Morawiec A. Method to calculate the grain boundary energy distribution over the space of macroscopic boundary parameters from the geometry of triple junctions [J]. Acta Mater., 2000, 48: 3525
27 Li J, Dillon S J, Rohrer G S. Relative grain boundary area and energy distributions in nickel [J]. Acta Mater., 2009, 57: 4304
28 Lee B J, Baskes M I, Kim H, et al. Second nearest-neighbor modified embedded atom method potentials for bcc transition metals [J]. Phys. Rev., 2001, 64B: 184102
29 Plimpton S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics [J]. J. Comput. Phys., 1995, 117: 1
30 Sutton A P, Balluffi R W. On geometric criteria for low interfacial energy [J]. Acta Metall., 1987, 35: 2177
31 Yu Q, Nosonovsky M, Esche S K. Monte Carlo simulation of grain growth of single-phase systems with anisotropic boundary energies [J]. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2009, 51: 434
32 Chun Y B, Semiatin S L, Hwang S K. Monte Carlo modeling of microstructure evolution during the static recrystallization of cold-rolled, commercial-purity titanium [J]. Acta Mater., 2006, 54: 3673
33 Wolf D. Structure and energy of general grain boundaries in bcc metals [J]. J. Appl. Phys., 1991, 69: 185
34 Wolf D. A broken-bond model for grain boundaries in face-centered cubic metals [J]. J. Appl. Phys., 1990, 68: 3221
35 Brokman A, Balluffi R W. Coincidence lattice model for the structure and energy of grain boundaries [J]. Acta Metall., 1981, 29: 1703
36 Randle V. The role of the grain boundary plane in cubic polycrystals [J]. Acta Mater., 1998, 46: 1459
Outlines

/