Please wait a minute...
Acta Metall Sin  2020, Vol. 56 Issue (6): 885-897    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2019.00302
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Corrosion Behavior of Damaged Epoxy Coated Steel Bars Under the Coupling Effect of Chloride Ion and Carbonization
WEI Jie1, WEI Yinghua2, LI Jing2, ZHAO Hongtao2, LV Chenxi2, DONG Junhua1(), KE Wei3, HE Xiaoyan3
1.Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
2.Shenyang Research and Development Center for Advanced Materials, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
3.Environmental Corrosion Center, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
Cite this article: 

WEI Jie, WEI Yinghua, LI Jing, ZHAO Hongtao, LV Chenxi, DONG Junhua, KE Wei, HE Xiaoyan. Corrosion Behavior of Damaged Epoxy Coated Steel Bars Under the Coupling Effect of Chloride Ion and Carbonization. Acta Metall Sin, 2020, 56(6): 885-897.

Download:  HTML  PDF(5035KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

It is unavoidable for coated steel bars to be scratched during transportation and construction, which will lead to the damage of coating and exposure of steel matrix. Consequently, the corrosion resistance of coated steel bars after damage will directly affect the durability of structures. The corrosion evolution behavior of damaged epoxy coated steel bars under the coupling action of chloride ion and carbonization was studied by comparing with bare steel bars and perfectly coated steel bars. On the basis of characterizing the composition and structural characteristics of epoxy coating, the corrosion morphology and product composition at the damage site of the coating were analyzed by CLSM and Raman spectroscopy, and the corrosion process was monitored by corrosion potential and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy to reveal the dynamic of corrosion evolution. The results show that the epoxy coating without damage has a good protective effect on steel matrix, and no corrosion occurs during long-term immersion in all six solutions including the chloride ions and carbonization corrosive environments. The corrosion activation or passivation behavior of damaged coated steel bars is consistent with that of uncoated bare bars, which is obviously affected by chloride ion and carbonization. Passivation occurs in the system without Cl- and with pH of 12.6 or 9.8. Activation dissolution occurs in the chloride-free system with pH of 9.2, and in the system of different pH values with 0.6 mol/L NaCl. In the active systems, the corrosion rate increases with time. In the chloride-free system, the corrosion products after long-term corrosion are mainly α-FeOOH, while in the chloride-containing system with different pH, the corrosion products contain not only α-FeOOH, but also β-FeOOH and a small amount of Fe3O4. Under the coupling action of chloride ion and carbonization, the corrosion of damaged coated steel bars occurs only in the damaged site, and the corrosion extends towards to the depth of the matrix, which will not cause the peeling of coatings in other sites.

Key words:  epoxy coated steel bar      corrosion evolution      chloride ion      carbonization     
Received:  11 September 2019     
ZTFLH:  TG172.2  
Fund: National Natural Science Foundation of China(51501201);Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDA13040501);Shenyang Key Research and Development and Technology Transfer Program(Z17-7-021)

URL: 

https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/10.11900/0412.1961.2019.00302     OR     https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/Y2020/V56/I6/885

SolutionComposition / (mol·L-1)pH
NaOHKOHCa(OH)2Na2CO3NaHCO3NaClvalue
S10.020.060.00212.6
S20.020.060.0020.612.6
S30.0230.0349.8
S40.0230.0340.69.8
S50.00730.06579.2
S60.00730.06570.69.2
Table 1  Solution compositions for corrosion test
Fig.1  Low (a) and high (b) magnified SEM surface images of steel bar specimen with intact coating
Fig.2  Low (a) and high (b) magnified SEM cross-section images of steel bar specimen with intact coating
Fig.3  SEM-BSE image (a) and EDS analysis along the line in Fig.3a (b) of coating
Fig.4  SEM-SE (a) and SEM-BSE (b) images of the steel bar specimen with prefabricated damage coating
Fig.5  Corrosion morphologies of bare steel (a1~f1), intact coated steel (a2~f2) and damaged coated steel (a3~f3) immersed in solutions S1 (a1~a3), S2 (b1~b3), S3 (c1~c3), S4 (d1~d3), S5 (e1~e3) and S6 (f1~f3) for 60 d
Color online
Steel sampleS1S2S3S4S5S6
BarePassivationActivationPassivationActivationActivationActivation
Intact coatedUnchangedUnchangedUnchangedUnchangedUnchangedUnchanged
Damaged coatedPassivationActivationPassivationActivationActivationActivation
Table 2  Corrosion conditions of three different steel bars immersed in solutions S1~S6 for 60 d
Fig.6  CLSM three-dimensional morphologies of steel bar specimen with prefabricated damaged coatings immersed in solutions S1~S6 (a~f) for 60 d
Color online
Fig.7  Longitudinal section contour maps of pits in steel bar specimen with prefabricated damaged coating immersed in solutions S1~S6 (a~f) for 60 d
Fig.8  Raman spectra of corrosion products in pits of steel bar specimen with prefabricated damaged coating in activated corrosion systems S2, S4~S6
Fig.9  Open circuit potential(EOCP) evolution of steel bar specimen with prefabricated damaged coating in solutions S1~S4 (a) and S5, S6 (b)
Fig.10  Nyquist (a1~f1), Bode impedance modulus (a2~f2) and Bode phase angle (a3~f3) plots evolution of steel bar specimen with prefabricated damage coatings in solutions S1 (a1~a3), S2 (b1~b3), S3 (c1~c3), S4 (d1~d3), S5 (e1~e3) and S6 (f1~f3) (ZIm—imaginary part of impedance, ZRe—real part of impedance, |Z|— impedance modulus)
Color online
Fig.11  Schematics of equivalent circuit models for EIS fitting of solutions S1~S6
(a) passivation system of S1 and S3 (Rs—solution resistance, Rc—polarization resistance of cathodic oxygen reduction, Qc—cathode oxygen reduction capacitance, Ra—charge transfer resistance, Qa—double layer capacitance)
(b) activation system of S2, S4~S6 (Zw—Warburg resistance)

Time

d

Rs

Ω·cm2

Qc-Y0

10-3 Ω-1·cm-2·s-n

nc

Rc

Ω·cm2

Qa-Y0

10-3 Ω-1·cm-2·s-n

na

Ra

Ω·cm2

χ2
02.201.040.9712681.470.7433978.78×10-4
12.181.170.971.487×1040.890.8062587.24×10-4
52.101.070.964.171×1040.890.8072769.17×10-4
202.400.850.947.250×1040.980.7691929.76×10-4
602.770.750.916.431×1041.090.7696658.01×10-4
Table 3  Fitting results of EIS data in S1 solution

Time

d

Rs

Ω·cm2

Qc-Y0

10-3 Ω-1·cm-2·s-n

nc

Rc

Ω·cm2

Zw

10-3 Ω-1·cm-2·s-0.5

Qa-Y0

10-3 Ω-1·cm-2·s-n

na

Ra

Ω·cm2

χ2
00.4812.040.75618.906.821.140.821311.02.77×10-4
10.4613.490.76114.5013.491.750.77842.76.34×10-4
50.482.070.7352.8818.493.010.75211.36.06×10-4
200.555.830.709.7858.6011.740.7930.53.43×10-4
600.517.600.702.6768.8930.980.6622.41.11×10-4
Table 4  Fitting results of EIS data in S2 solution

Time

d

Rs

Ω·cm2

Qc-Y0

10-3 Ω-1·cm-2·s-n

nc

Rc

Ω·cm2

Qa-Y0

10-3 Ω-1·cm-2·s-n

na

Ra

Ω·cm2

χ2
06.061.280.9716671.100.7651654.89×10-4
15.856.170.9740380.860.7854356.08×10-4
55.731.031.003.060×1040.560.8250858.55×10-4
205.300.931.003.036×1040.490.8367075.62×10-4
604.630.891.002.502×1040.440.8481621.81×10-4
Table 5  Fitting results of EIS data in S3 solution

Time

d

Rs

Ω·cm2

Qc-Y0

10-3 Ω-1·cm-2·s-n

nc

Rc

Ω·cm2

Zw

10-3 Ω-1·cm-2·s-0.5

Qa-Y0

10-3 Ω-1·cm-2·s-n

na

Ra

Ω·cm2

χ2
00.937.210.7536.2413.8631.960.79277.802.26×10-4
10.9511.230.7328.8626.5422.300.76255.601.98×10-4
50.908.530.7223.4629.7342.220.80107.605.08×10-4
201.006.350.6913.4656.05197.900.6876.922.15×10-4
601.7210.890.427.5970.7672.730.9059.601.26×10-4
Table 6  Fitting results of EIS data in S4 solution

Time

d

Rs

Ω·cm2

Qc-Y0

10-3 Ω-1·cm-2·s-n

nc

Rc

Ω·cm2

Zw

10-3 Ω-1·cm-2·s-0.5

Qa-Y0

10-3 Ω-1·cm-2·s-n

na

Ra

Ω·cm2

χ2
05.339.100.83477.506.383.060.731614.29.92×10-4
15.4710.400.7973.447.4924.650.41512.95.19×10-4
53.7978.030.7781.3210.8283.140.29467.42.19×10-4
202.87152.400.7676.148.5062.600.24187.62.03×10-4
602.6642.270.6869.358.6421.120.2470.62.57×10-4
Table 7  Fitting results of EIS data in S5 solution

Time

d

Rs

Ω·cm2

Qc-Y0

10-3 Ω-1·cm-2·s-n

nc

Rc

Ω·cm2

Zw

10-3 Ω-1·cm-2·s-0.5

Qa-Y0

10-3 Ω-1·cm-2·s-n

na

Ra

Ω·cm2

χ2
00.452.880.8831.1947.333.830.80206.85.76×10-4
10.656.760.818.5473.5810.190.74261.83.53×10-4
50.726.450.8512.6362.4010.740.73258.34.92×10-4
200.893.140.8215.28100.1017.150.60229.27.98×10-4
602.420.830.8011.9545.2035.680.2987.93.75×10-4
Table 8  Fitting results of EIS data in S6 solution
Fig.12  Evolutions of Rc (a) and Ra (b)with time in solutions S1~S6
[1] Jin W L, Zhao Y X. Durability of Concrete Structures [M]. 2nd Ed., Beijing: Science Press, 2014: 15
金伟良, 赵羽习. 混凝土结构耐久性 [M]. 第2版,北京: 科学出版社, 2014: 15
[2] Morris W, Vazquez M. Corrosion of reinforced concrete exposed to marine environment [J]. Corros. Rev., 2002, 20: 469
doi: 10.1515/CORRREV.2002.20.6.469
[3] Moreno M, Moms W, Alvarez M G, et al. Corrosion of reinforcing steel in simulated concrete pore solutions: Effect of carbonation and chloride content [J]. Corros. Sci., 2004, 46: 2681
doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2004.03.013
[4] Abd Elmoaty A E M. Four-years carbonation and chloride induced steel corrosion of sulfate-contaminated aggregates concrete [J]. Constr. Build. Mater., 2018, 163: 539
doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.128
[5] Wang X H, Gao Y. Corrosion behavior of epoxy-coated reinforced bars in RC test specimens subjected to pre-exposure loading and wetting-drying cycles [J]. Constr. Build. Mater., 2016, 119: 185
doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.066
[6] Zafeiropoulou T, Rakanta E, Batis G. Performance evaluation of organic coatings against corrosion in reinforced cement mortars [J]. Prog. Org. Coat., 2011, 72: 175
doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2011.04.005
[7] Ahmad S, Al-Tholaia M M H. Evaluation of corrosion resistance of coated steel strips embedded in mortar under chloride exposure [J]. Anti-Corros. Methods Mater., 2015, 62: 29
doi: 10.1108/ACMM-10-2013-1301
[8] Cheng A, Huang R, Wu J K, et al. Effect of rebar coating on corrosion resistance and bond strength of reinforced concrete [J]. Constr. Build. Mater., 2005, 19: 404
doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.07.006
[9] Zhou Q, Shui Z H, Xiao Y D, et al. Effects of coating/electroplating on corrosion resistance of steel bar in reinforced concrete [J]. Adv. Mater. Res., 2012, 446-449: 3176
[10] Nguyen T, Martin J W. Modes and mechanisms for the degradation of fusion-bonded epoxy-coated steel in a marine concrete environment [J]. JCT Res., 2004, 1: 81
[11] Lau K, Sagüés A A. Corrosion of epoxy- and polymer/zinc-coated rebar in simulated concrete pore solution [J]. Corrosion, 2009, 65: 681
doi: 10.5006/1.3319095
[12] Venkatesan P, Palaniswamy N, Rajagopal K. Corrosion performance of coated reinforcing bars embedded in concrete and exposed to natural marine environment [J]. Prog. Org. Coat., 2006, 56: 8
doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2006.01.011
[13] Tang F J, Chen G D, Brow R K. Chloride-induced corrosion mechanism and rate of enamel- and epoxy-coated deformed steel bars embedded in mortar [J]. Cem. Concr. Res., 2016, 82: 58
doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.12.015
[14] Singh D D N, Ghosh R. Unexpected deterioration of fusion-bonded epoxy-coated rebars embedded in chloride-contaminated concrete environments [J]. Corrosion, 2005, 61: 815
doi: 10.5006/1.3278216
[15] Pianca F, Schell H, Cautillo G. The performance of epoxy coated reinforcement: Experience of the Ontario ministry of transportation [J]. Int. J. Mater. Prod. Technol., 2005, 23: 286
[16] Montes P, Brernnor T W, Kondratova I. Eighteen-year performance of epoxy-coated rebar in a tunnel structure subjected to a very aggressive chloride-contaminated environment [J]. Corrosion, 2004, 60: 974
doi: 10.5006/1.3287832
[17] Ş Erdoğdu, Bremner T W, Kondratova I L. Accelerated testing of plain and epoxy-coated reinforcement in simulated seawater and chloride solutions [J]. Cem. Concr. Res., 2001, 31: 861
doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00487-2
[18] Elleithy W M, Sharif A M, Al-Amoudi O S B, et al. Effect of holidays and surface damage to FBEC on reinforcement corrosion [J]. Constr. Build. Mater., 1998, 12: 185
doi: 10.1016/S0950-0618(98)00004-X
[19] Keβler S, Angst U, Zintel M, et al. Defects in epoxy-coated reinforcement and their impact on the service life of a concrete structure: A study of critical chloride content and macro-cell corrosion [J]. Struct. Concr., 2015, 16: 398
doi: 10.1002/suco.v16.3
[20] Al-Dulaijan S U, Maslehuddin M, Shameem M, et al. Corrosion protection provided by chemical inhibitors to damaged FBEC bars [J]. Constr. Build. Mater., 2012, 29: 487
doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.009
[21] Cao F T, Wei J, Dong J H, et al. The corrosion inhibition effect of phytic acid on 20SiMn steel in simulated carbonated concrete pore solution [J]. Corros. Sci., 2015, 100: 365
doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2015.08.020
[22] Zhao H T. Failure behavior of solvent-free epoxy coating in simulated dynamic sea water [D]. Shenyang: Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2016
赵洪涛. 无溶剂环氧防腐涂层在模拟动态海水中的失效行为 [D]. 沈阳: 中国科学院金属研究所, 2016
[23] de la Fuente D, Alcántara J, Chico B, et al. Characterisation of rust surfaces formed on mild steel exposed to marine atmospheres using XRD and SEM/Micro-Raman techniques [J]. Corros. Sci., 2016, 110: 253
doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2016.04.034
[24] Dubois F, Mendibide C, Pagnier T, et al. Raman mapping of corrosion products formed onto spring steels during salt spray experiments. A correlation between the scale composition and the corrosion resistance [J]. Corros. Sci., 2008, 50: 3401
doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.09.027
[25] Lu Y F, Dong J H, Ke W. Effects of Cl- ions on the corrosion behaviour of low alloy steel in deaerated bicarbonate solutions [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2016, 32: 341
doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2015.11.015
[26] Wei J, Fu X X, Dong J H, et al. Corrosion evolution of reinforcing steel in concrete under dry/wet cyclic conditions contaminated with chloride [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2012, 28: 905
doi: 10.1016/S1005-0302(12)60149-2
[27] Wei J, Dong J H, Ke W. Corrosion evolution of scaled rebar in concrete under dry/wet cyclic condition in 3.5% NaCl solution [J]. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 2013, 8: 2536
[28] Liu B, Mu X, Yang Y, et al. Effect of tin addition on corrosion behavior of a low-alloy steel in simulated costal-industrial atmosphere [J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2019, 35: 1228
doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.01.008
[29] Cao C N. Principles of Corrosion Electrochemistry [M]. 2nd Ed., Beijing: Chemistry Industry Press, 2004: 261
曹楚南. 腐蚀电化学原理 [M]. 第2版, 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2004: 261
[1] ZHONG Xiaocong, JIANG Liangxing, LÜ Xiaojun, LAI Yanqing, LI Jie, LIU Yexiang. EFFECTS OF CHLORIDE ION ON THE ELECTRO- CHEMICAL BEHAVIOR OF Pb-Ag-RE ALLOY ANODE[J]. 金属学报, 2015, 51(3): 378-384.
[2] ZHANG Peng ZHANG Fucheng WANG Tiansheng. PREPARATION AND MICROSTRUCTURE OF HARD BAINITE IN SURFACE LAYER OF CARBURIZED 20CrMnMoAl STEEL[J]. 金属学报, 2011, 47(8): 1038-1045.
[3] WANG Lei ZHANG Sixun DONG Junhua KE Wei LIU Chunming . SURFACE CRAZING OF Mn–Cu WEATHERING STEEL[J]. 金属学报, 2010, 46(6): 723-728.
[4] WU Xiaojun CHENG Wen QIAO Shengru ZOU Wu ZHANG Peng ZHANG Xiaohu. EVOLUTION OF PORES IN C/C COMPOSITE DURING RESIN IMPREGNATION-CARBONIZATION[J]. 金属学报, 2009, 45(11): 1402-1408.
[5] Shu-Tao WANG; Kewei GAO. CORROSION BEHAVIOR AND VARIATION OF APPARENT MECHANICAL PROPERTY OF ONE NEWLY-DEVELOPED LOW CARBON BAINITIC STEEL IN ENVIRONMENT CONTAINING CHLORIDE ION[J]. 金属学报, 2008, 44(9): 1116-1124 .
[6] . STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF CHLORIDE IONS ON THE PASSIVE FILM ON REINFORCING STEEL IN SIMULATED CONCRETE PORE SOLUTIONS BY ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNIQUES[J]. 金属学报, 2008, 44(3): 346-350 .
[7] LIAO Jiaxing; JIANG Yiming; WU Weiwei; ZHONG Cheng; LI Jin; SONG Hongwei. THE INFLUENCE OF SULPHATE ION ON THE CRITICAL PITTING CORROSION TEMPERATURE OF 316 STAINLESS STEEL IN AQUEOUS SOLUTION CONTAINING CHLORIDE ION[J]. 金属学报, 2006, 42(11): 1187-1190 .
[8] WANG Zhi; BI Shiwen; YANG Yihong. Effects of Additives on Particle Size and Strength of Carbonization Product in Sodium Aluminate Liquors[J]. 金属学报, 2004, 40(9): 1005-1008 .
[9] HUANG Yanliang; JIANG Xiaoxia; LI Shizhuo (Institute of Metal Research; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Shenyang 110015)(Manuscript received 1995-03-13; in revised form 1995-07-01). CORROSIVE WEAR OF STAINLESS STEEL IN Cl~-+H_2SO_4 SOLUTION UNDER LOW LOADS[J]. 金属学报, 1996, 32(1): 57-62.
[10] LIU Miaoxiu;CHENG Zhaonian;CHEN Nianyi;KE Jiajun Shanghai Institute of Metallurgy; Academia Sinica Institute of Chemical Metallurgy; Academia Sinica; Beijing. FACTORS AFFECTING SILICA CONTENT OF ALUMINIUM HYDROXIDE PRODUCT IN CARBONIZATION PROCESS[J]. 金属学报, 1990, 26(5): 156-159.
No Suggested Reading articles found!