Mechanism Study on Hot Ductility of 2.25Cr1Mo Alloy Based on Non-Equilibrium Grain-Boundary Segregation
Kai WANG1,2(),Liu LIU1,Tingdong XU1,2,Xuedong DONG3
1 Central Iron and Steel Research Institute, Beijing 100081, China 2 Beijing Key Laboratory of Advanced High Temperature Materials, Central Iron and Steel Research Institute,Beijing 100081, China 3 Dongbei Special Steel Group Co., LTD., Dalian 116105, China
Cite this article:
Kai WANG,Liu LIU,Tingdong XU,Xuedong DONG. Mechanism Study on Hot Ductility of 2.25Cr1Mo Alloy Based on Non-Equilibrium Grain-Boundary Segregation. Acta Metall Sin, 2017, 53(3): 345-350.
Almost all ductile metals and alloys have a ductility minimum in the intermediate temperature range at about from 0.5 to 0.8 melt point, with an intergranular fracture mode l (intermediate temperature brittleness, ITB, or intermediate temperature ductility minimum, ITDM). That was found in Ni-based alloys, Fe-based alloys, Co-based alloys, Ti-based alloys, intermetallic compounds and Al-Mg alloys. One of the problems specific to the continuous casting of steels is transverse cracking, which is induced by the ITB of steel, called as hot ductility. The mechanisms suggested are mostly related to the especial properties such as ferrite mechanism for steels and precipitates mechanism at grain-boundaries. It is clear that the ferrite mechanism cannot clarify the ITB of austenitic steels and the precipitates mechanism cannot clarify that of metals and alloys which have no precipitates at grain-boundaries. In this work, based on the prior works for single-phase and phase transition alloys, the mechanism of hot-ductility for 2.25Cr1Mo alloy was analyzed by using Gleeble machine and Auger spectroscopy (AES). The results show the ductility minimum near 850 ℃ corresponds to the maximum concentration of the impurity sulfur at grain boundaries. And the hot ductility of 2.25Cr1Mo alloy can be explained reasonably by non-equilibrium grain-boundary segregation of sulfur.
Fig.1 Schematic of hot ductility for 2.25Cr1Mo alloy(WQ—water quenching)
Fig.2 Curve of area reduction (Z) and temperature of 2.25Cr1Mo alloy
Fig.3 Tensile fracture morphologies of 2.25Cr1Mo alloy at 600 ℃ (a), 700 ℃ (b), 850 ℃ (c), 900 ℃ (d) and 1100 ℃ (e)
Fig.4 Tensile fracture microstructures of 2.25Cr1Mo alloy at 700 ℃ (a) and 850 ℃ (b)
Fig.5 Fracture microstructures of 2.25Cr1Mo alloy at 850 ℃ with cooling rates of 20 ℃/s (a) and 100 ℃/s (b)
Fig.6 AES spectra of 2.25Cr1Mo alloy grain-boundary cooled to 700 ℃ (a), 850 ℃ (b) and 1000 ℃ (c) with 20 ℃/s
[1]
Lankford W T.Some considerations of strength and ductility in the continuous-casting process[J]. Metall. Trans., 1972, 3: 1331
[2]
Mintz B, Yue S, Jonas J J.Hot ductility of steels and its relationship to the problem of transverse cracking during continuous casting[J]. Int. Mater. Rev., 1991, 36: 187
[3]
Mintz B.The influence of composition on the hot ductility of steels and to the problem of transverse cracking[J]. ISIJ Int., 1999, 39: 833
[4]
Suzuki H G, Takakura E, Eylon D.Hot strength and hot ductility of titanium alloys—a challenge for continuous casting process[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 1999, A263: 230
[5]
Horikawa K, Kuramoto S, Kanno M.Intergranular fracture caused by trace impurities in an Al-5.5mol%Mg alloy[J]. Acta Mater., 2001, 49: 3981
Pike L M, Liu C T.Environmental effects on the tensile properties of two Ni3Si-based alloys[J]. Scr. Mater., 2000, 42: 265
[8]
Wang K, Xu T D, Wang Y Q, et al.Intermediate-temperature embrittlement induced by non-equilibrium grain-boundary segregation of sulfur in Ni-Cr-Fe alloy[J]. Philos. Mag. Lett., 2009, 89: 725
[9]
Wang K, Xu T D, Song S H, et al.Graphical representation for isothermal kinetics of non-equilibrium grain-boundary segregation[J]. Mater. Char., 2011, 62: 575
[10]
Wang K, Chun Y, Si H.Effect of non-equilibrium grain-boundary segregation of phosphorus on the intermediate-temperature ductility minimum of an Fe-17Cr alloy[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2013, A587: 228
[11]
Xu T D, Wang K, Song S H.Theoretical progress in non-equilibrium grain-boundary segregation (I): Thermally induced non-equilibrium grain-boundary segregation and intergranular embrittlement[J]. Sci. China, 2009, 52E: 893
[12]
Xu T D, Zheng L, Wang K, et al.Unified mechanism of intergranular embrittlement based on non-equilibrium grain boundary segregation[J]. Int. Mater. Rev., 2013, 58: 263
[13]
Chen X M, Song S H, Weng L Q, et al.A consideration of intergranular fracture caused by trace impurity sodium in an Al-5wt.%Mg alloy[J]. Scr. Mater., 2008, 58: 902
[14]
Dong J X, Zhang M C, Xie X S, et al.Interfacial segregation and cosegregation behaviour in a nickel-base alloy 718[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2002, A328: 8
[15]
McLean D. Grain Boundaries in Metals [M]. London: Oxford University Press, 1957: 50
[16]
Xu T D, Cheng B Y.Kinetics of non-equilibrium grain-boundary segregation[J]. Prog. Mater. Sci., 2004, 49: 109
[17]
Xu T D.Non-equilibrium grain-boundary segregation kinetics[J]. J. Mater. Sci., 1987, 22: 337
[18]
Xu T D.The critical time and critical cooling rate of non-equilibrium grain-boundary segregation[J]. J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 1988, 7: 241
[19]
Xu T D, Song S H.A kinetic model of non-equilibrium grain-boundary segregation[J]. Acta Metall., 1989, 37: 2499