1.4%CuHSLA钢的组织和力学性能

  • 杜瑜宾 ,
  • 胡小锋 ,
  • 张守清 ,
  • 宋元元 ,
  • 姜海昌 ,
  • 戎利建
展开
  • 1 中国科学院金属研究所中国科学院核用材料与安全评价重点实验室 沈阳 110016
    2 中国科学技术大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110016
杜瑜宾,男,1993年生,博士生

收稿日期: 2020-01-10

  修回日期: 2020-04-20

  网络出版日期: 2020-05-26

基金资助

国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFB0300601);国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFB1201302);辽宁省“兴辽英才计划”项目(XLYC1907143)

Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of HSLA Steel Containing 1.4%Cu

  • Yubin DU ,
  • Xiaofeng HU ,
  • Shouqing ZHANG ,
  • Yuanyuan SONG ,
  • Haichang JIANG ,
  • Lijian RONG
Expand
  • 1 CAS Key Laboratory of Nuclear Materials and Safety Assessment, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
    2 School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Shenyang 110016, China

Received date: 2020-01-10

  Revised date: 2020-04-20

  Online published: 2020-05-26

Supported by

National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFB0300601);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFB1201302);Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program(XLYC1907143)

摘要

以不含Cu (0Cu)和含1.4%Cu (1.4Cu)的HSLA钢为研究对象,利用OM、SEM、EBSD等技术手段研究了Cu对HSLA合金钢显微组织的影响,利用APT表征了纳米富Cu团簇的析出特征,并通过拉伸和冲击实验测定了合金钢的力学性能。结果表明,淬火态Cu固溶在基体中,经回火后则以富Cu团簇的形式在基体和界面处析出。Cu对回火态HSLA合金钢的原始奥氏体晶粒尺寸、显微组织及有效晶粒尺寸均无明显影响,但对其强度和冲击功影响较大。1.4Cu钢经过450 ℃回火处理后获得最佳强化效果,其屈服强度比0Cu钢提升了143 MPa,此时1.4Cu钢的室温冲击功仅为24 J,断口以河流花样为主,其断裂方式为准解理脆性断裂;而0Cu钢的室温冲击功高达127 J,其断裂方式为韧窝的韧性断裂。APT实验结果表明,2种回火态合金钢的板条界面处均存在C、Cr、Ni、Mn元素的富集。与0Cu钢相比,1.4Cu钢的板条界面处存在大量富Cu团簇,从而导致较大的应力集中,有利于裂纹的萌生,并且板条界面处析出的富Cu团簇会排斥Mo元素,抑制了Mo元素在板条界处的偏聚,相对降低了板条界面处的结合强度,有利于裂纹沿板条界扩展。此外,富Cu团簇在强化基体的同时,也会降低基体的韧性,加快裂纹在基体内的扩展。因而,1.4Cu钢在获得最佳强化效果时其冲击性能较差。

本文引用格式

杜瑜宾 , 胡小锋 , 张守清 , 宋元元 , 姜海昌 , 戎利建 . 含1.4%CuHSLA钢的组织和力学性能[J]. 金属学报, 2020 , 56(10) : 1343 -1354 . DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2020.00012

Abstract

The Cu bearing high strength low alloy (HSLA) steels exhibit high-strength, high toughness and good weldability, which have been widely used in shipbuilding, offshore structures etc. Due to the extremely poor impact energy when attained peak strength, the Cu bearing HSLA steels are usually used at overaged state, which have a good combination of impact energy and strength. In order to clarify the effect of Cu on mechanical properties especially on the impact energy for HSLA steels at peak ageing state, two HSLA steels without Cu (0Cu) and with 1.4%Cu (1.4Cu), were prepared by vacuum induction melting in this study. The influence of Cu on the microstructure of HSLA steel was investigated by OM, SEM and EBSD. Meanwhile, the Cu-riched clusters were characterized by APT and the mechanical properties were measured by tensile test and impact test. The results show that the Cu is completely solid-solutioned into the matrix after quenching, and there are a great number of Cu-riched clusters precipitated in the matrix and boundaries after tempering. Cu element has no obvious effect on the prior austenite grain size, microstructure and effective grain size of tempered HSLA steel, but has significant influence on the strength and impact energy for tempered HSLA steel. After tempered at 450 ℃, the 1.4Cu steel attained the maximum yield strength (1053 MPa), higher than that of 0Cu steel. It is worth noting that the impact energy of 1.4Cu steel tempered at 450 ℃ is only 24 J at room temperature and the impact fracture is a quasi-cleavage brittle fracture mode dominated by river patterns. However, 0Cu steel exhibits a completely ductile fracture mode dominated by dimples at room temperature and the impact energy is 127 J. The APT results show that both 0Cu and 1.4Cu tempered steels have the segregation of C, Cr, Ni, Mn elements at the lath boundary. Compared with 0Cu steel, there precipitate a great number of Cu-riched clusters at the lath boundary for 1.4Cu steel, which will result in the stress concentration and then promote the crack initiation at the lath boundary. In addition, the Cu-rich clusters precipitated at the lath boundary could prevent the Mo segregated at the lath boundary, which will decrease the bonding energy and then promote the crack propagation along the lath boundary. Besides, the negative effect of strengthening due to the Cu-riched clusters at matrix will also accelerate the crack propagation in the matrix, which will decrease the impact energy of 1.4Cu steel. Therefore, the impact energy of 1.4Cu steel is much lower than that of 0Cu steel at room temperature.

参考文献

[1] Jain D, Isheim D, Hunter A H, et al. Multicomponent high-strength low-alloy steel precipitation-strengthened by sub-nanometric Cu precipitates and M2C carbides [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2016, 47A: 3860
[2] Ghosh A, Mishra B, Das S, et al. Structure and properties of a low carbon Cu bearing high strength steel [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2005, A396: 320
[3] Zhang Z W, Liu C T, Wen Y R, et al. Influence of aging and thermomechanical treatments on the mechanical properties of a nanocluster-strengthened ferritic steel [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2011, 43A: 351
[4] Dhua S K, Mukerjee D, Sarma D S. Influence of thermomechanical treatments on the microstructure and mechanical properties of HSLA-100 steel plates [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2003, 34A: 241
[5] Zou Y, Xu Y B, Han D T, et al. Aging characteristics and strengthening behavior of a low-carbon medium-Mn Cu-bearing steel [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2018, A729: 423
[6] Bhagat A N, Pabi S K, Ranganathan S, et al. Aging behaviour in copper bearing high strength low alloy steels [J]. J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 2004, 44: 115
[7] Dhua S K, Mukerjee D, Sarma D S. Influence of tempering on the microstructure and mechanical properties of HSLA-100 steel plates [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 2001, 32A: 2259
[8] Dhua S K, Ray A, Sarma D S. Effect of tempering temperatures on the mechanical properties and microstructures of HSLA-100 type copper-bearing steels [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2001, A318: 197
[9] Ghosh A, Das S, Chatterjee S. Ageing behavior of a Cu-bearing ultrahigh strength steel [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2008, A486: 152
[10] Lee T H, Kim Y O, Kim S J. Crystallographic model for BCC-to-9R martensitic transformation of Cu precipitates in ferritic steel [J]. Philos. Mag., 2007, 87: 209
[11] Othen P J, Jenkins M L, Smith G D W, et al. Transmission electron microscope investigations of the structure of copper precipitates in thermally-aged Fe-Cu and Fe-Cu-Ni [J]. Philos. Mag. Lett., 1991, 64: 383
[12] Kolli R P, Seidman D N. The temporal evolution of the decomposition of a concentrated multicomponent Fe-Cu-based steel [J]. Acta Mater., 2008, 56: 2073
[13] Zhang Z Y, Chai F, Luo X B, et al. The strengthening mechanism of Cu bearing high strength steel as-quenched and tempered and Cu precipitation behavior in steel [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2019, 55: 783
[13] (张正延, 柴 锋, 罗小兵等. 调质态含Cu高强钢的强化机理及钢中Cu的析出行为 [J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55: 783)
[14] Hunter A H. An atom probe tomographic investigation of high-strength, high-toughness precipitation strengthened steels for naval applications [D]. Evanston: Northwestern University, 2012
[15] Kapoor M, Isheim D, Vaynman S, et al. Effects of increased alloying element content on NiAl-type precipitate formation, loading rate sensitivity, and ductility of Cu- and NiAl-precipitation-strengthened ferritic steels [J]. Acta Mater., 2016, 104: 166
[16] Zhao Y, Tong X, Wei X H, et al. Effects of microstructure on crack resistance and low-temperature toughness of ultra-low carbon high strength steel [J]. Int. J. Plast., 2019, 116: 203
[17] Yan J C, Xu H W, Zuo X W, et al. Strategies for strengthening-ductility and hierarchical co-precipitation in multicomponent nano-precipitated steels by Cu partitioning [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2019, A739: 225
[18] Liu Q D, Zhao S J. Cu precipitation on dislocation and interface in quench-aged steel [J]. MRS Commun., 2012, 2: 127
[19] Song Y Y, Zhao M J, Rong L J. Study on the precipitation of γ' in a Fe-Ni base alloy during ageing by APT [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2018, 54: 1236
[19] (宋元元, 赵明久, 戎利建. Fe-Ni基合金时效过程中γ'相析出的原子探针层析技术研究 [J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54: 1236)
[20] Kelly T F, Miller M K. Invited review article: Atom probe tomography [J]. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 2007, 78: 031101
[21] Yu X M, Zhao S J. Study on Cu precipitate of the low C high strength steel containing Cu and Ni during isochronal tempering [J]. Acta Metall. Sin., 2013, 49: 569
[21] (余锡模, 赵世金. 含Cu和Ni低碳高强度钢等时间回火析出富Cu相的研究 [J]. 金属学报, 2013, 49: 569)
[22] Wen Y R, Hirata A, Zhang Z W, et al. Microstructure characterization of Cu-rich nanoprecipitates in a Fe-2.5Cu-1.5Mn-4.0Ni-1.0Al multicomponent ferritic alloy [J]. Acta Mater., 2013, 61: 2133
[23] Zhang Z W. Research development of high strength low alloy (HSLA) steels [J]. Mater. China, 2016, 35(2): 141
[23] (张中武. 高强度低合金钢(HSLA)的研究进展 [J]. 中国材料进展, 2016, 35(2): 141)
[24] Jiao Z B, Luan J H, Zhang Z W, et al. Synergistic effects of Cu and Ni on nanoscale precipitation and mechanical properties of high-strength steels [J]. Acta Mater., 2013, 61: 5996
[25] Li Y J, Ponge D, Choi P, et al. Segregation of boron at prior austenite grain boundaries in a quenched martensitic steel studied by atom probe tomography [J]. Scr. Mater., 2015, 96: 13
[26] Lim N S, Bang C W, Das S, et al. Influence of tempering temperature on both the microstructural evolution and elemental distribution in AISI 4340 steels [J]. Met. Mater. Int., 2012, 18: 87
[27] Cao J C, Yong Q L, Liu Q Y, et al. Solubility formulac of molybdenum in iron matrix [J]. China Molybdenum Ind., 2005, 29(5): 46
[27] (曹建春, 雍岐龙, 刘清友等. 钼在α铁基体中的平衡固溶度公式 [J]. 中国钼业, 2005, 29(5): 46)
[28] Takeuchi A, Inoue A. Classification of bulk metallic glasses by atomic size difference, heat of mixing and period of constituent elements and its application to characterization of the main alloying element [J]. Mater. Trans., 2005, 46: 2817
[29] Li Z T, Chai F, Yang L, et al. Mechanical properties and nanoparticles precipitation behavior of multi-component ultra high strength steel [J]. Mater. Des., 2020, 191: 108637
[30] Kong H J, Xu C, Bu C C, et al. Hardening mechanisms and impact toughening of a high-strength steel containing low Ni and Cu additions [J]. Acta Mater., 2019, 172: 150
[31] Jiang S H, Wang H, Wu Y, et al. Ultrastrong steel via minimal lattice misfit and high-density nanoprecipitation [J]. Nature, 2017, 544: 460
[32] Wang D, Gao N, Gao F, et al. Cu segregation at Σ5 symmetrical grain boundary in α-Fe: Atomic-level simulations [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2014, 31: 096801
[33] Yuasa M, Mabuchi M. Effects of segregated Cu on an Fe grain boundary by first-principles tensile tests [J]. J. Phys. Condens. Matter., 2010, 22: 505705
[34] Thompson S W. Interrelationships between yield strength, low-temperature impact toughness, and microstructure in low-carbon, copper-precipitation-strengthened, high-strength low-alloy plate steels [J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2018, A711: 424
[35] Lejécek P. Grain Boundary Segregation in Metals [M]. New York: Springer, 2010: 177
[36] Naylor J P, Blondeau R. The respective roles of the packet size and the lath width on toughness [J]. Metall. Mater. Trans., 1976, 7A: 891
[37] Yong Q L. Second Phases in Structural Steels [M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2006: 22
[37] (雍岐龙. 钢铁结构材料中的第二相 [M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2006: 22)
文章导航

/