论文

AZ91D镁合金在激光选区熔化成形中的元素烧损*

  • 魏恺文 ,
  • 王泽敏 ,
  • 曾晓雁
展开
  • 1 华中科技大学光学与电子信息学院, 武汉 430074
    2 华中科技大学武汉光电国家实验室, 武汉 430074

收稿日期: 2015-04-13

  网络出版日期: 2016-02-25

基金资助

* 国家自然科学基金项目51075164, 国家高技术研究发展计划项目2013AA031606, 以及中央高校基本科研业务费项目HUST-2014QT006资助

ELEMENT LOSS OF AZ91D MAGNESIUM ALLOY DURING SELECTIVE LASER MELTING PROCESS

  • Kaiwen WEI ,
  • Zemin WANG ,
  • Xiaoyan ZENG
Expand
  • 1 School of Optical and Electronic Information, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    2 Wuhan National Laboratory of Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Received date: 2015-04-13

  Online published: 2016-02-25

Supported by

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51075164), High Technology Research and Development Program of China (No.2013AA031606) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (NoHUST-2014QT006)

摘要

利用OM, SEM, EDS, XRF和XRD等方法研究了AZ91D镁合金在激光选区熔化中的元素烧损机制以及烧损对成形试样化学成分、显微组织及力学性能的影响. 结果表明, 成形试样中Mg的相对含量(86.61%~88.68%)低于粉末原料中Mg的相对含量(90.63%), 而其Al的相对含量(10.40%~12.56%)则高于后者(8.97%). 该结果与基于Langmuir模型的计算结果相符, 表明在激光作用下主要是Mg发生了烧损. 成形试样的Mg与Al质量比η随激光体能量密度EV的增加呈现先上升后下降并最终趋于稳定的演变规律. 采用55.6 J/mm3EV所成形试样(试样No.8)的η值最接近粉末原料. 使用回归分析法建立了ηEV的解析关系, 其拟合度指标系数R2为0.858. 成分变化最为显著之一的成形试样No.1 (采用166.7 J/mm3EV所成形)与压铸态AZ91D 的组织特征相似, 均为β-Mg17Al12相呈网状分布于α-Mg基体间的典型凝固组织. 但成形试样No.1的β-Mg17Al12相含量及其α-Mg基体中Al的固溶量明显高于压铸态AZ91D. 成分变化导致成形试样No.1的拉伸强度及显微硬度得到提升, 但使其延伸率有所下降.

本文引用格式

魏恺文 , 王泽敏 , 曾晓雁 . AZ91D镁合金在激光选区熔化成形中的元素烧损*[J]. 金属学报, 2016 , 52(2) : 184 -190 . DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2015.00212

Abstract

Magnesium alloys have attracted more attentions due to their low densities and excellent specific strengths. However, proper manufacturing methods are still needed to promote further applications of magnesium alloys due to the shortcomings of conventional processing methods. As one of the most promising additive manufacturing technologies, selective laser melting (SLM) was utilized to process the most commonly-used AZ91D magnesium alloy in this work. Element vaporization mechanism during the forming process and the influence of element vaporization on chemical composition, microstructure, and mechanical properties of the final products were investigated using OM, SEM, EDS, XRF and XRD. The results show that the relative content of Mg in the SLM-processed samples (86.61%~88.68%) was lower than that in the original AZ91D powders (90.63%) , whereas the relative content of Al in the former ones (10.40%~12.56%) was higher than its counterpart in the latter ones (8.97%). This variation matches well with the calculation by Langmuir model, demonstrating that element vaporization of AZ91D mainly targets at Mg. With the increase of laser energy density (EV), weight ratio of Mg to Al (η) in the SLM-processed samples first increased, then decreased and finally tended to be constant. η of the sample prepared at 55.6 J/mm3 (sample No.8) presented a smallest difference with that of the original powders. A model illustrating analytic relationship between η and EV was established by mathematical regression with the fitting index R2 being 0.858. The sample processed at 166.7 J/mm3 (sample No.1) underwent one of the most remarkable compositional variation and exhibited a typical solidified microstructure similar to the die-cast AZ91D in which net-like β-Mg17Al12 precipitates were distributed around the α-Mg matrix. However, β-Mg17Al12 content as well as solid solubility of Al in α-Mg matrix was much higher in sample No.1. The enhanced tensile strength and micro-hardness as well as the deteriorated elongation of sample No.1 could be attributed to the composition variation during SLM process.

参考文献

[1] Mordike B L, Ebert T.Mater Sci Eng, 2001; A302: 37
[2] Wang Y X, Fu J W, Wang J, Luo T J, Dong X G, Yang Y S.Acta Metall Sin, 2011; 47: 410
[2] (王亚霄, 付俊伟, 王晶, 罗天骄, 董旭光, 杨院生. 金属学报, 2011; 47: 410)
[3] Frank W.Acta Biomater, 2010; 6: 1680
[4] Zhen R, Sun Y S, Bai J, Sun J J, Pi J H.Acta Metall Sin, 2012; 48: 733
[4] (甄睿, 孙扬善, 白晶, 孙晶晶, 皮锦红. 金属学报, 2012; 48: 733)
[5] Kulekci M K.Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2008; 39: 851
[6] Blawert C, Hort N, Kainer K U.Trans Indian Inst Met, 2004; 57: 397
[7] Zheng Y F, Gu X N, Li N, Zhou W R.Mater Chin, 2011; 30(4): 30
[7] (郑玉峰, 顾雪楠, 李楠, 周维瑞. 中国材料进展, 2011; 30(4): 30)
[8] Rashid R A R, Sun S J, Wang G, Dargusch M S.Int J Pr Eng Man, 2013; 14: 1263
[9] Zhang X H, Jiang J F, Luo S J.Chin J Nonferrous Met, 2009; 19: 1720
[9] (张晓华, 姜巨福, 罗守靖. 中国有色金属学报, 2009; 19: 1720)
[10] Zhang J L, Feng Z Y, Hu L Q, Wang S B, Xu B S.Acta Metall Sin, 2012; 48: 607
[10] (张金玲, 冯芝勇, 胡兰青, 王社斌, 许并社. 金属学报, 2012; 48: 607)
[11] Li Q, Li Z F, Li Y F, Luo S J, Gao X R.Foundry, 2008; 57: 895
[11] (李强, 李周复, 李远发, 罗守靖, 高小荣. 铸造, 2008; 57: 895)
[12] Wu L, Zhu H T, Gai X Y, Wang Y Y.J Prosthet Dent, 2014; 111: 51
[13] Ma M M, Wang Z M, Gao M, Zeng X Y.J Mater Process Technol, 2015; 215: 142
[14] Gu D D, Hagedorn Y C, Meiners W, Meng G B, Batista R J S, Wissenbach K, Poprawe R.Acta Mater, 2012; 60: 3849
[15] Gu D D, Shen Y F, Lu Z J.Mater Lett, 2009; 63: 1577
[16] Liu S H, Liu J L, Liu H, Duan Y W, Quan W W.Laser Technol, 2010; 34: 459
[16] (刘顺洪, 柳家良, 刘辉, 段元威, 权雯雯. 激光技术, 2010; 34: 459)
[17] Kolodziejczak P, Kalita W.J Mater Process Technol, 2009; 209: 1122
[18] Guan K, Wang Z M, Gao M, Li X Y, Zeng X Y.Mater Des, 2013; 50: 581
[19] Wang Z M, Guan K, Gao M, Li X Y, Chen X F, Zeng X Y.J Alloys Compd, 2012; 513: 518
[20] Block-Bolten A, Eagar T W.Metall Mater Trans, 1984; 15B: 461
[21] Khan P A A, Debroy T.Metall Mater Trans, 1984; 15B: 641
[22] Gale W F, Totemeier T C.Smithells Metals Reference Book. 8th Ed., Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2004: 8
[23] Abderrazak K, Bannour S, Mhiri H, Lepalec G, Autric M.Comp Mater Sci, 2009; 44: 858
[24] Yadroitsev I, Yadroitsava I, Bertrand P, Smurov I.Rapid Prototyping J, 2012; 18: 201
[25] Kouadri A, Barrallier L.Mater Sci Eng, 2006; A429: 11
[26] Min D, Shen J, Lai S Q, Chen J, Xu N, Liu H.Opt Laser Eng, 2011; 49: 89
[27] Dargusch M S, Pettersen K, Nogita K, Nave M D, Dunlop G L.Mater Trans, 2006; 47: 977
[28] Dahle A K, Lee Y C, Nave M D, Schaffer P L, StJohn D H.J Light Met, 2001; 1: 61
[29] Wahba M, Mizutani M, Kawahito Y, Katayama S.Mater Des, 2012; 33: 569
[30] Niknejad S T, Liu L, Nguyen T, Lee M Y, Esmaeili S, Zhou N Y.Metall Mater Trans, 2013; 44A: 3747
[31] Wang Z M, Gao M, Tang H G, Zeng X Y.Mater Charact, 2011; 62: 943
[32] Liu L M.Welding and Joining of Magnesium Alloys. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2010: 51
[33] Zhang G J, Long S Y, Cao F H.Spec Cast Nonferrous Alloys, 2009; 29: 848
[33] (张广俊, 龙思远, 曹凤红. 特种铸造及有色合金, 2009; 29: 848)
文章导航

/