钢包浇注末期汇流旋涡形成机理及影响因素*
收稿日期: 2015-07-16
网络出版日期: 2016-02-24
基金资助
* 国家自然科学基金项目51374021, 中央高校基本科研业务费项目06102110, 以及钢铁冶金新技术国家重点实验室自主研发基金项目41603014资助
FORMATION MECHANISM AND INFLUENCE FACTORS OF SINK VORTEX DURINGLADLE TEEMING
Received date: 2015-07-16
Online published: 2016-02-24
Supported by
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51374021), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.06102110) and Research and Development Funds of State Key Laboratory of Advanced Metallurgy (No.41603014)
采用数值模拟并结合实验的方法, 研究了Coriolis力、出水口位置、流体初始切向速度等因素对汇流旋涡产生过程的影响, 此外还研究了具有一定切向运动的流体在浇注过程中切向速度、径向速度的变化规律. 研究表明, 初始流体静止时, Coriolis力是汇流旋涡产生的主要原因, 且汇流旋涡产生的原始驱动力来自于出水口附近处的流体旋量; 初始流体静止时出水口位置对旋涡临界高度的影响不明显, 但是当流体具有一定的初始速度时出水口偏离中心可以使旋涡的产生高度显著降低, 此时流体的切向运动是汇流旋涡产生的根本原因; 流体初始切向运动速度对汇流旋涡的临界高度影响显著, 初始角速度越大, 汇流旋涡产生时刻越早, 临界高度也越高, 因此给予流体一定的静置时间、降低其湍流程度是抑制汇流旋涡卷渣的重要举措; 汇流旋涡的起旋高度HSS与初始角速度ω的关系式为HSS=0.11+2.85ω-4.04ω2+1.95ω3, 空气柱贯通至出水口的高度HCS与ω的关系式为HCS=0.09+1.49ω-0.79ω2, 拟合度均在0.99以上.
唐海燕 , 梁永昌 . 钢包浇注末期汇流旋涡形成机理及影响因素*[J]. 金属学报, 2016 , 52(5) : 519 -528 . DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2015.00391
To investigate the formation mechanism of sink vortex during ladle teeming, the effects of some factors such as Coriolis force, the position of the ladle shroud and initial tangential velocity of the fluid on the vortex formation process have been studied using numerical simulation combined with experiments. In addition, the evolution tendencies of tangential and radial velocities of the fluid over radial position were studied at certain initial tangential velocity. The results show that as for fully settled fluid, Coriolis force is the major reason for sink vortex formation and the spinor near the shroud is the initial driving force. There is no obvious effect of the ladle shroud position on the critical height of vortex for fully settled fluid, while the critical height of vortex significantly decreases with increasing shroud eccentricity for the fluid with a certain initial velocity, and the tangential motion is the main driving force for vortex formation in this case. The initial tangential velocity affects the critical height significantly. The larger the initial angular velocity is, the earlier vortex occurs and the bigger the critical height of vortex is. As a result, keeping the fluid settled for some time is an effective measure to delay vortex during ladle teeming. The relationship between the start height of vortex (HSS) and initial angular velocity (ω) can be expressed as HSS=0.11+2.85ω-4.04ω2+1.95ω3, and that of the height of air column extending to shroud (HCS) and ω expressed as HCS=0.09+1.49ω-0.79ω2, both of the fitting degrees are higher than 0.99.
| [1] | Huang Y, Ye S F, Tao Y P, Li M M, Huang Z M.J Iron Steel Res, 1995; 7(6): 9 |
| [1] | (黄晔, 叶树峰, 陶玉平, 李美明, 黄泽民. 钢铁研究学报, 1995; 7(6) : 9) |
| [2] | Lin R, Yan Z G, Yu J K. J Northeastern Univ (Nat Sci), 2010; 31: 1287 |
| [2] | (蔺瑞, 颜正国, 于景坤. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2010; 31: 1287) |
| [3] | Zhou L, Cao C H, Dai W, He X.Steelmaking, 2012; 28(2): 56 |
| [3] | (周俐, 曹成虎, 戴维, 何西. 炼钢, 2012; 28(2) : 56) |
| [4] | Lin R, Yan Z G, Liu T, Liu J Z, Yu J K.J Mater Metall, 2011; 10: 172 |
| [4] | (蔺瑞, 颜正国, 刘涛, 刘家占, 于景坤. 材料与冶金学报, 2011; 10: 172) |
| [5] | Mazzaferro G M, Piva M, Ferro S P, Bissio P, Iglesias M, Calvo A, Goldschmit M B.Ironmaking Steelmaking, 2004; 31: 1 |
| [6] | Lin R, Yan Z G, Liu T, Yu J K.Chin J Process Eng, 2010; 10: 655 |
| [6] | (蔺瑞, 颜正国, 刘涛, 于景坤. 过程工程学报, 2010; 10: 655) |
| [7] | Huang Y, Ye S F, Su T S, Li M M.Jiangxi Metall, 1999; 19(6) : 1 |
| [7] | (黄晔, 叶树峰, 苏天森, 李美明. 江西冶金, 1999; 19(6) : 1) |
| [8] | Davila O, Morales R D, Garcia D L.Metall Mater Trans, 2006; 37B: 71 |
| [9] | Jun W S, Joonpyo P, Hoyoung K, Zin H L.ISIJ Int, 2001; 41: 689 |
| [10] | Sankaranarayanan R, Grthrie R I L.Ironmaking Steelmaking, 2002; 29: 147 |
| [11] | Kojola N, Takagi S, Yokoya S, Jonsson P.ISIJ Int, 2009; 49: 1 |
| [12] | Rodolfo D M, Omar D M, Ismael C, Ken M H.ISIJ Int, 2013; 53: 782 |
| [13] | Wang J, Zhou S X, Chen W Z, Zhang S L.Foundry Technol, 2012; 33: 1194 |
| [13] | (王建, 周少雄, 陈文智, 张淑兰. 铸造技术, 2012; 33: 1194) |
| [14] | Koria S C, Kanth U.Steel Res, 1994; 5: 1 |
| [15] | Sucker D, Reinecke J.In Ironmaking Conference eds., Proc 5th Int Iron and Steel Congress, Washington: Iron and Steel Society of the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers (AIME), 1986: 331 |
| [16] | Piva M, Iglesias M, Bissio P, Calvo A.Physica, 2003; 329A: 1 |
| [17] | Kuwana K, Hassan M I, Singh P K, Saito K, Nakagawa J.Mater Manuf Processes, 2008; 23: 407 |
| [18] | Shi X G. J Hydrodyn, 1992; 7(1)A: 103 |
| [18] | (是勋刚. 水动力学研究与进展, 1992; 7(1)A: 103) |
| [19] | Zhang J S, Yang S F, Li J S, Yang W L, Wang Y, Guo X C.ISIJ Int, 2015; 55: 1684 |
| [20] | Shih T H, Liou W W, Shabbir A, Yang Z, Zhu J.Comput Fluids, 1995; 24: 227 |
| [21] | Tang H Y, Li J S, Ding X M, Tang W D.J Univ Sci Technol Beijing, 2011; 33(suppl.1): 34 |
| [21] | (唐海燕, 李京社, 丁小明, 唐文聃, 北京科技大学学报, 2011; 33(增刊1): 34) |
| [22] | Sucker D, Reinecke J, Hage Jewainski H.Stahl Eisen, 1985; 150: 765 |
| [23] | Tang H Y, Zhang T B, Li J S, Chen Y F. Mater Processing Fundamentals.Warrendale, Pennsylvania: Miner Met Mater Soc, 2013: 281 |
| [24] | Li G Y.Hydrau Technol, 2007; 38: 1409 |
| [24] | (李国英. 水力学报, 2007; 38: 1409) |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
