保护气对1000 MPa级熔敷金属组织及力学性能的影响*

  • 安同邦 ,
  • 田志凌 ,
  • 单际国 ,
  • 魏金山
展开
  • 1 清华大学机械工程系, 北京 100084
    2 钢铁研究总院, 北京 100081

网络出版日期: 2015-09-07

EFFECT OF SHIELDING GAS ON MICROSTRUCTURE AND PERFORMANCE OF 1000 MPa GRADE DEPOSITED METALS

  • Tongbang AN ,
  • Zhiling TIAN ,
  • Jiguo SHAN ,
  • Jinshan WEI
Expand
  • 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084
    2 Central Iron & Steel Research Institute, Beijing 100081

Online published: 2015-09-07

摘要

研究了不同保护气(Ar+5%CO2, Ar+10%CO2, Ar+20%CO2和Ar+30%CO2)对1000 MPa级高强熔敷金属组织及强韧性的影响. 结果表明, 当CO2含量为20%时, 熔敷金属力学强韧性最佳, 屈服强度为980 MPa, 室温冲击功为72.6 J, -40 ℃冲击功为52 J. 组织观察和分析结果表明, 随着保护气中CO2含量增加, 熔敷金属组织中贝氏体板条含量增多, 且贝氏体板条分布形态由平行状向交织状转变, 交织状贝氏体板条分割细化原奥氏体晶粒, 从而细化马氏体板条. 贝氏体含量和马氏体/贝氏体板条的分布形态是决定熔敷金属力学性能的根本原因. 贝氏体含量并非越多越好, 存在最佳含量比例; 随着保护气CO2含量的进一步增加, 熔敷金属夹杂物数量增加, 尺寸增大, 且主要成分含量发生变化. 当保护气中CO2含量为30%时, 出现较大尺寸的夹杂物, 导致熔敷金属韧性降低.

本文引用格式

安同邦 , 田志凌 , 单际国 , 魏金山 . 保护气对1000 MPa级熔敷金属组织及力学性能的影响*[J]. 金属学报, 2015 , 51(12) : 1489 -1499 . DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2015.00294

Abstract

The use of high strength low alloy steels provides several potential advantages including lower weight, lower manufacturing costs, and ease of handling and transport. The progress in steel manufacturing technology has continually called for new developments in welding processes and consumables to produce weld metal deposits with mechanical properties essentially equivalent to the base metal. Controlling the weld metal microstructures as well as raising the welding productivity is critical factor for the development of weld metal of high strength steel to secure satisfactory mechanical properties and to reduce production costs. In order to meet the demand to apply 1000 MPa class steel to the fabrication of large scale steel structures, a weld wire for the 1000 MPa class steel has been under development to obtain the required strength and toughness, which depend primarily on the microstructure. In this work, the effects of shielding gas composition on the microstructure and properties of 1000 MPa grade deposited metals produced by metal active gas (MAG) welding have been investigated. The shielding gas employed was a mixture of argon (Ar) and carbon dioxide (CO2) (5%~30%), and the weld heat input was 13 kJ/cm. The properties of deposited metal with shielding gas of 80%Ar+20%CO2 is the best, the yield strength is 980 MPa, meanwhile, its Charpy absorbed energy at room temperature and -40 ℃ are 72.6 and 52 J, respectively. The results show that the microstructure of the deposited metal, consisting primary of low carbon martensite and a few parallel bainite plate, became more interweaved bainitic packets as the CO2 content of the shielding gas was increased. The initial bainite nucleated at austenite grain boundaries and subsequent bainite plates can form at the oxide inclusions of intragranular, which presented an intersected configuration and the microstructure was refined. The content of bainite palte and distribution morphology of martensite/bainite is the intrinsic reason attributed to mechanical properties of deposited metals. The content of bainite for deposited metal has an optimal proportion and more isn't necessarily better. It was also found that the area fraction, the size and the compositions of oxide inclusions in deposited metals were changed with increasing CO2 content. The deposited metal as using 70%Ar+30%CO2 has the minimum toughness because more large size oxide inclusions formed which are known to be harmful to the toughness.

参考文献

[1] Liu S, Olson D L. Weld J, 1986; 65(6): S139
[2] Seo J S, Lee C H, Kim H J. ISIJ Int, 2013; 53: 279
[3] Yu S F, Qian B N, Guo X M. Acta Metall Sin, 2005; 41: 1082
[3] (于少飞, 钱百年, 国旭明. 金属学报, 2005; 41: 1082)
[4] Powell G L F, Herfurth G. Metall Mater Trans, 1998; 29A: 2775
[5] Utterberg B, Svensson L E. Sci Technol Weld Join, 2002; 7: 363
[6] de Rissone N M R, Bott I D, de Vedia L A, Surian E S. Sci Technol Weld Join, 2003; 8: 113
[7] Terashima T, Tsuboi J. Proc Natl Meet JWS'78, Tokyo: Japan Welding Society, 1978: 28
[8] Terashima H, Tsuboi J. Met Constr, 1982; 14: 648
[9] Terashima H, Hart P H M. Weld J, 1984; 63(6): S173
[10] Terashima S, Bhadeshia H K D H. Sci Technol Weld Join, 2006; 11: 509
[11] Gouda M, Takahashi M, Ikeuchi K. Sci Technol Weld Join, 2005; 10: 369
[12] Sato Y, Hayakawa N, Kuwana. Q J Jpn Weld Soc, 1992; 10: 422
[13] Prokic-Cvetkovic R, Milosavljevic A, Sedmak A, Popovic O. J Serb Chem Soc, 2006; 71: 313
[14] Peng Y, Wang A H, Xiao H J, Tian Z L. Acta Metall Sin, 2012; 48: 1281
[14] (彭 云, 王爱华, 肖红军, 田志凌. 金属学报, 2012; 48: 1281)
[15] Lepera F S. J Met, 1980; 32(3): 38
[16] Girault E, Jacques P, Harlet P, Mols K, Humbeeck J V, Aeenoudt E, Delannay F. Mater Charact, 1998; 40: 111
[17] Luo Z J, Wang L P, Wang M, Shen J C, Su H. Trans Mater Heat Treat, 2012; 33(2): 85
[17] (罗志俊, 王丽萍, 王 猛, 沈俊昶, 苏 航. 材料热处理学报, 2012; 33(2): 85)
[18] Peng Y, Peng X N, Zhang X M, Tian Z L, Wang T. J Iron Steel Res Int, 2014; 21: 539
[19] Gadallah R, Fahmy R, Khalifa T, Sadek A. Int J Eng Technol Innov, 2012; 2(1): 1
[20] Yang C L,Lin S B. Fundamentals of Arc Welding. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology Press, 2003: 1
[20] (杨春利,林三宝. 电弧焊基础. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学出版社, 2003: 1)
[21] Zhang J C, Wang G R, Shi Y H, Zhong J G. Weld Pipe Tube, 2006; 29(3): 46
[21] (张建春, 王国荣, 石永华, 钟继光. 焊管, 2006; 29(3): 46)
[22] Steven W, Haynes A G. J Iron Steel Inst, 1956; 183: 349
[23] Okazaki Y, Ishida H, Suenaga K, Hidaka T. Weld J, 2012; 26: 593
[24] Huang W G, Xu R, Fang H S, Zheng Y K. J Iron Steel Res, 1997; 9(2): 3
[24] (黄维刚, 徐 蓉, 方鸿生, 郑燕康. 钢铁研究学报, 1997; 9(2): 3)
[25] Song Y J, Lu J T, Liu J H, Shen L, Rao Q C, Zhou H J. Trans Mater Heat Treat, 1982; 3(1): 11
[25] (宋余九, 卢锦堂, 刘静华, 沈 莲, 饶启昌, 周惠久. 材料热处理学报, 1982; 3(1): 11)
[26] Yang Z G. Heat Treat Met, 2005; 30(1): 20
[26] (杨志刚. 金属热处理, 2005; 30(1): 20)
[27] Madariaga I, Gutierrez I. Acta Mater, 1999; 47: 951
[28] Ma H, Chen J H, Zhu L. J Lanzhou Univ Technol, 1993; 19(2): 1
[28] (马 杭, 陈剑虹, 朱 亮. 兰州理工大学学报, 1993; 19(2): 1)
[29] Wu B Z, Xu Y J, An H L, Sun J T. Trans China Weld Inst, 2014; 35(4): 53
[29] (吴炳智, 徐玉君, 安洪亮, 孙静涛. 焊接学报, 2014; 35(4): 53)
文章导航

/