不同热加工工艺对Al-Mg-Si-Cu合金板材力学性能和组织的影响*
网络出版日期: 2015-08-13
基金资助
* 国家高技术研究发展计划项目2013AA032403, 国家自然科学基金项目51571023 和51301016, 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目FRF-TP-14-097A2 和FRF-TP-15-051A3, 以及现代交通金属材料与加工技术北京实验室项目FRF-SD-B-005B资助
INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT THERMOMECHANICAL PROCESSES ON THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES AND MICROSTRUCTURE OF Al-Mg-Si-Cu ALLOY SHEETS
Online published: 2015-08-13
Supported by
Supported by National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (No.2013-AA032403), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.51571023 and 51301016), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Nos.FRFTP-14-097A2 and FRF-TP-15-051A3) and Beijing Laboratory of Metallic Materials and Processing for Modern Transportation (No. FRF-SD-B-005B)
通过拉伸实验, 并利用OM, SEM, TEM观察以及EBSD测试手段, 研究了不同热加工工艺对Al-Mg-Si-Cu系合金板材力学性能和组织, 包括织构的影响规律. 结果表明, 热加工工艺的变化对T4P预时效态合金的强度和应变硬化指数n基本无影响, 但是对平均塑性应变比
关键词: Al-Mg-Si-Cu合金; 热加工工艺; 成形性能; 再结晶织构; 模型
张艳 , 郭明星 , 邢辉 , 王斐 , 汪小锋 , 张济山 , 庄林忠 . 不同热加工工艺对Al-Mg-Si-Cu合金板材力学性能和组织的影响*[J]. 金属学报, 2015 , 51(12) : 1425 -1434 . DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2015.00063
To reduce the weight of car body, Al-Mg-Si-Cu alloys are becoming increasingly attractive as a candidate for material substitution used to produce the outer body panels of automobiles because of their favorable bake-hardening response. However, the formability still needs to be further improved compared to steels. In this work, the effect of the thermomechanical processing on the mechanical properties and microstructure of Al-Mg-Si-Cu alloy is studied through tensile test, OM, SEM and TEM observation, as well as EBSD characterization. The results reveal that there is almost no change in both strengths and strain-hardening exponent n of the sheets in T4P condition after different thermomechanical processing, but the average plasticity strain ratio
| [1] | Yu Z Q, Lin Z Q, Zhao Y X. Mater Des, 2007; 28: 203 |
| [2] | Gao Q M, Cao L S, Yu X D. Light Alloy Fabr Technol, 2009; 37: 30 |
| [2] | (高琪妹, 曹力生, 于晓丹. 轻合金加工技术, 2009; 37: 30) |
| [3] | Engler O, Hirsch J. Mater Sci Forum, 1996; 217: 479 |
| [4] | Bennett T A, Petrov R H, Kestens L A I. Scr Mater, 2010; 63: 461 |
| [5] | Troeger L P, Starke Jr E A. Mater Sci Eng, 2000; A293: 19 |
| [6] | Peng X Y, Guo M X, Wang X F, Cui L, Zhang J S, Zhuang L Z. Acta Metall Sin, 2015; 51: 169 |
| [6] | (彭祥阳, 郭明星, 汪小峰, 崔 莉, 张济山, 庄林忠. 金属学报, 2015; 51: 169) |
| [7] | Lievers W B, Pilkey A K, Lloyd D J. Mater Sci Eng, 2003; A361: 312 |
| [8] | Lankford W T, Snyder S C, Bauscher J A. Trans Am Soc Met, 1950; 42: 1197 |
| [9] | Hirofumi I, Takayuki T. Mater Trans, 2007; 48: 2014 |
| [10] | Leu D K. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 1997; 37: 201 |
| [11] | Humphreys F J. Acta Metall, 1977; 25: 1323 |
| [12] | Orsund R, Nes E. Scr Mater, 1988; 22: 665 |
| [13] | Davies R K, Randle V, Marshall G J. Acta Mater, 1998; 46: 6021 |
| [14] | Bennett T A, Petrov R H, Kestensv L A I. Scr Mater, 2010; 62: 78 |
| [15] | Higginson R L, Aindow M, Bate P S. Mater Sci Eng, 1997; A225: 9 |
| [16] | Ito K, Musick R, Lucke K. Acta Metall, 1983; 31: 2137 |
| [17] | Jensen D J, Hansen N, Humphreys E J. Acta Metall, 1985; 33: 2155 |
| [18] | Hansen N, Jensen D J. Metall Trans, 1986; 17A: 253 |
| [19] | Hirsch J, Nes E, Lucke K. Acta Metall, 1987; 35: 427 |
| [20] | Kashihara K, Inagaki H. Metall Trans, 2009; 50A: 528 |
| [21] | Humphreys F J. Acta Metall, 1977; 25: 1323 |
| [22] | Engler O. Mater Sci Technol, 1996; 12: 859 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |