感应回火对1000 MPa级高强度低合金钢碳化物析出行为及韧性的影响
房玉佩, 女, 1989年生, 硕士生
修回日期: 2014-06-17
网络出版日期: 2014-12-25
基金资助
*国家重点基础研究发展计划资助项目 2010CB630801
EFFECT OF INDUCTION TEMPERING ON CARBIDE PRECIPITATION BEHAVIOR AND TOUGHNESS OF A 1000 MPa GRADE HIGH STRENGTH LOW ALLOY STEEL
Revised date: 2014-06-17
Online published: 2014-12-25
Supported by
Supported by National Basic Research Program of China (No.2010CB630801)
对比研究了电磁感应及传统箱式炉2种不同回火加热方式对1000 MPa级别高强度低合金钢淬火后组织中碳化物的尺寸、形貌、分布及其对力学性能的影响. 结果表明, 实验钢淬火后组织包括下贝氏体及板条马氏体. 2种加热方式回火后, 对于下贝氏体组织, 随着回火温度由400 ℃升高至550 ℃, 碳化物由针状向短棒状转变. 其中, 经550 ℃传统加热回火后, 贝氏体内部碳化物长轴尺寸约为200 nm, 而经该温度电磁感应加热回火后其长轴尺寸约为60 nm. 对于板条马氏体组织, 经传统加热回火后, 碳化物主要沿着板条边界连串析出; 电磁感应加热回火后, 马氏体板条中析出的碳化物在板条内部及边界均匀弥散分布. 经550 ℃传统方式回火后, 马氏体中的碳化物尺寸约为200 nm, 而电磁感应回火的碳化物尺寸均小于100 nm. 经过不同加热方式回火后, 实验钢的硬度差别不显著, 随着回火温度升高, 2种加热方式回火试样冲击功均升高, 但感应加热回火后冲击功升高更为显著, 实验钢经550 ℃电磁感应加热回火后-20 ℃冲击功达到133 J, 是传统加热回火工艺的4.5倍, 实现了1000 MPa级高强度低合金钢良好的强韧化组合.
房玉佩 , 谢振家 , 尚成嘉 . 感应回火对1000 MPa级高强度低合金钢碳化物析出行为及韧性的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2014 , 50(12) : 1413 -1420 . DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2014.00306
By comparing induction tempering with conventional tempering, the effect of induction reheating tempering on carbide precipitation behavior and toughness of a 1000 MPa grade high strength low alloy steel was investigated. Microstructures of the steel in different heat treatment stages were characterized using SEM and TEM (with EDS), mechanical properties inclusive of Vickers hardness and toughness were tested. The results showed that microstructure of quenched samples consisted of lath martensite and lower bainite, needle like carbides were observed in lower bainitic lath. With tempering temperature increasing from 400 ℃ to 550 ℃, the shape of carbides located within the bainitic lath gradually changed from needle like to short rod like type. Carbides were fine and well distributed using induction tempering. When the tempering temperature was 550 ℃, the long axis length of short rod like carbides located within the bainitic lath by conventional reheating tempering was 200 nm, whereas the long axis length of short rod like carbides located within the bainitic lath by induction reheating tempering was about 60 nm. When tempering by conventional reheating, carbides mainly precipitated along martensite lath boundaries, while carbides were more dispersed in the matrix lath by induction reheating, the size of these dispersed carbides was less than 100 nm when tempering temperature was 550 ℃. As a result, a superior of mechanical properties with 344 HV and Charpy impact energy of 133 J at -20 ℃ was obtained with induction reheating tempering at 550 ℃.
| [1] | Akihide N, Takayuki I, Tadashi O. JFE Tech Rep, 2008; 6: 13 |
| [2] | Li X C, Xie Z J, Wang X L, Wang X M, Shang C J. Acta Metall Sin, 2013; 49: 167 |
| [2] | (李秀程, 谢振家, 王学林, 王学敏, 尚成嘉. 金属学报, 2013; 49: 167) |
| [3] | Barani A A, Li F, Romano P, Ponge D, Raabe D. Mater Sci Eng, 2007; A43: 138 |
| [4] | Hahn G T. Metall Trans, 1984; 15A: 947 |
| [5] | Furuhara T, Kobayashi K, Maki T. ISIJ Int, 2004; 44: 1937 |
| [6] | Xie Z J, Fang Y P, Han G, Guo H, Misra R D K, Shang C J. Mater Sci Eng, 2014; A618: 112 |
| [7] | Nam W J, Lee C S, Ban D Y. Mater Sci Eng, 2000; A289: 8 |
| [8] | Won J N, Dae S K, Soon T A. J Mater Sci Lett, 2003; 38: 3611 |
| [9] | Park J S, Lee Y K. Scr Mater, 2007; 57: 109 |
| [10] | Revilla C, Uranga P, Lopez B, Rodriguez-Ibabe J M. In: Bai D Q ed., Proc Materials Science and Technology Conference, Cleveland: Steel Product Metallurgy and Applications, 2012: 1069 |
| [11] | Lee J B, Kang N, Park J T, Ahn S T, Park Y D, Choi D, Kim K R, Cho K M. Mater Chem Phys, 2011; 129: 365 |
| [12] | Soon T A, Dae S K, Won J N. J Mater Process Technol, 2005; 160: 54 |
| [13] | Kawasaki K, Chiba T, Yamazaki T. Tetsu Hagané, 1988; 74: 334 |
| [13] | (川嵜一博, 千葉貴世, 山崎隆雄. 鉄と鋼, 1988; 74: 334) |
| [14] | Yusa S, Hara T, Tsuzaki K, Takahashi T. Mater Sci Eng, 1999; A273: 462 |
| [15] | Ahn S T, Cho K M, Lee S L, Kor J. Inst Met Mater, 2002; 40: 252 |
| [16] | Reviall C, López B, Rodriguez-Ibabe J M. Mater Des, 2014; 62: 296 |
| [17] | Yong Q L. Secondary Phases in Steel. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2006: 226 |
| [17] | (雍岐龙. 钢铁材料中的第二相. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2006: 226) |
| [18] | Yang S W, Shang C J, He X L. Int J Miner Met Mater, 2001; 8: 119 |
| [19] | Yong Q L, Chen M X, Pei H Z, Pan L, Zhou X L, Yang T W, Zhong W, Hao J Y. J Iron Steel Res, 2006; 18(3): 30 |
| [19] | (雍岐龙, 陈明昕, 裴和中, 潘 俐, 周晓玲, 杨天武, 钟 卫, 郝建英. 钢铁研究学报, 2006; 18(3): 30) |
| [20] | Xu Y B, Yu Y M, Wu D, Wang G D. Chin J Mater Res, 2006; 20: 104 |
| [20] | (许云波, 于永梅, 吴 迪, 王国栋. 材料研究学报, 2006; 20: 104) |
| [21] | Liu Q D, Chu Y L, Wang Z M, Liu W Q, Zhou B X. Acta Metall Sin, 2008; 44: 1281 |
| [21] | (刘庆冬, 褚于良, 王泽民, 刘文庆, 周邦新. 金属学报, 2008; 44:1281) |
| [22] | Liu Q D, Liu W Q, Wang Z M, Zhou B X. Acta Metall Sin, 2009; 45: 1281 |
| [22] | (刘庆冬, 刘文庆, 王泽民, 周邦新. 金属学报, 2009; 45: 1281) |
| [23] | Nam W J, Kim D S. J Mater Sci, 2003; 38: 3611 |
| [24] | Hayakawa M, Matsuoka S, Tsuzaki K, Hanada H, Sugisaki M. Scr Mater, 2002; 47: 655 |
| [25] | Bowen P, Druce S G, Knott J F. Acta Metall, 1987; 35: 1735 |
| [26] | Chen Z Z, Ma Y L, Xing S Q, Feng D C, Li H Q. J Inn Mong Univ Sci Technol, 2010; 29: 123 |
| [26] | (陈正宗, 麻永林, 邢淑清, 冯佃臣, 李慧琴. 内蒙古科技大学学报, 2010; 29: 123) |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |