应变速率对DP780钢动态拉伸变形行为的影响

董丹阳; 刘杨; 王磊; 苏亮进

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1037.2012.00515

金属学报 >

2013 , Vol. 49 >Issue 2: 159 - 166

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1037.2012.00515

论文

应变速率对DP780钢动态拉伸变形行为的影响

董丹阳 ,
刘杨 ,
王磊 ,
苏亮进

展开

1) 东北大学理学院, 沈阳 110819
2) 东北大学材料各向异性与织构教育部重点实验室, 沈阳 110819

董丹阳, 女, 1979年生, 讲师, 博士

收稿日期: 2012-09-04

修回日期: 2012-11-08

网络出版日期: 2013-02-11

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目51101029, 国家教育部博士点专项基金项目20110042120025, 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目

收起

EFFECT OF STRAIN RATE ON DYNAMIC DEFORMATION BEHAVIOR OF DP780 STEEL

DONG Danyang ,
LIU Yang ,
WANG Lei ,
SU Liangjin

Expand

1) College of Science, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819
2) Key Lab for Anisotropy and Texture of Materials, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819

Received date: 2012-09-04

Revised date: 2012-11-08

Online published: 2013-02-11

Fold

摘要

利用电液伺服高速试验机对DP780钢进行不同应变速率下的拉伸变形, 结合SEM和TEM等手段, 研究了应变速率对DP780钢拉伸性能及变形行为的影响规律及机制. 结果表明, 在较低应变速率(<10⁰ s^-1)条件下, 随应变速率增加, DP780钢的强度、塑性等力学性能均未见显著变化. 当应变速率超过10¹ s^-1后, DP780钢的强度和应变硬化指数n明显提高; 塑性在3~10¹-5~10² s^-1范围内出现大幅度增加的现象. 高应变速率的变形过程中, 铁素体基体中位错运动速度加快, 导致“近程阻力”增大, 使DP780钢的变形抗力随应变速率的增加而增大.在应变速率达到3~10¹ s^-1之后, 铁素体中可动位错数量的大幅度提高, 是DP780钢均匀伸长率和断后伸长率在3~10¹-5~10² s^-1范围内得以明显增加的主要原因. DP780钢中的铁素体/马氏体界面是塑性变形过程中位错塞积、微裂纹形核及扩展的主要位置, 而随应变速率的增加, 铁素体基体中的形变强化程度增大, 可降低铁素体基体与铁素体/马氏体界面之间塑性应变能差异, 延缓铁素体/马氏体界面处微裂纹的形成和扩展, 一定程度上提高了DP780钢非均匀塑性变形能力.

关键词： 双相钢; 动态载荷; 应变速率; 变形行为

本文引用格式

董丹阳 , 刘杨 , 王磊 , 苏亮进 . 应变速率对DP780钢动态拉伸变形行为的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2013 , 49(2) : 159 -166 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2012.00515

Abstract

Tensile properties and deformation behavior of DP780 steel were studied using servo-hydraulic high-speed material testing machine, SEM and TEM. The effects of strain rate and the mechanism were investigated. The results showed that the strength and ductility of DP780 steel remained almost unchanged as the strain rate increased at strain rates lower than 10⁰ s^-1. When the strain rate was over 10¹ s^-1, the strength and the strain-hardening coefficient increased remarkably. Ductility of DP780 steel increased significantly at the strain rates ranging from 3~10¹ to 5~10² s^-1. The deformation resistance increased with increasing the strain rate due to the stronger short range resistance induced by the acceleration of dislocation motion in the ferrite matrix. Increasing strain rate up to 3~10¹ s^-1 resulted in a considerable increase of the amount of mobile dislocation, which was the main reason for the increasing uniform elongation and fracture elongation of DP780 steel at the strain rate ranging from 3~10¹ to 5~10² s^-1. Interface of ferrite-martensite in DP780 steel was the main location for pile-up of dislocation, crack initiation and propagation. The ability of inhomogeneous plastic deformation of DP780 steel increased due to the decreasing plastic strain energy difference between the ferrite matrix and ferrite-martensite interface and the consequent delaying initiation and propagation of microvoids at ferrite-martensite interface induced by the increasing work hardening degree of ferrite matrix with the increasing strain rate.

Key words： dual phase steel; dynamic load; strain rate; deformation behavior

参考文献

[1] Curtze S, Kuokkala V T, Hokka M, Peura P. Mater Sci Eng, 2009; A507: 124

[2] Huh H, Lim J H, Park S H. Int J Auto Tech-Kor, 2009; 10(2): 195

[3] Khan A S, Baig M, Choi S H, Yang H S, Sun X. Int J Plast, 2012; 30-31: 1

[4] Ma M T, Yi H L, Lu H Z, Wan X M. Eng Sci, 2009; 11(9): 20

(马鸣图, 易红亮, 路洪洲, 万鑫铭. 中国工程科学, 2009; 11(9): 20)

[5] Maggi S, Murgia M. Weld Int, 2008; 22: 610

[6] Reisgen U, Schleser M, Mokrov O, Ahmed E. J Mater Process Technol, 2010; 210: 2188

[7] Yu H D, Guo Y J, Lai X M. Mater Des, 2009; 30: 2501

[8] Wang H Y, Chen J Y. Lightweight Structure of Autobody and Lightweight Material.

Beijing: Peking University Press, 2009: 20

(王宏雁, 陈军毅. 汽车车身轻量化结构与轻质材料. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2009: 20)

[9] Singh N K, Cadoni E, Singha M K, Gupta N K. Mater Des, 2011; 32: 5091

[10] Wei X C, Fu R Y, Li L. Mater Sci Eng, 2007; A465: 260

[11] Oliver S, Jones T B, Fourlaris G. Mater Charact, 2007; 58: 390

[12] Boyce B L, Dilmore M F. Int J Impact Eng, 2009; 36: 263

[13] Huh H, Kim S B, Song J H, Lim J H. Int J Mech Sci, 2008; 50: 918

[14] Smerd R, Winkler S, Salisbury C, Worswick M, Lloyd D, Finn M. Int J Impact Eng, 2005; 32: 541

[15] Ishikawa K, Watanabe H, Mukai T. Mater Lett, 2005; 59: 1511

[16] Odeshi A G, Al-ameeri S, Bassim M N. J Mater Process Technol, 2005; 162-163: 385

[17] Gong X, Fan J L, Huang B Y, Tian J M. Mater Sci Eng, 2010; A527: 7565

[18] Ludwik P. Physics, 1909; 10Z: 411

[19] Hollomon J H. Trans ASM, 1944; 32: 123

[20] Plumbridge W J. J Mater Sci, 1996; 31: 2501

[21] Castany P, Pettinari-Sturmel F, Crestou J, Douin J, Coujou A. Acta Mater, 2007; 55: 6284

[22] Walgraef D. Mater Sci Eng, 2010; A322: 167

[23] Johnston W G, Gilman J J. J Appl Phys, 1959; 30: 129

[24] Meyers M A, translated by Zhang Q M, Liu Y, Huang F L, Lu Z J.

Dynamic Behavior of Materials. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2006: 225

(Meyers M A著, 张庆明, 刘彦, 黄风雷, 吕中杰译. 材料的动力学行为. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2006: 225)

[25] Rajeev K, Sia N N. Metall Mater Trans, 2000; 31A: 815

[26] Liu Y, Wang L, He S S, Feng F, Lu X D, Zhang B J. Acta Metall Sin, 2012; 48: 49

(刘杨, 王磊, 何思斯, 冯飞, 吕旭东, 张北江. 金属学报, 2012; 48: 49)

[27] Liu J T, Wang Z G, Shang J K. Acta Metall Sin, 2008; 44: 1409

(刘江涛, 王中光, 尚建库. 金属学报, 2008; 44: 1409)

[28] Liu Z L, You X C, Zhuang Z. Int J Solids Struct, 2008; 45: 3674

[29] Livingston J D, Chalmers B. Acta Mater, 1957; 5: 322

[30] Rajeev K, Sia N N. Mech Mater, 1998; 27(1): 1

[31] Tang C G, Zhu J H, Zhou H J. Chin J Mater Res, 1996; 10: 19

(唐长国, 朱金华, 周惠久. 材料研究学报, 1996; 10: 19)

[32] Rusinek A, Klepaczko J R. Mater Des, 2009; 30(1): 35

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献