交变电场脉冲钝化Fe24Mn4Al5Cr反铁磁定膨胀合金及其耐蚀性研究
收稿日期: 2012-04-13
修回日期: 2012-08-20
网络出版日期: 2012-11-11
基金资助
国家自然科学基金资助项目50725519
AN ANTIFERROMAGNETIC Fe24Mn4Al5Cr COVAR ALLOY IMPULSE--PASSIVATED BY AN ALTERNATING CURRENT VOLTAGE OVERLAPPING A DIRECT CURRENT VOLTAGE AND ITS CORROSION RESISTANCE
Received date: 2012-04-13
Revised date: 2012-08-20
Online published: 2012-11-11
Supported by
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.50725519)
采用交变电场脉冲钝化技术表面改性Fe24Mn4Al5Cr反铁磁定膨胀合金. 在1.0 mol/L Na2SO4溶液中通过脉冲钝化生长钝化膜, 再在1.0 mol/L Na2SO4+0.5 mol/L Na2SO4溶液中测定电位衰减曲线, 以优化脉冲钝化工艺参数. 利用AES和XPS分析优化工艺条件下生长的脉冲钝化膜化学组成、键合状态及其深度分布; 利用阳极极化曲线和电化学阻抗谱测试脉冲钝化膜耐腐蚀性能, 并与直流 620 mV连续钝化15 min生长钝化膜相比较. 研究发现, 脉冲钝化膜中元素Al和Cr富集, 元素 Mn贫化, 具有保护性的Al2O3和Cr2O3氧化物阻碍层增厚. 脉冲钝化膜的阳极极化曲线呈自钝化, 自腐蚀电位Ecorr
由连续钝化膜的-360 mV增至-100 mV, 维钝电流密度emp由 2.6 μA/cm2降至0.7 μA/cm2, 阳极极化性能与AISI 304不锈钢相当. 脉冲钝化膜的EIS与连续钝化膜相比, 其容抗弧直径及|Z|值增加, 相位角平台变宽, 利用等效电路Rs-(Rp//CPE)拟合的脉冲钝化膜电阻Rp由连续钝化膜的14.8 kΩ·cm2增至54.0 kΩ·cm2, 计算的有效电容CB则由14.0 μF/cm2降至10.2 μF/cm2. Fe24Mn4Al5Cr反铁磁定膨胀合金脉冲钝化膜的绝缘性提高, 耐蚀性改善.
朱雪梅 曹雪梅 刘明 雷明凯 张彦生 . 交变电场脉冲钝化Fe24Mn4Al5Cr反铁磁定膨胀合金及其耐蚀性研究[J]. 金属学报, 2012 , 48(11) : 1357 -1364 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2012.00201
An antiferromagnetic Fe24Mn4Al5Cr covar alloy has been impulse-passivated by an alternating current (AC) voltage overlapping a direct current (DC) voltage, in order to improve its corrosion resistance due to the poor corrosion property of austenite matrix with a high Mn content, a low Cr and/or Al content. The impulse-passivated films were obtained in 1.0 mol/L Na2SO4 solution at an AC voltage with modulation amplitude of 180-480 mV during alternating period of 200-400 ms for modification time of 5-15 min, and simultaneously at a DC voltage of 620 mV. The impulse-passivation parameters in 1.0 mol/L Na2SO4 + 0.5 mol/L Ha2SO4 solution were optimized as amplitude of 380 mV, period of 300 ms, and time of 10 min, by using the potential decline curves. The impulse-passivated films on the covar alloy under the optimum parameters were characterized by Auger electron spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (AES/XPS), and evaluated by anodic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), respectively, and compared with those of the constant-passivated films at DC voltage of 620 mV for modification time of 15 min. In the impulse-passivated films on the covar alloy, an enrichment of elements Al and Cr, a lack of Mn in a thick barrier film composed of oxides Al2O3 and Cr2O3. The anodic polarization curves of the impulse-passivated films have a self-passivation with the higher corrosion potential of -100 mV and lower passive current density of 0.7 μA/cm2, than those of -360 mV and 2.6 μA/cm2 for the constant-passivated films. These electrochemical polarization behaviors were similar to those of the AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. The EIS of the impulse-passivated films has larger diameter of capacitive arc, higher impedance modulus $|Z|$, and wider phase degree range, relative to the constant-passivated films. Correspondently, the impulse-passivated film resistant Rp increased to 54.0 kΩ·cm2 from 14.8 kΩ·cm2 and effective capacitance decreased to 10.2 μF/cm2 from 14.0 μF/cm2, using an equivalent electric circuit of< Rs-(Rp//CPE). The high insulation of the impulse-passivated films on the covar alloy led to an improved corrosion resistance of the cover alloy. The impulse-passivated antiferromagnetic Fe24Mn4Al5Cr covar alloy exhibits an application potential in wide industrial field.
[1] Shi C X, Zhang Y S. Encycl Mater Sci Eng, 1993; 3(Suppl.): 1719
[2] Casteletti L C, Lombardi N A, Totten G E, Heck S C, Fernandes F A P. J ASTM Int, 2010; 7: 102605
[3] Zhu X M, Zhang Y S. Corrosion, 1998; 54: 3
[4] Umino R, Liu X J, Sutou Y, Wang C P, Ohnuma I, Kainuma R, Ishida K. J Phase Equilb Diffus, 2006; 27: 54
[5] Gebhardt T, Music D, Kossmann D, Ekholm M, Abrikosov I A, Vitos L, Schneider J M. Acta Mater, 2011; 59: 3145
[6] Lee J W, Duh J G, Wang J H. Surf Coat Technol, 2003; 168: 223
[7] Jaw J H, Cheng W C, Wang C J. Metall Mater Trans, 2005; 36A: 2289
[8] Su C W, Lee J W, Wang C S, Chao C G, Liu T F. Surf Coat Technol, 2008; 202: 1847
[9] Wang C H, Luo C W, Huang C F, Huang M S, Ou K L, Yu C H. J Alloys Compd, 2011; 509: 691
[10] Zhang Y S, Zhu X M, Liu M, Che R X. Appl Surf Sci, 2004; 222: 89
[11] Zhu X M, Liu M, Zhang Y S. Corros Eng Sci Technol, 2007; 42: 22
[12] Wendt J L, Chin D T. Corros Sci, 1985; 25: 889
[13] Wendt J L, Chin D T. Corros Sci, 1985; 25: 901
[14] Song G L, Cao C N, Wang Y, Lin H C. J Chin Soc Corros Protect, 1991; 11: 319
(宋光铃, 曹楚南, 王友, 林海潮. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 1991; 11: 319)
[15] Song G L, Cao C N, Lin H C, Xia B J. J Chin Soc Corros Protect, 1992; 12: 77
(宋光铃, 曹楚南, 林海潮, 夏邦杰. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 1992; 12: 77)
[16] Mansfeld F, Lin S H, Kwiatkowski L. Corrosion, 1994; 50: 838
[17] Zhang J X, Yan L C, Wei Z F, Qiao Y N, Cao C N, Zhang J Q. Acta Metall Sin, 2004; 40: 404
(张俊喜, 颜立成, 魏增福, 乔亦男, 曹楚南, 张鉴清. 金属学报, 2004; 40: 404)
[18] Taveira L V, Montemor M F, Belo M D C, Ferreira M G, Dick L F P. Corros Sci, 2010; 52: 2813
[19] Doff J, Archibong P E, Jones G, Koroleva E V, Skeldon P, Thompson G E. Electrochim Acta, 2011; 56: 3225
[20] Liu X L, Xu Y X, Zhang T, Shao Y W, Meng G Z, Wang F H. Corros Sci Prot Technol, 2009; 21: 188
(刘晓兰, 徐雅欣, 张 涛, 邵亚薇, 孟国哲, 王福会. 腐蚀科学与防护技术, 2009; 21: 188)
[21] Liu X L, Zhang T, Shao Y W, Meng G Z, Wang F H. Corros Sci, 2009; 51: 2685
[22] Sanz J M, Hofmann S. Surf Interface Anal, 1986; 8: 147
[23] Zhu X M, Zhang Y S. Appl Surf Sci, 1998; 125: 11
[24] Trompette J L, Massot L. Corros Sci, 2012; 57: 174
[25] Li Y C, Yan C W, Duan H P. J Chin Soc Corros Protect, 2002; 22: 375
(李运超, 严川伟, 段红平. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2002; 22: 375)
[26] Brug J, van den Eeden ALG, Sluyters–Rehbach M, Sluyters J H. J Electroanal Chem, 1984; 176: 275
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |