论文

异材焊接件A508/52M/316L在高温水环境中的应力腐蚀破裂

  • 李光福 ,
  • 李冠军 ,
  • 方可伟 ,
  • 彭君 ,
  • 杨武 ,
  • 张茂龙 ,
  • 孙志远
展开
  • 1) 上海材料研究所上海市工程材料应用评价重点实验室, 上海 200437
    2) 上海电气核电设备有限公司, 上海 201306
李光福, 男, 1962年生, 教授级高级工程师

收稿日期: 2011-05-19

  修回日期: 2011-06-03

  网络出版日期: 2011-07-11

基金资助

国家核电专项基金项目2011ZX06004-009, 国家重点基础研究发展计划项目2011CB610506和上海市科委项目09dz1100105资助

STRESS CORROSION CRACKING BEHAVIOR OF DISSIMILAR METAL WELD A508/52M/316L IN HIGH TEMPERATURE WATER ENVIRONMENT

  • LI Guang-Fu ,
  • LI Guan-Jun ,
  • FANG Ke-Wei ,
  • PENG Jun ,
  • YANG Wu ,
  • ZHANG Mao-Long ,
  • XUN Zhi-Yuan
Expand
  • 1) Shanghai Key Lab for Engineering Materials Evaluation, Shanghai Research Institute of Materials, Shanghai 200437
    2) Shanghai Electric Nuclear Power Equipment Co.,Ltd., Shanghai 201306

Received date: 2011-05-19

  Revised date: 2011-06-03

  Online published: 2011-07-11

Supported by

Supported by National Special Fund on Nuclear Power (No.2011ZX06004-009), National Basic Research  Program of China (No.2011CB610506) and Research Program of Shanghai Municipal Committee of Science and Technology (No.09dz1100105)

摘要

采用慢应变速率实验(SSRT)方法, 研究了先进的异材焊接件A508/52M/316L在模拟压水堆一回路290 ℃高温水环境中的应力腐蚀破裂(SCC)特性. 实验在-780 mV至+200 mV范围的电位下进行, 模拟一回路水化学从低O含H的理想低电位状态到溶解O$_{2}$明显超标的高电位状态的服役环境. 该焊接件显微组织和化学成分分布较复杂, 显著的变化发生在A508/52M和52M/316L 2个界面附近. 在SSRT拉伸试样的典型位置处加工了同样尺寸的尖锐缺口, 以模拟应力集中和加速实验, 并比较这些典型位置的SCC 敏感性. 结果表明, 当电位位于-780 mV至-300 mV范围时, SSRT试样总是以韧性断裂形式在镍基合金焊缝中部发生断裂. 当电位升到-200 mV至+200 mV范围时, 试样发生显著的SCC脆断, A508/52M界面区周围是该焊接件最脆弱的部位, 在该界面和附近的A508热影响区发生穿晶应力腐蚀破裂(TGSCC), 在紧邻界面的镍基合金焊缝薄层发生沿晶应力腐蚀破裂(IGSCC). 讨论了破裂机理和实验结果的工程意义.

本文引用格式

李光福 , 李冠军 , 方可伟 , 彭君 , 杨武 , 张茂龙 , 孙志远 . 异材焊接件A508/52M/316L在高温水环境中的应力腐蚀破裂[J]. 金属学报, 2011 , 47(7) : 797 -803 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2011.00316

Abstract

The stress corrosion cracking (SCC) behavior of advanced dissimilar metal weld A508/52M/316L in simulated primary water environments of pressurized water reactor (PWR) at 290 ℃ was investigated by means of slow strain rate testing (SSRT). The tests were performed at various applied electrode potentials which correspond to the electrochemical conditions of the weld in various water environments, from low potentials with ideal water chemistry to high potentials with oxygen-contaminated water chemistry. The weld exhibits complicated microstructure and chemical composition distributions, especially, significant changes appear around the A508/52M interface and the 52M/316L interface. For tensile specimens in SSRT, sharp notches were machined at important and typical places, i.e., at the two interfaces and in the bulk parts of the low alloy steel, Ni base weld metal and stainless steel of the weld. Results showed that the specimens always failed in bulk zone of the Ni base weld metal with ductile appearances when tested in the potential range from -780 mV to -300 mV (vs SHE). When electrode potential was raised into the range from -200 mV to +200 mV which corresponds to oxygen-contaminated water chemistry, the weld exhibits significant SCC. The area around the A508/52M interface is the weakest place, transgranular stress corrosion cracking (TGSCC) happened both along the interface and in A508 heat affected zone (HAZ), intergranular stress corrosion cracking (IGSCC) occurred in the Ni base weld metal close to the interface. The cracking mechanism and the engineering practical significance were discussed.

参考文献

[1] Lundin C D. Weld Res, 1982; 61(suppl): 58

[2] Karlsson L. Weld World, 1995; 36: 125

[3] Bamford W H, Foster J, Hsu K R, Tunon–Sanjur L, McIlree A. In: Ford F P, Was G S, Nelson J L, eds., Proc 10th Int Conf Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems-Water Reactors, USA: NACE International, 2002, CD–ROM

[4] Jenssen A, Norrgard K, Lagerstron J, Embring G, Tice D R. In: Ford F P, Was G S, Nelson J L, eds., Proc 10th Int Conf Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems-Water Reactors, USA: NACE International, 2002, CD–ROM

[5] Li G F, Yang W. Nucl Saf, 2003; (2): 37

(李光福, 杨武. 核安全, 2003; (2): 37)

[6] Andresen P, Morra M, Ahluwalia A, Hickling J, Wilson J. In: King P, Allen T, Busby J, eds., Proc 13th Int Conf Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems-Water Reactors, Canada: Canadian Nuclear Society, 2007, CD–ROM

[7] Shoji T, Lu Z, Yamazaki S. In: Allen T, Busby J, Iievbare G, eds., Proc 14th Int Conf Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems—Water Reactors, USA: American Nuclear Society, 2009, CD–ROM

[8] Alexandreanu B, Yang Y, Chen Y, Shack W. J. In: Allen T, Busby J, Iievbare G, eds., Proc 14th Int Conf Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems—Water Reactors, USA: American Nuclear Society, 2009, CD–ROM

[9] Scott P M. Corros Sci, 1985; 25: 583

[10] Roborg B, Molander A A. In: Roberts J T A, Weeks J R, Theus G J, eds., Proc 2nd Int Symp Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems—Water Reactors, USA: American Nuclear Society, 1985: 419

[11] Macdonald D D, Song H, Makela K, Yoshida K. Corrosion, 1993; 49: 8

[12] Li G F, Congleton J. Corros Sci, 2000; 42: 1005

[13] Li G F, Charles E A, Congleton J. Corros Sci, 2001; 43: 1963

[14] Yang W, Li G F, Huang C B, Zhou J J, Lu Z P. Chin J Mech Eng, 2010; 23: 677

[15] Ford P. Corrosion, 1996; 52: 375

[16] Andresen P L, Young L M. In: Gold R, McIlree A, eds., Proc 7th Int Symp Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems—Water Reactors, USA: NACE International, 1995: 579

[17] Peng Q J, Li G F, Shoji T. J Nucl Sci Technol, 2003; 40: 397
文章导航

/