热锻温度对TG6高温钛合金显微组织和力学性能的影响

王涛; 谭立军; 郭鸿镇; 姚泽坤; 张永强

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1037.2009.00851

金属学报 >

2010 , Vol. 46 >Issue 8: 913 - 920

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1037.2009.00851

论文

热锻温度对TG6高温钛合金显微组织和力学性能的影响

王涛 ,
谭立军 ,
郭鸿镇 ,
姚泽坤 ,
张永强

展开

西北工业大学材料科学与工程学院, 西安 710072

王涛, 男, 1982年生, 博士生

收稿日期: 2009-12-21

修回日期: 2010-05-06

网络出版日期: 2010-08-10

收起

EFFECTS OF HOT FORGING TEMPERATURE ON MICROSTRUCTURE AND MECHANICAL PROPERTY OF TG6 HIGH TEMPERATURE TITANIUM ALLOY

YU Shou ,
TAN Li-Jun ,
GUO Hong-Tian ,
YAO Ze-Kun ,
ZHANG Yong-Jiang

Expand

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072

Received date: 2009-12-21

Revised date: 2010-05-06

Online published: 2010-08-10

Fold

摘要

在850-1075 ℃范围内, 采用恒定的应变速率和变形程度, 对TG6合金进行了近等温锻造实验.利用OM和金相图像分析软件等手段分别测定了TG6合金锻前保温、锻后空冷和锻后热处理试样的显微组织中初生α相的含量, 以及热处理锻件组织中次生片状$\alpha$相的厚度. 结果表明,与锻前保温的合金相比, 较低温度(低于1000℃)下锻造的锻件及其热处理锻件中初生α相含量减少, 且减少程度随锻造温度升高而降低; 而较高温度(大于1000℃)下锻造的锻件及热处锻件中初生α相含量增加, 且增加幅度随锻造温度的升高而增加. 提高锻造温度减小了次生α相形核密度, 造成片状α相厚度随锻造温度的升高而增加. 当在1075℃锻造时, 由于β晶粒过分长大,造成显微组织不均匀. 研究了合金锻件的室温和600℃拉伸性能、冲击韧性及断裂韧性.结果表明, 合金拉伸强度对锻造温度不敏感, 塑性随锻造温度升高而减小, 而室温断裂韧性则随温度升高而增加, 两相区锻造的合金冲击韧性无明显变化, 但当锻造温度接近β相变点时呈现降低趋势. 采用SEM, TEM及OM等手段分析了合金锻件力学性能变化的原因.

关键词： 高温钛合金; 近等温锻造; 显微组织; 力学性能

本文引用格式

王涛 , 谭立军 , 郭鸿镇 , 姚泽坤 , 张永强 . 热锻温度对TG6高温钛合金显微组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2010 , 46(8) : 913 -920 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2009.00851

Abstract

Near–isothermal forging experiments of the TG6 titanium alloy have been conducted at the deformation temperatures ranging from 850 to 1075 ℃with a constant strain rate and deformation degree. The primary α phase content in the alloy after solution, deformation and heat treatment, and the thickness of lamellar α phase in the alloy after heat treatment were measured by OM and image analyzer. The results show that compared to solution state, both forging and forging + heat treatment cause the decrease or increase of primary α phase content when forging temperatures are below or over 1000 ℃. The thickness of the lamellar α phase increases with the increase of forging temperature, which is caused by the decrease of nucleation density of secondary α phase. The β phase grains are so big when the forging temperature is 1075 ℃, while their microstructures are non–uniform. The room temperature and 600℃ tensile properties, impact property and fracture toughness of TG6 alloy have also been measured. It is found that the tensile strength of the TG6 alloy is not very sensitive to forging temperature. The plasticity decreases but the fracture toughness increases with the increase of forging temperature. There is no obvious change in the impact toughness when forging in the α and β double phase field, however it decreases when forging temperature is near the β transformation temperature. The change in mechanical property was explained by SEM, TEM and OM experiments.

Key words： high temperature titanium alloy; near-isothermal forging; microstructure; mechanical property

参考文献

[1] Bania P J. J Met, 1988; 3: 20 [2] Harry Chandler. Heat Treaters’s Guide: Practices and Procedures for Nonferrous Alloys. Ohio: ASM International, 1996: 511 [3] Tetyukhin V. In: Blenkinsop P A, Evans W J, Flower H M, es., Titanium’95: Science and Technoogy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996: 2430 [4] Cai J M, Li Z X, Ma J M, Huang X, Cao C X. Mater Rev, 2005; 19: 50 (蔡建明, 李臻熙, 马济民, 黄旭, 曹春晓. 材料导报, 2005; 19: 50) [5] Zhang J, Li D. The 2 Phase In The High Temperature Titanium. Shenyang: Northeast University Press, 2002: 8 (张均, 李东. 高温钛合金中的$\alpha_{2}$相. 沈阳: 东北大学出版社, 2002: 8) [6] Weiss I, Semiatin S L. Mater Sci Eng, 1998; A243: 46 [7] Sauer C, Luetjering G. J Mater Process Technol, 2001; 117: 311 [8] Guo H Z, Yao Z K, Feng C, Su Z W. Rare Met Mater Eng, 2003; 32: 566 (郭鸿镇, 姚泽坤, 冯超, 苏祖武. 稀有金属材料与工程, 2003; 32: 566) [9] Ma F C, Lu W J, Qin J N, Zhang D. Mater Sci Eng, 2006; A416: 59 [10] Zhang X Y, Zhao Y Q, Bai C G. Titanium Alloys and Application. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2005: 177 (张喜燕, 赵永庆, 白晨光. 钛合金及应用. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2005: 177) [11] Zhou Y G, Zeng W D, Yu H Q. Mater Sci Eng, 2005; A393: 204 [12] Zhou Y G, Zeng W D, Yu H Q. Eng Sci, 2001; 3(5): 61 (周义刚, 曾卫东, 俞汉清. 中国工程科学, 2001; 3(5): 61) [13] Yang Y, Xu F, Huang A J, Li G P. Acta Metall Sin, 2005; 41: 713 (杨义, 徐锋, 黄爱军, 李阁平. 金属学报, 2005; 41: 713) [14] Wang X Y, Liu J R, Lei J F, Cao M Z, Liu Y Y. Acta Metall Sin, 2007; 43: 1129 (王晓燕, 刘建荣, 雷家峰, 曹名洲, 刘羽寅. 金属学报, 2007; 43:1129) [15] Sun Z C, Yang H. Mater Sci Eng, 2009; A523: 184 [16] Kong F T, Chen Y Y, Li B H. Acta Metall Sin, 2008; 44: 815 (孔凡涛, 陈玉勇, 李宝辉. 金属学报, 2008; 44: 815) [17] Terlinde G, Luetjering G. Metall Trans, 1982; 13A: 1283 [18] Duan R, Cai J M, Li Z X. J Aeronaut Mater, 2007; 27(3): 17 (段锐, 蔡建明, 李臻熙. 航空材料学报, 2007; 27(3): 17) [19] Chu M Y, Hui S X, Zhang Z, Shen J Y. J Chin Electron Microsc Soc, 2004; 23: 168 (储茂友, 惠松骁, 张翥, 沈剑韵. 电子显微学报, 2004; 23: 168) [20] Xu F, Li G P, Yang R. Acta Metall Sin, 2006; 42: 770 (徐锋, 李阁平, 杨锐. 金属学报, 2006; 42: 770) [21] Cui Y X, Wang C L. Fractograph Analysis of Metal. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology Press, 1998: 39 (崔约贤, 王长利. 金属断口分析. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学出版社, 1998: 39) [22] Filip R, Kubiak K, ZiajaW, Sieniawski J. J Mater Process Technol, 2003; 133: 84

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献