|
|
Cu56Hf27Ti17 BULK METALLIC GLASS WITH HIGH FRACTURE TOUGHNESS |
ZHU Zhendong, XU Jian |
Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shenyang 110016 |
|
Cite this article:
ZHU Zhendong, XU Jian. Cu56Hf27Ti17 BULK METALLIC GLASS WITH HIGH FRACTURE TOUGHNESS. Acta Metall Sin, 2013, 49(8): 969-975.
|
Abstract As a sort of quasi-brittle materials, fracture toughness of bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) is of paramount importance for their engineering application. Among the BMG families, Cu-based BMGs are of interest due to their low cost, high strength and less brittleness. As indicated in previous work, the Cu49Hf42Al9 BMG exhibits a good combination of toughness and glass forming ability (GFA). Moreover, toughness of BMG significantly depends on alloy composition. In the Zr-Cu-Al system, it was suggested that increasing the Al content in the alloy does not favor to the plasticity of the glass. Then, it is expected that Al-free Cu-Hf-Ti BMGs may be tougher than the Cu49Hf42Al9 BMG. In addition, notched cylindrical samples were used for the toughness assessment in previous investigation, which probably introduce an overestimation in toughness in comparison with archival data of engineering materials. To obtain the glassy plate samples for toughness measurements to meet the ASTM E399 requirement, alloys with robust GFA is necessary. In this work, the composition dependence of GFA for ternary Cu-Hf-Ti alloys was revisited. The alloys with the optimal GFA are located around the Cu56Hf27Ti17 and Cu57Hf27Ti16. The critical diameter to form the BMG rods was determined to be 5 mm. Then, the Cu56Hf27Ti17 BMG plates of 2.5 mm in thickness can be fabricated as the specimens for toughness assessments. Using the single-edge notched specimen for three-point bending test, the notch toughness K Q of Cu56Hf27Ti17 BMG was determined to be(92±10) MPa·m1/2. It is nearly doubled with respect to the Cu49Hf42Al9 BMG (KQ=(56±9) MPa·m1/2).It means that the Cu56Hf27Ti17 BMG is the toughest among currently-available Cu-based BMGs. Such high toughness of Cu56Hf27Ti17 BMG also correlates with its moderate Poisson's ratio (ν=0.361) and low shear modulus (G=38.6 GPa). The enhanced toughness of Cu56Hf27Ti17 BMG is associated with the extended plastic zone size at the notch tip with the proliferation of shear banding events. The fact that the Cu56Hf27Ti17 superior to Cu49Hf42Al9 BMG in toughness seemingly supports that Al element has an unfavorable effect on the toughness of Cu-Zr/Hf-based BMGs.
|
Received: 28 March 2013
|
[1] Greer A, Ma E. MRS Bull, 2007; 32: 611
[2] Schuh C A, Hufnagel T C, Ramamurty U. Acta Mater, 2007; 55: 4067
[3] Meyers M A, Chawla K K. Mechanical Behavior of Materials. 2nd Ed., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 404
[4] Xu J, Ramamurty U, Ma E. JOM, 2010; 62: 10
[5] Demetriou M D, Launey M E, Garrett G, Schramm J P, Hofmann D C, Johnson W L,Ritchie R O. Nat Mater, 2011; 10: 123
[6] He Q, Cheng Y Q, Ma E, Xu J. Acta Mater, 2011; 59: 202
[7] He Q, Shang J K, Ma E, Xu J. Acta Mater, 2012; 60: 4940
[8] Gu X J, Poon S J, Shiflet G J, Lewandowski J J. Acta Mater, 2010; 58: 1708
[9] Schroers J, Johnson W L. Phys Rev Lett, 2004; 93: 255506
[10] Jia P, Guo H, Li Y, Xu J, Ma E. Scr Mater, 2006; 54: 2165
[11] Dai C L, Guo H, Shen Y, Li Y, Ma E, Xu J. Scr Mater, 2006; 54: 1403
[12] Shen Y, Ma E, Xu J. J Mater Sci Technol, 2008; 24: 149
[13] Inoue A, Zhang W, Zhang T, Kurosaka K. J Mater Res, 2001; 16: 2836
[14] Figueroa I A, Davies H A, Todd I. J Alloys Compd, 2007; 434-435: 164
[15] Choi-Yim H, Conner R D. J Alloys Compd, 2008; 459: 160
[16] Jia P, Zhu Z D, Ma E, Xu J. Scr Mater, 2009; 61: 137
[17] Cheng Y Q, Ma E, Sheng H W. Phys Rev Lett, 2009; 102: 245501
[18] Zhang L, Cheng Y Q, Cao A J, Xu J, Ma E. Acta Mater, 2009; 57: 1154
[19] Cheng Y Q, Sheng H W, Ma E. Phys Rev, 2008; 78B: 014207
[20] Cheng Y Q, Cao A J, Ma E. Acta Mater, 2009; 57: 3253
[21] Lewandowski J J, Wang W H, Greer A L. Philos Mag Lett, 2005; 85: 77
[22] Lewandowski J J, Gu X J, Nouri A S, Poon S J, Shiflet G J. Appl Phys Lett,2008; 92: 091918
[23] Conner R D, Rosakis A J, Johnson W L, Owen D M. Scr Mater, 1997; 37: 1373
[24] Demetriou M D, Kaltenboeck G, Suh J Y, Garrett G, Floyd M, Crewdson C,
Hofmann D C, Kozachkov H, Wiest A, Schramm J P, Johnson W L. Appl Phys Lett, 2009; 95: 041907
[25] Suh J Y, Conner R D, Kim C P, Demetriou M D, Johnson W L. J Mater Res, 2010; 25: 982
[26] Lowhaphandu P, Lewandowski J J. Scr Mater, 1998; 38: 1811
[27] Henann D L, Anand L. Acta Mater, 2009; 57: 6057
[28] Kawashima A, Kurishita H, Kimura H, Zhang T, Inoue A. Mater Trans, 2005; 46: 1725
[29] Chen H S, Krause J T, Coleman E. J Non-Cryst Solids, 1975; 18: 157
[30] Wang S G, Shi L L, Xu J. J Mater Res, 2011; 26: 923
[31] Zhu Z D, Jia P, Xu J. Scr Mater, 2011; 64: 785
[32] Johnson W L, Samwer K. Phys Rev Lett, 2005; 95: 195501
[33] He Q, Xu J. J Mater Sci Technol, 2012; 28: 1109
[34] Johnson W L, Demetriou M D, Harmon J S, Lind M L, Samwer K. MRS Bull, 2007; 32: 644
[35] Demetriou M D, Harmon J S, Tao M, Duan G, Samwer K, Johnson W L. Phys Rev Lett, 2006; 97: 065502
|
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|