Please wait a minute...
Acta Metall Sin  2015, Vol. 51 Issue (12): 1441-1448    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2015.00215
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
STUDY OF TWINNING BEHAVIOR OF AZ31 Mg ALLOY DURING PLANE STRAIN COMPRESSION
Bingshu WANG1(),Liping DENG1,Adrien CHAPUIS2,Ning GUO3,Qiang LI1
1 College of Materials Science and Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108
2 College of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044
3 Department of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Materials Science and Energy, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715
Cite this article: 

Bingshu WANG,Liping DENG,Adrien CHAPUIS,Ning GUO,Qiang LI. STUDY OF TWINNING BEHAVIOR OF AZ31 Mg ALLOY DURING PLANE STRAIN COMPRESSION. Acta Metall Sin, 2015, 51(12): 1441-1448.

Download:  HTML  PDF(1164KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

Mg alloy has hexagonal structure and exhibits poor workability at room temperature, which is attributed to the difficulty in activating a sufficient number of independent slips to accommodate the deformation. Twinning plays an important role in plastic deformation of Mg alloys during low and medium temperature to accommodate the imposed strain, especially the strain along the c-axis. Therefore, the twinning behavior of AZ31 Mg alloy during plane strain compression at room temperature was investigated with EBSD in this work. Rectangular specimens with a dimension of 10 mm in length, 9 mm in width and 7 mm in thickness were cut from a hot rolled plate. The results show that {101-2} twinning is dominant when the compression and constraint direction are parallel to transverse direction (TD) and rolling direction (RD) of the plate, respectively. The twinning variant selection mechanism is dominated by the Schmid factor (m) along compression direction, and also related to the constraint direction. The differences of twinning behavior can be interpreted by the twinning strain tensor. For the case when single twinning variant occurs within a grain, the average twinning strain tensor of twinning variant in constraint direction will result in spreading; while for the case there are two or more twinning variants taking place within a grain, the average twinning strain tensor of the variant with higher m will induce spreading in the constraint direction, and that with lower m results in size reducing in the constraint direction. During plane strain compression, different twinning variants coordinate with each other, twinning won't be suppressed until the micro-strain in the constraint direction reaches 0.

Key words:  AZ31 Mg alloy      plane strain      EBSD      twin variant     
Fund: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51301040)

URL: 

https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/10.11900/0412.1961.2015.00215     OR     https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/Y2015/V51/I12/1441

Fig.1  Microstructure and texture (inset) of the as-received AZ31 Mg alloy plate (a) and schematic of sample used for compression testing (b) (TD—transverse direction, RD—rolling direction, ND—normal direction)
Fig.2  EBSD orientation map (a) and pole figures (b) of specimen after plane strain compression at room temperature to a strain of 8%
Fig.3  Misorientation angle and misorientation rotation axis distributions of specimen after compression
Fig.4  Grain orientation distributions of the parent grains and twin bands for deformed specimens
Fig.5  Schmid factor (m) analysis of type I grains (a) and type II grains (b) for {101-2} twinning ( q—titling angle between the c-axis and load axis; mTD and mRD—m along the TD and RD directions, respectively )
Fig.6  Fig.6 m analysis for type I grains along different strain path (mTD + RD—m along the TD+RD directions. Rank 1 refers to twinning on the system with the highest m and rank 6 to the least)

(a) mTD (b) mRD (c) mTD+RD (d) m rank

Fig.7  m analysis for type Ⅱ grains along different strain paths

(a) mTD (b) mRD (c) mTD+RD (d) m rank

Fig.8  Twinning strain tensor (e) analysis for type I grains

(a) along ND (eND) (b) along TD (eTD) (c) along RD (eRD) (d) average twinning strain tensor per variant

Fig.9  Twinning strain tensor (e) analysis for type Ⅱ grains

(a) eND (b) eTD (c) eRD (d) average twinning strain tensor per variant

[1] Liu Q. Acta Metall Sin, 2010; 56: 1458
[1] (刘 庆. 金属学报, 2010; 46: 1458)
[2] Koike J. Metall Mater Trans, 2005; 36A: 1689
[3] Wan G, Wu B L, Zhang Y D, Sha G Y, Esling C. Mater Sci Eng, 2010; A527: 2915
[4] Jiang L, Jonas J J, Mishra R K, Luo A A, Sachdev A K, Godet S. Acta Mater, 2007; 55: 3899
[5] Wang Y N, Huang J C. Acta Mater, 2007; 55: 897
[6] Yang X Y, Zhang L. Acta Metall Sin, 2009; 45: 1303
[6] (杨续跃, 张 雷. 金属学报, 2009; 45: 1303)
[7] Nave M D, Barnett M R. Scr Mater, 2004; 51: 881
[8] Jonas J J, Mu S, Al-Samman T, Gottstein G, Jiang L, Martin T. Acta Mater, 2011; 59: 2046
[9] Luo J R, Godfrey A, Liu W, Liu Q. Acta Mater, 2012; 60: 1986
[10] Ma Q, El Kadiri H, Oppedal A L, Baird J C, Horstemeyer M F, Cherkaoui M. Scr Mater, 2011; 64: 813
[11] Hong S-G, Park S H, Lee C S. Scr Mater, 2011; 64: 145
[12] Martin é, Capolungo L, Jiang L, Jonas J J. Acta Mater, 2010; 58: 3970
[13] Hong S G, Park S H, Lee C S. Acta Mater, 2010; 58: 5873
[14] Godet S, Jiang L, Luo A A, Jonas J J. Scr Mater, 2006; 55: 1055
[15] Wang B S, Xin R L, Huang G J, Liu Q. Scr Mater, 2012; 66: 239
[16] Pei Y. Master Thesis, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 2009
[16] (裴 颖. 清华大学硕士学位论文, 北京, 2009)
[17] Mu S, Jonas J J, Gottstein G. Acta Mater, 2012; 60: 2043
[18] Barnett M R, Keshavarz Z, Beer A G, Ma X. Acta Mater, 2008; 56: 5
[19] Jiang J, Godfrey A, Liu W, Liu Q. Scr Mater, 2008; 58: 122
[20] Al-Samman T, Ahmad B, Gottstein G. Mater Sci Forum, 2007; 550: 229
[21] Chapuis A, Driver J H. Acta Mater, 2011; 59: 1986
[22] Zhang L, Liu C G, Wang H Y, Nan X L, Wu Z Q, Jiang Q C. Mater Sci Eng, 2013; A578: 362
[23] Maurice C, Piot D, Klocker H, Driver J H. Metall Mater Trans, 2005; 36A: 1039
[24] Chapuis A, Wang B S, Liu Q. Mater Sci Eng, 2014; A597: 349
[25] Jiang J, Godfrey A, Liu Q. Mater Sci Technol, 2005; 21: 1417
[26] Wang B, Deng L, Guo N, Xu Z, Li Q. Mater Charact, 2014; 98: 180
[1] ZHAO Yafeng, LIU Sujie, CHEN Yun, MA Hui, MA Guangcai, GUO Yi. Critical Inclusion Size and Void Growth in Dual-Phase Ferrite-Bainite Steel During Ductile Fracture[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(5): 611-622.
[2] GAO Dong, ZHOU Yu, YU Ze, SANG Baoguang. Selection of Twin Variants in Dynamic Plastic Deformation of Pure Ti at Liquid Nitrogen Temperature[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(9): 1141-1149.
[3] ZHOU Hongwei, GAO Jianbing, SHEN Jiaming, ZHAO Wei, BAI Fengmei, HE Yizhu. Twin Boundary Evolution Under Low-Cycle Fatigue of C-HRA-5 Austenitic Heat-Resistant Steel at High Temperature[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(8): 1013-1023.
[4] WANG Jinliang, WANG Chenchong, HUANG Minghao, HU Jun, XU Wei. The Effects and Mechanisms of Pre-Deformation with Low Strain on Temperature-Induced Martensitic Transformation[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(5): 575-585.
[5] WU Xiang,ZUO Xiurong,ZHAO Weiwei,WANG Zhongyang. Mechanism of TiN Fracture During the Tensile Process of NM500 Wear-Resistant Steel[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(2): 129-136.
[6] Xu LI,Qingbo YANG,Xiangze FAN,Yonglin GUO,Lin LIN,Zhiqing ZHANG. Influence of Deformation Parameters on Dynamic Recrystallization of 2195 Al-Li Alloy[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(6): 709-719.
[7] Yan YANG, Guangyu YANG, Shifeng LUO, Lei XIAO, Wanqi JIE. Microstructures and Growth Orientation of Directionally Solidification Mg-14.61Gd Alloy[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(2): 202-212.
[8] Siqian BAO, Bingbing LIU, Gang ZHAO, Yang XU, Shanshan KE, Xiao HU, Lei LIU. Three-Dimensional Morphologies of Abnormally Grown Goss Oriented Grains in Hi-B Steel During Secondary Recrystallization Annealing[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(6): 877-885.
[9] Yanyu LIU, Pingli MAO, Zheng LIU, Feng WANG, Zhi WANG. Theoretical Calculation of Schmid Factor and Its Application Under High Strain Rate Deformation in Magnesium Alloys[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(6): 950-958.
[10] Tingguang LIU, Shuang XIA, Qin BAI, Bangxin ZHOU. Morphological Characteristics and Size Distributions of Three-Dimensional Grains and Grain Boundaries in 316L Stainless Steel[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(6): 868-876.
[11] Yang XU,Siqian BAO,Gang ZHAO,Xiangbin HUANG,Rusheng HUANG,Bingbing LIU,Nana SONG. Three-Dimensional Morphologies of Different Oriented Grains in Hi-B Steel Formed During Early Stage of Secondary Recrystallization Annealing[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(5): 539-548.
[12] Lina WANG,Ping YANG,Weimin MAO. ANALYSIS OF MARTENSITIC TRANSFORMATIONDURING TENSION OF HIGH MANGANESETRIP STEEL AT HIGH STRAIN RATES[J]. 金属学报, 2016, 52(9): 1045-1052.
[13] Pengcheng SONG,Wenbo LIU,Lei CHEN,Chi ZHANG,Zhigang YANG. PHASE-FIELD MODELLING OF THE MARTENSITIC TRANSFORMATION IN SHAPE MEMORYALLOY Au30Cu25Zn45[J]. 金属学报, 2016, 52(8): 1000-1008.
[14] Yue HE,Song XIANG,Wei SHI,Jianmin LIU,Yu LIANG,Chaoyi CHEN. EFFECT OF MICROSTRUCTURAL EVOLUTION ON THE PITTING CORROSION OF COLD DRAWING PEARLITIC STEELS[J]. 金属学报, 2016, 52(12): 1536-1544.
[15] Gongtao LIU,Ping YANG,Weimin MAO. EFFECT OF FINAL ANNEALING ATMOSPHERE ON SECONDARY RECRYSTALLIZATION BEHAVIOR IN THIN GAUGE MEDIUM TEMPERATURE GRAIN ORIENTED SILICON STEEL[J]. 金属学报, 2016, 52(1): 25-32.
No Suggested Reading articles found!