Please wait a minute...
Acta Metall Sin  2016, Vol. 52 Issue (1): 10-16    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2015.00189
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
MgO SECONDARY ELECTRON EMISSION FILM PREPARED BY RADIO-FREQUENCY REACTIVE SPUTERRING
Bin WANG1,2,Liangyin XIONG1,2,Shi LIU1,2()
1 Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
2 Key Laboratory of Nuclear Materials and Safety Assessment, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
Cite this article: 

Bin WANG,Liangyin XIONG,Shi LIU. MgO SECONDARY ELECTRON EMISSION FILM PREPARED BY RADIO-FREQUENCY REACTIVE SPUTERRING. Acta Metall Sin, 2016, 52(1): 10-16.

Download:  HTML  PDF(3587KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

High, stable and durable secondary electron emission is an essential property for the application of dynodes of electron multipliers and photomultiplier tubes. The MgO film have been widely used as dynode materials for the applications owing to its good secondary electron emission properties. In this work, MgO and CoO doped MgO films, as secondary electron emission films, were prepared by radio-frequency reactive sputtering deposition on the stainless steel substrate, and also another MgO film at the surface of activated AgMg alloy was prepared. The effect of preparation processes on the secondary electron emission properties of the films was focused. It was found that the film thickness significantly affected the resistance to electron beam bombardment. With the increase of film thickness, the resistance to electron beam bombardment was significantly enhanced. Radio-frequency reactive sputtering deposition could control the film thickness by varying deposition time. The surface quality of MgO film is quite sensitive to the oxygen partial pressure of the deposition atmosphere. Higher oxygen partial pressure caused higher surface roughness, which was harmful to the secondary electron emission. After doping with CoO, the surface of MgO films were much flatter and smoother, resulting in the improvement of the secondary electron emission coefficient. The CoO doping also reduced of the sensitivity of film surface quality to the oxygen partial pressure. The secondary electron emission coefficient of CoO doped MgO film sharply decreased after heated at 550 ℃ for 1 h due to the surface quality degrading and the thermal decomposition induced loss of oxygen. Elevating the substrate temperature or oxygen partial pressure during deposition accounted for the presence of metallic Mg in film and the degrading of surface quality, which finally lead to lower secondary electron emission coefficient.

Key words:  radio-frequency reactive sputtering      thickness of film      surface roughness      secondary electron emission coefficient      resistance to electron beam bombardment     
Received:  02 April 2015     

URL: 

https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/10.11900/0412.1961.2015.00189     OR     https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/Y2016/V52/I1/10

Fig.1  Secondary electron emission coefficient (d) decay with the electron beam bombardment time (t) of MgO films prepared by activation of AgMg alloy (sample No.1) and radio-frequency reactive sputtering (sample No.2)
Fig.2  Components of elements vs depth of samples No.1 (a) and No.2 (b)
Fig.3  SEM images of MgO films prepared by radio-frequency reactive sputtering with O2/Ar=0.5/42 (a), 1.1/42 (b), 1.7/42 (c) and 2.0/42 (d)
Fig.4  Components of elements vs depth of CoO doped MgO film (sample No.3) (a), and the Co2p binding energy peak position at different sputtering times (b) (The etch time of 100 s corresponds to the depth of about 10 nm from the surface of the sample)
Fig.5  AFM images (a, b) and depth vs distance along the lines in Figs.5a and b (c, d) of samples No.2 (a, c) and No.3 (b, d)
Fig.6  SEM images of surfaces of the CoO doped MgO films prepared by different radio-frequency reactive sputtering processes and thermal treatments
Fig.7  Components of elements vs depth of the CoO doped MgO films prepared by different radio-frequency reactive sputtering processes and thermal treatments
[1] Sommer A H. J Appl Phys, 1958; 29: 598
[2] Zworykin V K, Ruedy J E, Pike E W. J Appl Phys, 1941; 12: 696
[3] Wargo P, Haxby B V, Shepherd W G. J Appl Phys, 1956; 27: 1311
[4] Rappaport P. J Appl Phys, 1954; 25: 288
[5] Kodu M, Aints M, Avarmaa T, Denks V, Feldbach E, Jaaniso R, Kirm M, Maaroos A, Raud J. Appl Surf Sci, 2011; 257: 5328
[6] Kim R, Kim Y H, Park J W. J Mater Sci, 2001; 36: 1469
[7] Ho I C, Xu Y H, Mackenzie J D. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol, 1997; 9: 295
[8] Li C, Luo C T, Wang D S. Vac Cryogenics, 2009; 15(4): 187
[8] (李 晨, 罗崇泰, 王多书. 真空与低温, 2009; 15(4): 187 )
[9] Yu Z N, Zheng D X, Sun J. Vac Electronics, 2000; 1: 56
[9] (喻志农, 郑德修, 孙 鉴. 真空电子技术, 2000; 1: 56)
[10] Park C H, Kim Y K, Lee S H, Lee W G, Sung Y M. Thin Solid Films, 2000; 366: 88
[11] Wang Y, Xu K W. Acta Metall Sin, 2003; 39: 1051
[11] (汪 渊, 徐可为. 金属学报, 2003; 39: 1051)
[12] Lee J S, Ryu B G, Kwon H J, Jeong Y W, Kim H H. Thin Solid Films, 1999; 354: 82
[13] Sugawara A, Mae K. Surf Sci, 2004; 558: 211
[14] Chen T L, Li X M, Yu W D, Zhang X. Appl Phys, 2005; 81A: 657
[15] Takeo N, Takashi F, Shiger B. Vacuum, 2004; 74: 595
[16] Nam K H, Jung M J, Han J G, Kopte T, Hartung U, Peters C. Vacuum, 2004; 75: 1
[17] Lee J H, Jeong T, Yu S G, Jin S, Heo J, Yi W, Jeonb D, Kim J M. Appl Surf Sci, 2001; 174: 62
[18] Khairi I G, Bastawros A M. J Appl Phys, 1982; 53: 5239
[19] Bruining H. Physics and Applications of Secondary Emission. New York, McGraw-Hill: The Pitman Press of Great Britain, 1954: 40
[20] John C C F, Victor E H. J Appl Phys, 1974; 45: 3742
[21] Victor E H, John C C F. Appl Phys Lett, 1973; 7: 23
[22] Prada S F, Livia G, Pacchioni G. J Phys Chem, 2012; 116C: 5781
[23] Cho J H, Park J W. J Vac Sci Technol, 2000; 18A: 329
[24] Gamil A E S, Nagi R E R, Turky G. Solid State Ionics, 2003; 156: 337
[25] Wang B, Xiong L Y, Li M Q, Ge P, Liu S. Chin Pat, CN201320468739.6, 2013
[25] (王 彬, 熊良银, 李明群, 葛 鹏, 刘 实. 中国专利, CN201320468739.6, 2013)
[26] Wang B, Xiong L Y, Liu S. Chin Pat, CN201320441097.0, 2013
[26] (王 彬, 熊良银, 刘 实. 中国专利, CN201320441097.0, 2013)
[27] Dresner J, Goldstein B. J Appl Phys, 1976; 47: 1038
[1] SONG Wenshuo, SONG Zhuman, LUO Xuemei, ZHANG Guangping, ZHANG Bin. Fatigue Life Prediction of High Strength Aluminum Alloy Conductor Wires with Rough Surface[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(8): 1035-1043.
[2] GUO Junli, WEN Guanghua, FU Jiaojiao, TANG Ping, HOU Zibing, GU Shaopeng. Influence of Cooling Rate on the Contraction of Peritectic Transformation During Solidification of Peritectic Steels[J]. 金属学报, 2019, 55(10): 1311-1318.
[3] Yajuan ZHANG, Haibin WANG, Xiaoyan SONG, Zuoren NIE. Preparation and Performance of Spherical Ni Powder for SLM Processing[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(12): 1833-1842.
[4] Lina ZHU,Caiyan DENG,Dongpo WANG,Shengsun HU. EFFECT OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS ON VERY HIGH CYCLE FATIGUE BEHAVIOR OF Ti-6Al-4V ALLOY[J]. 金属学报, 2016, 52(5): 583-591.
[5] YANG Zhenguo; ZHANG Jiming; LI Shouxin; LI Guangyi; WANG Qingyuan HUI Weijun; WENG Yuqing. Estimation of the critical size of inclusion in high strength steel under high cycle fatigue condition[J]. 金属学报, 2005, 41(11): 1136-1142 .
[6] LI Xiaowu; TIAN Jifeng; KANG Yan; WANG Zhongguang(State Key Laboratory for Fatigue and Fracture of Materials; Institute of Metal Research; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Shenyang 110015)(Manuscript received 1994-11-23; in revised form 1995-03-03). QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF FRACTURE[J]. 金属学报, 1995, 31(19): 311-317.
No Suggested Reading articles found!