Please wait a minute...
金属学报  2012, Vol. 48 Issue (8): 915-921    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2012.00159
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
样品取向对AZ31镁合金静态再结晶行为的影响
黄洪涛1,Godfrey Andrew1,刘伟1,唐瑞鹤1,刘庆2
1.清华大学材料科学与工程系, 北京 100084
2.重庆大学材料科学与工程学院, 重庆 400044
EFFECT OF SAMPLE ORIENTATION ON STATIC RECRYSTALLIZATION OF AZ31 MAGNESIUM ALLOY
HUANG Hongtao1, Godfrey Andrew1, LIU Wei1, TANG Ruihe1, LIU Qing2
1.Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084
2.School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044
引用本文:

黄洪涛 Godfrey Andrew 刘伟 唐瑞鹤 刘庆. 样品取向对AZ31镁合金静态再结晶行为的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2012, 48(8): 915-921.
, , , , . EFFECT OF SAMPLE ORIENTATION ON STATIC RECRYSTALLIZATION OF AZ31 MAGNESIUM ALLOY[J]. Acta Metall Sin, 2012, 48(8): 915-921.

全文: PDF(6929 KB)  
摘要: 利用EBSD技术研究了样品取向对AZ31镁合金静态再结晶行为的影响. 采用了沿板材法向切取的试样(0°试样)和沿板材横向切取的试样(90°试样)2种取向的样品, 在150 ℃进行15%单轴压缩变形, 然后在275 ℃保温不同时间进行退火实验. 结果表明, 0°试样15%单轴压缩变形内的变形机制以滑移为主; 90°试样15%单轴压缩变形内的变形机制先以拉伸孪生为主, 然后以滑移为主; 由于变形机制的差异, 相同压缩应变下90°试样比0°试样形变储存能要小. 与0°试样相比, 90°试样相同退火参数下静态再结晶开始及结束时间都被推迟. 随着再结晶过程的进行,90°试样和0°试样2°-4°小角晶界含量均降低, 均在30°取向差角处产生峰值; 绝大多数再结晶晶粒优先在原始晶界处形核, 少数再结晶晶粒在拉伸孪晶内部形核.
关键词 AZ31镁合金 样品取向 形变储存能 静态再结晶    
Abstract:The effect of sample orientation on static recrystallization (SRX) of AZ31 magnesium alloy was investigated with electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) technique. Two kinds of samples, one was cut along the normal direction of the sheet (0? sample), the other along the transverse direction of the sheet (90? sample), were given 15% uniaxial compression strain at 150℃, followed by annealing at 275℃ for different times. The results show that slip dominates the deformation process during 15% uniaxial compression strain for the 0? samples. However, extension twinning firstly dominates the deformation process and then slip dominates the deformation process during 15% uniaxial compression strain for the 90? samples. Due to the different deformation mechanisms, the deformation stored energy of the 90? samples is lower than that of the 0? samples. As a result, the initiation and completion of SRX of the 90? samples are significantly retarded compared with that of the 0? samples. As SRX proceeds, the percentage of low angle grain boundaries between 2? and 4? decreases dramatically and a peak located around 30? appears in misorientation angle distribution map for both the 90? samples and the 0? samples. Most SRX grains nucleate at the original grain boundaries for both the samples. A few SRX grains nucleate within extension twins.
Key wordsAZ31 magnesium alloy    sample orientation    deformation stored energy    static recrystallization
收稿日期: 2012-03-27     
ZTFLH: 

TG146.2

 
基金资助:

国家重点基础研究发展计划资助项目2007CB613703

作者简介: 黄洪涛, 男, 1983年生, 博士生
[1] Beer A G, Barnett M R. Mater Sci Eng, 2008; A485: 318

[2] Robson J D, Henry D T, Davis B. Acta Mater, 2009; 57: 2739

[3] Li X, Yang P, Wang L N, Meng L, Cui F. Mater Sci Eng, 2009; A517: 160

[4] Yi S B, Schestakow I, Zaefferer S. Mater Sci Eng, 2009; A516: 58

[5] Jager A, Lukac P V. Gartnerova V, Haloda J, Dopita M. Mater Sci Eng, 2006; A432: 20

[6] Huang X S, Suzuki K, Chino Y. J Alloys Compd, 2011; 509: 4854

[7] Mackenzie L W F, Pekguleryuz M. Mater Sci Eng, 2008; A480: 189

[8] Liu Q. Acta Metall Sin, 2010; 46: 1458

(刘庆. 金属学报, 2010; 46: 1458)

[9] Perez–Prado M T, Ruano O A. Scr Mater, 2002; 46: 149

[10] Perez–Prado M T, Ruano O A. Scr Mater, 2003; 48: 59

[11] Jiang J, Godfrey A, Liu W, Liu Q. Mater Sci Eng, 2008; A483: 576

[12] Humphreys F J, Hatherly M. Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena. 2Ed., Oxford: Pergamon Press, 2004: 222

[13] Huang H T, Liu W, Godfrey A, Tang R H, Liu Q. Acta Metall Sin, 2012; 48: 357

(黄洪涛, 刘伟, Godfrey A, 唐瑞鹤, 刘庆. 金属学报, 2012; 48: 357)

[14] Yang X Y, Zhang L. Acta Metall Sin, 2009; 45: 1303

(杨续跃, 张雷. 金属学报, 2009; 45: 1303)

[15] Wang M Y, Xin R L, Wang B S, Liu Q. Mater Sci Eng, 2011; A528: 2941

[16] Brown D W, Agnew S R, Bourke M A M, Holden T M, Vogel S C, Tome C N. Mater Sci Eng, 2005; A399: 1

[17] Clausen B , Tom´e C N, Brown D W, Agnew S R. Acta Mater, 2008; 56: 2456

[18] Li X, Yang P, Meng L, Cui F E. Acta Metall Sin, 2010;46: 147

(李萧, 杨平, 孟利, 崔凤娥. 金属学报, 2010; 46: 147)

[19] Al–Samman T, Molodov K D, Molodov D A, Gottstein G, Suwas S. Acta Mater, 2012; 60: 537

[20] Galiyev A, Kaibyshev R, Gottstein G. Acta Mater, 2001; 49: 1199

[21] Jin Q L, Shim S Y, Lim S G. Scr Mater, 2006; 55: 843

[22] Stanford N, Geng J, Chun Y B, Davies C H J, Nie J F, Barnett M R. Acta Mater, 2012; 60: 218

[23] Barnett M R, Keshavarz Z, Ma X. Metall Mater Trans, 2006; 37A: 2283

[24] Al–Samman T, Gottstein G. Mater Sci Eng, 2008; A490: 411
[1] 陈扬, 毛萍莉, 刘正, 王志, 曹耕晟. 高速冲击载荷下预压缩AZ31镁合金的退孪生行为与动态力学性能[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(5): 660-672.
[2] 王雪梅, 殷正正, 于晓彤, 邹玉红, 曾荣昌. AZ31镁合金表面苯丙氨酸、甲硫氨酸和天冬酰胺诱导Ca-P涂层耐蚀性能比较[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(10): 1258-1271.
[3] 韩林原, 李旋, 储成林, 白晶, 薛烽. 流场环境中AZ31镁合金的腐蚀行为研究[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(10): 1347-1356.
[4] 闫亚琼,罗晋如,张济山,庄林忠. 强织构AZ31镁合金板材深低温轧制过程中微观组织演变及力学性能控制研究[J]. 金属学报, 2017, 53(1): 107-113.
[5] 汪炳叔,邓丽萍,CHAPUIS Adrien,郭宁,李强. AZ31镁合金在平面应变压缩过程中的孪生行为研究*[J]. 金属学报, 2015, 51(12): 1441-1448.
[6] 黄洪涛,Godfrey Andrew,刘伟,付宝勤,刘庆. 多向压缩中AZ31镁合金变形行为的EBSD跟踪研究[J]. 金属学报, 2013, 49(8): 932-938.
[7] 娄超,张喜燕,汪润红,段高林,刘庆. 退孪生行为以及{1012},孪晶片层结构对镁合金力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2013, 49(3): 291-296.
[8] 孙朝阳 栾京东 刘赓 李瑞 张清东. AZ31镁合金热变形流动应力预测模型[J]. 金属学报, 2012, 48(7): 853-860.
[9] 罗晋如,刘庆,刘伟,Godfrey Andrew. 轧制温度对AZ31镁合金轧制板材中的{1011}-{1012}双孪生行为的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2012, 48(6): 717-724.
[10] 刚建伟,施斌卿,陈荣石,柯伟. 热轧Mg-1Zn和Mg-1Y合金退火组织演变及静态再结晶行为[J]. 金属学报, 2012, 48(5): 526-533.
[11] 罗晋如 刘庆 刘伟 Godfrey Andrew. AZ31镁合金板轧制过程中的{10-11}-{10-12}双孪生对板材显微组织、织构、力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2011, 47(12): 1567-1574.
[12] 王东 刘杰 肖伯律 马宗义. 铝合金/镁合金搅拌摩擦焊接界面处Mg/Al反应及接头力学性能[J]. 金属学报, 2010, 46(5): 589-594.
[13] 高英俊 罗志荣 胡项英 黄创高. 相场方法模拟AZ31镁合金的静态再结晶过程[J]. 金属学报, 2010, 46(10): 1161-1172.
[14] 王丽娜 杨平 夏伟军 陈振华 陈鼎 李萧 孟利. 特殊成形工艺下AZ31镁合金的织构及变形机制[J]. 金属学报, 2009, 45(1): 58-62.
[15] 王健; 肖宏; 张志国 . 流变应力逆分析确定静态再结晶动力学模型[J]. 金属学报, 2008, 44(7): 837-842 .