Please wait a minute...
Acta Metall Sin  2017, Vol. 53 Issue (10): 1227-1237    DOI: 10.11900/0412.1961.2017.00270
Orginal Article Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Research Progress in Biodegradable Metals forStent Application
Yufeng ZHENG(), Hongtao YANG
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Cite this article: 

Yufeng ZHENG, Hongtao YANG. Research Progress in Biodegradable Metals forStent Application. Acta Metall Sin, 2017, 53(10): 1227-1237.

Download:  HTML  PDF(4431KB) 
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

During the last two decades, a great amount of researches have been focused on biodegradable metals. Technologies from alloy design to melting, manufacturing and processing, from micro-tube to stent laser processing and drug eluting coating have been improved and optimized continuously. Biodegradable metallic stent has evolved from a concept to a real product and generated three branches of material system. A large amount of animal tests and clinical tests have been carried out to investigate biodegradable magnesium stents. Results of clinical study have indicated that the magnesium stent is feasible, with favourable safety and performance outcomes. More importantly, Biotronik won CE Mark for Magmaris bioresorbable stent in 2016. Researches of biodegradable iron stents are still in the stage of animal tests. The nitrided iron stent possesses excellent mechanical properties. Results showed a good long-term biocompatibility of nitrided iron stent in rabbit and porcine model. Biodegradable zinc stent has only been introduced in recent years. Only a few in vivo studies have been reported with zinc wires implanted in rats. Results showed a good degradation behavior and biocompatibility of zinc wires. In this paper, the current research status of biodegradable metallic stents is reviewed, and the future research and development in mechanical property optimization, drug eluting and intelligence is proposed.

Key words:  biodegradable metallic stent      magnesium alloy      iron alloy      zinc alloy      biocompatibility      in vivo      degradation mechanism     
Received:  04 July 2017     
ZTFLH:  R318.08  
Fund: Supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (No.2016YFC1102402) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51431002)

URL: 

https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/10.11900/0412.1961.2017.00270     OR     https://www.ams.org.cn/EN/Y2017/V53/I10/1227

Fig.1  Schematic diagram of degradation behavior and the change of mechanical integrity of biodegradable metallic stents during the vascular healing process[1]
Fig.2  SEM images (upper panels) and EDX mapping of AMS-3.0 degradation products (lower panels, unrelated to upper panels) (At 28 d, non-degraded magnesium-alloy particles had been surrounded by magnesium, calcium, and oxygen, probably in the form of MgCO3 or Mg(OH)2 or both, which could not be differentiated without further analysis. At 90 d, magnesium-alloy area was reduced, while oxidated (yellow) areas had become partly replaced at their outer margins by a calcium-phosphorous-oxygen compound (bluish area). Raman and infrared spectroscopy combined with X-ray diffraction analysis clarified that this was calcium phosphate with amorphous structure. At 180 d, no remaining metallic particles were noted)[23]
Criterion Constraint
Biodegradation Mechanical integrity for 3~6 months; Full absorption in 12~24 months
Biocompatibility Non-toxic and non-inflammatory; No allergenic potential; No harmful
release or retention of particles
Mechanical Yield strength>200 MPa; Ultimate tensile strength>300 MPa; Yield
properties strength : elastic modulus ratio>0.16; Elongation to failure>15%~18%;
Elastic recoil on expansion<4%
Microstructure Homogeneous and approximately isotopic
Small grain size <30 μm
Corrosion rate Penetration rate<0.02 mma-1
Table 1  Summary of material criteria and constraints for a biodegradable stent[9]
Test Stent system Experiment Biocompatibility Degradation Ref.
model time
Animal AE21 Domestic No thromboembolic events, 40% loss of 89 d [17]
test pigs, coronary lumen diameter corresponding to
artery neointimal formation, 25% re-enlargement
caused by vascular remodeling resulting
from the loss of mechanical integrity
between days 35 and 56
AZ91 Dogs, Lumen was clear and no elastic recoil and 7 d [18]
coronary or thrombosis, moderate intimal hyperplasia
femoral artery at 14 d
AZ31B Rabbits, Lumen area was significantly greater, the 120 d [19]
P(LA-TMC)+ abdominal neointimal area was significantly smaller
sirolimus aorta and endothelialization was delayed at 30 d
in coated group
WE43 Minipigs, Inhibitory effect on the smooth muscle 98 d [20]
coronary cells, rapid endothelialization, thin layer of
artery neointima covering the stent after 6 d,
degradation caused inflammation and
intimal hyperplasia
AMS Pigs, No signs of ongoing inflammation, 2 months [21]
coronary smallest lumen area at 3 months because
artery of negative vascular remodeling
AMS Pigs, Safe and with less neointimal formation - [22]
coronary compared with stainless stent, lumen area
artery did not change
AMS-3.0 Pigs, Equivalent to TAXUS Liberte regrading 180 d [23]
PLGA+ coronary late luminal loss, intimal area, fibrin
paclitaxel artery score and endothelialization. Inflammation
score was high at 28 d but disappeared at
later time
Clinical AMS Preterm baby, No relevant inflammatory reaction to the 5 months [24]
study pulmonary stent material, minimal alteration of the
artery vessel wall and an increase of the arterial
diameter after stenting
AMS Newborn, 15 d after implantation, blood velocity - [25]
aortic arch increased significantly, blood perfusion
recovered, lumen diameter increased
from 1.5~1.8 mm to 2~2.8 mm
AMS 20 patients The clinical patency rate was 89.5% after 3 - [26]
months, no blood toxicity was found
PROGRESS- 63 patients No myocardial infarction, subacute or late 4 months [27]
AMS thrombosis, or death. Angiography at 4
months showed an increased diameter
stenosis of 48.4. Overall target lesion
revascularization rate was 45% after 1 a.
Neointimal growth and negative
remodeling were the main mechanisms
of restenosis
Biosolve-I 46 patients Target lesion failure was 7% at 12 months. - [28]
DREAMS, A significant reduction of lumen area at 6
PLGA+ months and 12 months follow-up. No cardiac
paclitaxel death or scaffold thrombosis
Biosolve-II 123 patients A preservation of the scaffold area with a 12 months [8,29]
DREAMS 2G, low mean neointmal area. Target lesion
PLLA+ failure was 4%. No definite or probable
sirolimus scaffold thrombosis was observed. QCA
parameters remained stable from 6 months
to 12 months. Target lesion failure was
3.4% at 12 months
Table 2  In vivo tests of biodegradable Mg based stents[17-29]
Fig.2  SEM images (upper panels) and EDX mapping of AMS-3.0 degradation products (lower panels, unrelated to upper panels) (At 28 d, non-degraded magnesium-alloy particles had been surrounded by magnesium, calcium, and oxygen, probably in the form of MgCO3 or Mg(OH)2 or both, which could not be differentiated without further analysis. At 90 d, magnesium-alloy area was reduced, while oxidated (yellow) areas had become partly replaced at their outer margins by a calcium-phosphorous-oxygen compound (bluish area). Raman and infrared spectroscopy combined with X-ray diffraction analysis clarified that this was calcium phosphate with amorphous structure. At 180 d, no remaining metallic particles were noted)[23]
Stent system Animal model Biocompatibility Exp. period Ref.
Iron Rabbits, No thromboembolic complications, no 6~18 months [35]
descending adverse events. No significant neointimal
aorta proliferation, no pronounced inflammatory
response and no systemic toxicity
Iron Pigs, No signs of iron overload or iron-related organ 360 d [36]
descending aorta toxicity, no local or systemic toxicity
Iron Pigs, coronary At 28 d, no stent particle embolization or thrombosis 28 d [37]
artery and no excess inflammation, or fibrin deposition
Iron Rats, artery Substantial corrosion at 22 d, a voluminous 9 months [38]
lumen or wall corrosion product retained within the vessel
wall at 9 months. Implant in artery lumen
experienced minimal corrosion
Nitrided iron Minipigs, iliac Endothelialization after 1 month. Slightly lumen loss 12 months [39]
artery at 12 months. No thrombosis or local tissue necrosis
Nitrided iron Zn+ Rabbits, Complete endothelialization after 3 months, 13 months [40]
PDLLA+ abdominal slight inflammation during implantation,
sirolimus aorta no necrosis and systemic toxicity
Iron, nitrided iron Rabbits, Endothelialization after 7 d. Slight 53 months [7]
abdominal inflammation during implantation. No
aorta,pigs, necrosis and systemic toxicity. Corrosion
coronary artery products can be cleaned by macrophages
Table 3  In vivo tests of biodegradable Fe based stents[7,35-40]
Fig.3  SEM, EDS (a) and micro-CT (b) images of iron based scaffold (IBS) after 6 months implantation in rabbit abdominal aorta[34]
Implant Animal model Biocompatibility Experimental Ref.
period
Zinc Rat, abdominal Retained about 70% of its original cross 6 months [46]
wire aorta wall sectional area after 4 months, after which
degradation was observed to increase
rapidly. Corrosion products consisted
of ZnO, ZnCO3 and trace of Ca/P
Zinc Rat, abdominal A complete endothelial layer at 2.5 months 6 months [47]
wire aorta wall and stable appearance at 6.5 months.
Smooth muscle cells remained stable at
6.5 months, no pronounced chronic
inflammation
ZnAl Rat, abdominal No acute and chronic inflammatory were 6 months [48]
wire aorta wall presented, no necrosis. Cross-section was
reduction 40%~50% at 6 months
ZnAl Rat, abdominal Inflammatory cells were able to penetrate 6 months [49]
wire aorta wall the corrosion layer of ZnAl implant. A
delayed entrance of inflammatory cells
into corrosion layer of pure Zn was observed
ZnLi Rat, abdominal Degradation rates were 0.008 and 0.045 mm/a 12 months [50]
wire aorta wall at 2 and 12 months, respectively. No neointimal
hyperplasia. Inflammation and neointima
thickness was slightly higher for ZnLi than Zn
Zinc Rat, abdominal Intense fibrous encapsulation of the wire, steady 20 months [51]
wire aorta wall corrosion without local toxicity for up to 20
months. Chronic inflammation at 5~8 months
but subsided between 10~20 months
Zinc Rabbit, No severe inflammation, platelet aggregation, 12 months [52]
stent abdominal thrombosis formation or obvious intimal
aorta hyperplasia was observed
Table 4  In vivo tests of biodegradable Zn wires[46-52]
Fig.4  Zn-H2O (a) and Zn-C-H2O (b) Pourbaix diagrams for physiological concentrations at 310 K (The dotted lines show physiological pH of 7.4. The physiological potential for tissue fluid is indicated by circles. E—potential)[51]
Fig.5  Schematic diagrams showing the evolution of degradation mechanism of zinc stent associated with the conversion of degradation microenvironments during healing process(a, b) formation of zinc phosphate under the dynamic flow condition in blood fluid(c, d) conversion of zinc phosphate to ZnO and calcium phosphate under the diffusion condition in neointimal. SEM images corresponding to the related schematic diagrams are consisted of representative surface morphologies and cross-sections. The timeline depicts the healing process including inflammation, granulation and remodeling phases and selected time points. The models explain the formation of corrosion products and their dependence on local pH, distance from stent surface and implantation time in blood fluid (e) and neointimal (f). The red lines represent the assumed pH variation on the sample surface[52]
[1] Zheng Y F, Gu X N, Witte F.Biodegradable metals[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2014, R77: 1
[2] Zheng Y F, Wu Y H.Revolutionizing metallic biomaterials[J]. Acta. Metall. Sin., 2017, 53: 257(郑玉峰,吴远浩. 处在变革中的医用金属材料[J]. 金属学报,2017, 53: 257)
[3] Yu Y, Zhang W C, Duan X R.Study on microstructure and properties of thin tube of AZ31 magnesium alloy by extrusion technology[J]. Powder Metall. Technol., 2013, 31 : 201(于洋, 张文丛, 段祥瑞. AZ31镁合金细管静液挤压工艺及组织性能分析[J]. 粉末冶金技术, 2013, 31 : 201)
[4] Liu F, Chen C X, Niu J L, et al.The processing of Mg alloy micro-tubes for biodegradable vascular stents[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2015, C48: 400
[5] Liu X W, Sun J K, Yang Y H, et al.In vitro investigation of ultra-pure Zn and its mini-tube as potential bioabsorbable stent material[J]. Mater. Lett., 2015, 161: 53
[6] Grogan J A, Leen S B, Mchugh P E.Comparing coronary stent material performance on a common geometric platform through simulated bench testing[J]. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2012, 12: 129
[7] Lin W J, Qin L, Qi H P, et al.Long-term in vivo corrosion behavior, biocompatibility and bioresorption mechanism of a bioresorbable nitrided iron scaffold[J]. Acta Biomater., 2017, 54: 454
[8] Haude M, Ince H, Abizaid A, et al.Sustained safety and performance of the second-generation drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold in patients with de novo coronary lesions: 12-month clinical results and angiographic findings of the BIOSOLVE-II first-in-man trial[J]. Eur. Heart J., 2016, 37: 2701
[9] Bowen P K, Shearier E R, Zhao S, et al.Biodegradable metals for cardiovascular stents: From clinical concerns to recent Zn-alloys[J]. Adv. Healthc. Mater., 2016, 5: 1121
[10] Zheng Y F, Liu B, Gu X N.Research progress in biodegradable metallic materials for medical application[J]. Mater. Rev., 2009, 23(1): 1(郑玉峰, 刘彬, 顾雪楠. 可生物降解性医用金属材料的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2009, 23(1): 1)
[11] Sigel H.Metal Ions in Biological System[M]. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc, 1986: 1
[12] Bowman B A, Russell R M.Present Knowledge in Nutrition[M]. 8th Ed., Washington, DC: International Life Science Institute, 2001: 1
[13] Fawcett W, Haxby E, Male D A.Magnesium: Physiology and pharmacology[J]. Br. J. Anaesth., 1999, 83: 302
[14] Gu X N, Zheng Y F, Cheng Y, et al.In vitro corrosion and biocompatibility of binary magnesium alloys[J]. Biomaterials, 2009, 30: 484
[15] Ma J, Zhao N, Zhu D H.Biphasic responses of human vascular smooth muscle cells to magnesium ion[J]. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 2016, 104A: 347
[16] Zhao N, Zhu D H.Endothelial responses of magnesium and other alloying elements in magnesium-based stent materials[J]. Metallomics, 2015, 7: 118
[17] Heublein B, Rohde R, Kaese V, et al.Biocorrosion of magnesium alloys: A new principle in cardiovascular implant technology?[J]. Heart, 2003, 89: 651
[18] Yue Y N, Wang L L, Yang N, et al.Effectiveness of biodegradable magnesium alloy stents in coronary artery and femoral artery[J]. J. Interv. Cardiol., 2015, 28: 358
[19] Li H W, Zhong H S, Xu K, et al.Enhanced efficacy of sirolimus-eluting bioabsorbable magnesium alloy stents in the prevention of restenosis[J]. J. Endovasc. Ther., 2011, 18: 407
[20] Mario C D, Griffiths H, Goktekin O, et al.Drug-eluting bioabsorb able magnesium stent[J]. J. Interv. Cardiol., 2004, 17: 391
[21] Maeng M, Jensen L O, Falk E, et al.Negative vascular remode-lling after implantation of bioabsorbable magnesium alloy stents in porcine coronary arteries: A randomised comparison with bare-metal and sirolimus-eluting stents[J]. Heart, 2009, 95: 241
[22] Waksman R, Pakala R, Kuchulakanti P K, et al.Safety and efficacy of bioabsorbable magnesium alloy stents in porcine coronary arteries[J]. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv., 2006, 68: 607
[23] Wittchow E, Adden N, Riedmueller J, et al.Bioresorbable drug-eluting magnesium-alloy scaffold: Design and feasibility in a porcine coronary model[J]. EuroIntervention, 2013, 8: 1441
[24] Zartner P, Buettner M, Singer H, et al.First biodegradable metal stent in a child with congenital heart disease: Evaluation of macro and histopathology[J]. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv., 2007, 69: 443
[25] Schranz D, Zartner P, Michel-Behnke I, et al.Bioabsorbable metal stents for percutaneous treatment of critical recoarctation of the aorta in a newborn[J]. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv., 2006, 67: 671
[26] Peeters P, Bosiers M, Verbist J, et al.Preliminary results after application of absorbable metal stents in patients with critical limb ischemia[J]. J. Endovasc. Ther., 2005, 12: 1
[27] Erbel R, Mario C D, Bartunek J, et al.Temporary scaffolding of coronary arteries with bioabsorbable magnesium stents: A prospective, non-randomised multicentre trial[J]. Lancet, 2007, 369: 1869
[28] Haude M, Erbel R, Erne P, et al.Safety and performance of the drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold (DREAMS) in patients with de-novo coronary lesions: 12 month results of the prospective, multicentre, first-in-man BIOSOLVE-I trial[J]. Lancet, 2013, 381: 836
[29] Haude M, Ince H, Abizaid A, et al.Safety and performance of the second-generation drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold in patients with de-novo coronary artery lesions (BIOSOLVE-II): 6 month results of a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised, first-in-man trial[J]. Lancet, 2016, 387: 31
[30] Andrews N C.Disorders of iron metabolism[J]. New Engl. J. Med., 1999, 341: 1986
[31] Hermawan H, Dubé D, Mantovani D.Developments in metallic biodegradable stents[J]. Acta Biomater., 2010, 6: 1693
[32] Mueller P P, May T, Perz A, et al.Control of smooth muscle cell proliferation by ferrous iron[J]. Biomaterials, 2006, 27: 2193
[33] Zhu S F, Huang N, Xu L, et al.Biocompatibility of pure iron: in vitro assessment of degradation kinetics and cytotoxicity on endothelial cells[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2009, C29: 1589
[34] Lin W J, Zhang D Y, Zhang G, et al.Design and characterization of a novel biocorrodible iron-based drug-eluting coronary scaffold[J]. Mater. Des., 2016, 91: 72
[35] Peuster M, Wohlsein P, Brügmann M, et al.A novel approach to temporary stenting: Degradable cardiovascular stents produced from corrodible metal-results 6-18 months after implantation into New Zealand white rabbits[J]. Heart, 2001, 86: 563
[36] Peuster M, Hesse C, Schloo T, et al.Long-term biocompatibility of a corrodible peripheral iron stent in the porcine descending aorta[J]. Biomaterials, 2006, 27: 4955
[37] Waksman R, Pakala R, Baffour R, et al.Short-term effects of biocorrodible iron stents in porcine coronary arteries[J]. J. Interv. Cardiol., 2008, 21: 15
[38] Pierson D, Edick J, Tauscher A, et al.A simplified in vivo approach for evaluating the bioabsorbable behavior of candidate stent materials[J]. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 2012, 100B: 58
[39] Peuster M, Hesse C, Schloo T, et al.Long-term biocompatibility of a corrodible peripheral iron stent in the porcine descending aorta[J]. Biomaterials, 2006, 27: 4955
[40] Lin W J, Zhang D Y, Zhang G, et al.Design and characterization of a novel biocorrodible iron-based drug-eluting coronary scaffold[J]. Mater. Des., 2016, 91: 72
[41] Hermawan H, Purnama A, Dube D, et al.Fe-Mn alloys for metallic biodegradable stents: Degradation and cell viability studies[J]. Acta Biomater., 2010, 6: 1852
[42] Kaur K, Gupta R, Saraf S A, et al.Zinc: The metal of life[J]. Compr. Rev. Food. Sci. Food Saf., 2014, 13: 358
[43] Little P J, Bhattacharya R, Moreyra A E, et al.Zinc and cardiovascular disease[J]. Nutrition, 2010, 26: 1050
[44] Ma J, Zhao N, Zhu D H.Endothelial cellular responses to biodegradable metal zinc[J]. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng., 2015, 1: 1174
[45] Ma J, Zhao N, Zhu D H.Bioabsorbable zinc ion induced biphasic cellular responses in vascular smooth muscle cells[J]. Sci. Rep., 2016, 6: 26661
[46] Bowen P K, Drelich J, Goldman J.Zinc exhibits ideal physiological corrosion behavior for bioabsorbable stents[J]. Adv. Mater., 2013, 25: 2577
[47] Bowen P K, Guillory II R J, Shearier E R, et al. Metallic zinc exhibits optimal biocompatibility for bioabsorbable endovascular stents[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2015, C56: 467
[48] Bowen P K, Seitz J M, Guillory II R J, et al. Evaluation of wrought Zn-Al alloys (1, 3, 5 wt % Al) through mechanical and in vivo testing for stent applications [J]. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 2017, B, doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33850
[49] Guillory II R J, Bowen P K, Hopkins S P, et al. Corrosion characteristics dictate the long-term inflammatory profile of degradable zinc arterial implants[J]. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng., 2016, 2: 2355
[50] Zhao S, Seitz J M, Eifler R, et al.Zn-Li alloy after extrusion and drawing: Structural, mechanical characterization, and biodegradation in abdominal aorta of rat[J]. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2017, C76: 301
[51] Drelich A, Zhao S, Guillory II R J, et al. Long-term surveillance of zinc implant in murine artery: Surprisingly steady biocorrosion rate[J]. Acta Biomater., 2017, 58: 539
[52] Yang H T, Wang C, Liu C Q, et al.Evolution of the degradation mechanism of pure zinc stent in the one-year study of rabbit abdominal aorta model, Biomaterials, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.08.022
[53] Nakazawa G, Granada J F, Alviar C L, et al.Anti-CD34 antibodies immobilized on the surface of sirolimus-eluting stents enhance stent endothelialization[J]. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv., 2010, 3: 68
[54] Swanson N, Hogrefe K, Javed Q, et al.Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-eluting stents: in vivo effects on thrombosis, endothelialization and intimal hyperplasia[J]. J. Invasive Cardiol., 2003, 15: 688
[1] SHAO Xiaohong, PENG Zhenzhen, JIN Qianqian, MA Xiuliang. Unravelling the {101¯2} Twin Intersection Between LPSO Structure/SFs in Magnesium Alloy[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(4): 556-566.
[2] WANG Luning, YIN Yuxia, SHI Zhangzhi, HAN Qianqian. Research Progress on Biocompatibility Evaluation of Biomedical Degradable Zinc Alloys[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(3): 319-334.
[3] ZHU Yunpeng, QIN Jiayu, WANG Jinhui, MA Hongbin, JIN Peipeng, LI Peijie. Microstructure and Properties of AZ61 Ultra-Fine Grained Magnesium Alloy Prepared by Mechanical Milling and Powder Metallurgy Processing[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(2): 257-266.
[4] TANG Weineng, MO Ning, HOU Juan. Research Progress of Additively Manufactured Magnesium Alloys: A Review[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(2): 205-225.
[5] CUI Zhenduo, ZHU Jiamin, JIANG Hui, WU Shuilin, ZHU Shengli. Research Progress of the Surface Modification of Titanium and Titanium Alloys for Biomedical Application[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(7): 837-856.
[6] CHEN Yang, MAO Pingli, LIU Zheng, WANG Zhi, CAO Gengsheng. Detwinning Behaviors and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Precompressed AZ31 Magnesium Alloy Subjected to High Strain Rates Impact[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(5): 660-672.
[7] ZENG Xiaoqin, WANG Jie, YING Tao, DING Wenjiang. Recent Progress on Thermal Conductivity of Magnesium and Its Alloys[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(4): 400-411.
[8] LI Shaojie, JIN Jianfeng, SONG Yuhao, WANG Mingtao, TANG Shuai, ZONG Yaping, QIN Gaowu. Multimodal Microstructure of Mg-Gd-Y Alloy Through an Integrated Simulation of Process-Structure-Property[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(1): 114-128.
[9] ZHENG Yufeng, XIA Dandan, SHEN Yunong, LIU Yunsong, XU Yuqian, WEN Peng, TIAN Yun, LAI Yuxiao. Additively Manufactured Biodegrabable Metal Implants[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(11): 1499-1520.
[10] PAN Fusheng, JIANG Bin. Development and Application of Plastic Processing Technologies of Magnesium Alloys[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(11): 1362-1379.
[11] WANG Huiyuan, XIA Nan, BU Ruyu, WANG Cheng, ZHA Min, YANG Zhizheng. Current Research and Future Prospect on Low-Alloyed High-Performance Wrought Magnesium Alloys[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(11): 1429-1437.
[12] WANG Xuemei, YIN Zhengzheng, YU Xiaotong, ZOU Yuhong, ZENG Rongchang. Comparison of Corrosion Resistance of Phenylalanine, Methionine, and Asparagine-Induced Ca-P Coatings on AZ31 Magnesium Alloys[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(10): 1258-1271.
[13] ZHANG Yang, SHAO Jianbo, CHEN Tao, LIU Chuming, CHEN Zhiyong. Deformation Mechanism and Dynamic Recrystallization of Mg-5.6Gd-0.8Zn Alloy During Multi-Directional Forging[J]. 金属学报, 2020, 56(5): 723-735.
[14] Rongchang ZENG, Lanyue CUI, Wei KE. Biomedical Magnesium Alloys: Composition, Microstructure and Corrosion[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(9): 1215-1235.
[15] Yanyu LIU, Pingli MAO, Zheng LIU, Feng WANG, Zhi WANG. Theoretical Calculation of Schmid Factor and Its Application Under High Strain Rate Deformation in Magnesium Alloys[J]. 金属学报, 2018, 54(6): 950-958.
No Suggested Reading articles found!