Please wait a minute...
金属学报  2014, Vol. 50 Issue (3): 373-378    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2013.00314
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 |
海水温度和浓缩度对316L不锈钢点蚀性能的影响*
辛森森1,2, 李谋成1,2(), 沈嘉年1,2
1 上海大学材料研究所, 上海200072
2 上海大学微结构重点实验室,上海200444
EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE AND CONCENTRATION RATIO ON PITTING RESISTANCE OF 316L STAINLESS STEEL IN SEAWATER
XIN Sensen1,2, LI Moucheng1,2(), SHEN Jianian1,2
1 Institute of Materials, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072
2 Laboratory for Microstructure, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444
引用本文:

辛森森, 李谋成, 沈嘉年. 海水温度和浓缩度对316L不锈钢点蚀性能的影响*[J]. 金属学报, 2014, 50(3): 373-378.
Sensen XIN, Moucheng LI, Jianian SHEN. EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE AND CONCENTRATION RATIO ON PITTING RESISTANCE OF 316L STAINLESS STEEL IN SEAWATER[J]. Acta Metall Sin, 2014, 50(3): 373-378.

全文: PDF(5138 KB)   HTML
摘要: 

运用循环阳极极化曲线研究了不同温度和浓缩度的海水介质中316L不锈钢的点蚀行为. 结果表明, 在1~3倍浓缩度范围内, 316L不锈钢的点蚀电位和再钝化电位均随着温度的升高而线性降低, 但当浓缩度高于2倍、温度大于85 ℃时, 点蚀电位变化较小; 在25~95 ℃温度范围内, 点蚀电位和再钝化电位与海水浓缩度的对数呈线性关系. 浓缩度对316L不锈钢点蚀性能的影响比温度更小, 并根据点缺陷理论分析了二者对点蚀的作用机制.

关键词 不锈钢点蚀浓缩海水温度    
Abstract

Due to a serious shortage of natural fresh water in many areas all over the world, the seawater desalination has emerged as an effective compensation way to meet the consumption requirements. Due to the good corrosion resistance and low cost, stainless steels have been used extensively to construct the multi effect distillation (MED) plants, especially type 316L stainless steel for the evaporation chambers. However, with the application and development of low temperature MED, there is increasingly need of higher temperature distillation and higher brine concentration in the desalinators to reduce the drainage of hot brine and increase the water production ratio, which may cause more serious corrosion on the stainless steel components in the plants. Pitting corrosion of 316L stainless steel was studied in the concentrated environments of seawater with different temperatures (25, 50, 63, 72, 85 and 95 ℃) and concentration ratios (1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 and 3 times) by using cyclic anodic polarization measurement and SEM surface observation. The results show that both pitting potential and repassivation potential of 316L stainless steel decrease linearly with temperature in the concentration ratio range of 1 to 3 times for seawater, but the change of pitting potential is very slight when the solution temperature is higher than 85 ℃ in the case of concentration ratio larger than 2 times. Both pitting potential and repassivation potential reduce linearly with the logarithm of the concentration ratio of seawater in the range of 25 to 95 ℃. It is apparent that increasing temperature and concentration ratio of seawater will deteriorate the pitting resistance of 316L stainless steel noticeably. The influence of temperature and concentration ratio is analyzed on the basis of the point defect model. Nevertheless, the concentration ratio of seawater has a weaker influence on pitting resistance of 316L stainless steel in comparison with temperature as revealed by the pitting potential changes resulted from the concentration ratio around 1.5 times and solution temperature around 72 ℃. Therefore, compared with temperature, the corrosion resistance of 316L stainless steel for low temperature MED plants may be relatively tolerant of the adjustment or fluctuation of seawater concentration.

Key wordsstainless steel    pitting corrosion    concentrated seawater    temperature
收稿日期: 2013-06-07     
ZTFLH:  TG 172  
基金资助:*国家自然科学基金资助项目51134010
作者简介: null

辛森森, 男, 1985年生, 博士生

图1  
图2  
图3  
CR / time p / (mV·℃-1) EP0 / mV r / (mV·℃-1) ER0 / mV
1 3.77 472.4 3.14 182.8
1.5 4.44 468.1 3.24 148.7
2 4.02 420.4 3.31 144.9
2.5 3.71 391.9 3.09 103.9
3 3.87 376.9 3.27 115.4
  
图4  
图5  
Temperature / oC p / mV EP0 / mV r / mV ER0 / mV
25 183.2 406.2 138.3 109.2
50 230.7 263.0 152.8 8.1
63 184.9 203.8 208.9 -13.6
72 237.5 198.5 158.7 -57.6
85 251.8 158.8 195.2 -78.3
95 118.1 106.7 121.3 -122.4
  
[1] Wade N W. Desalination, 1993; 93: 343
[2] Olsson J. Desalination, 2005; 183: 217
[3] Khawaji A D, Kutubkhanah I K, Wie J M. Desalination, 2008; 221: 47
[4] Budhiraja P, Fares A A. Desalination, 2008; 220: 313
[5] Al-Shammiri M, Safar M. Desalination, 1999; 126: 45
[6] Hospadaruk V, Petrocelli J V. J Electrochem Soc, 1966; 113: 878
[7] Moayed M H, Laycock N J, Newman R C. Corros Sci, 2003; 45:1203
[8] Laycock N J, Newman R C. Corros Sci, 1988; 40: 887
[9] Hong T, Nagumo M. Corros Sci, 1997; 39: 288
[10] Moretti G, Quartarone G, Tassan A, Zingales A. Mater Corros, 1993; 44: 24
[11] Tsutsumi Y, Nishikata A, Tsuru T. Corros Sci, 2007; 49: 1394
[12] Cheng X Q, Li X G, Du C W. Acta Metall Sin, 2006; 42: 299
[12] (程学群, 李晓刚, 杜翠薇. 金属学报, 2006; 42: 299)
[13] Liao J X, Jiang Y M, Wu W W, Zhong C, Li J. Acta Metall Sin, 2006; 42: 1187
[13] (廖家兴, 蒋益明, 吴玮巍, 钟 澄, 李 劲. 金属学报, 2006; 42: 1187)
[14] Yashiro H, Tanno K, Koshiyama S, Akashi K. Corrosion, 1996; 52: 109
[15] Sikora J, Sikora E, Macdonald D D. Electrochim Acta, 2000; 45: 1875
[16] Wang J H, Su C C, Szklarska-Smialowska Z. Corrosion, 1988; 44: 732
[17] Stockert L, Hunkeler F, Bohni H. Corrosion, 1985; 41: 676
[18] Wei X, Dong J H, Tong J, Zheng Z, Ke W. Acta Metall Sin, 2012; 48: 502
[18] (魏 欣, 董俊华, 佟 健, 郑 志, 柯 伟. 金属学报, 2012; 48: 502)
[19] Li M C, Zeng C L, Lin H C, Cao C N. Acta Metall Sin, 2002; 36: 1287
[19] (李谋成, 曾潮流, 林海潮, 曹楚南. 金属学报, 2002; 36: 1287)
[20] Frankel G S, Stockert L, Hunkeler F, Bohni H. Corrosion, 1987; 43: 429
[21] Hunkeler F, Frankel G S, Bohni H. Corrosion, 1987; 43: 189
[22] Malik A U, Mayan Kutty P C, Siddiqi N A, Andijani I N, Ahmed S. Corros Sci, 1992; 33: 1809
[23] Park J O, Matsch S, Bohni H. J Electrochem Soc, 2002; 149: 34
[24] Leckie H P, Uhlig H H. J Electrochem Soc, 1966; 115: 1262
[25] Macdonald D D. J Electrochem Soc, 1992; 139: 3434
[26] Macdonald D D. Electochim Acta, 2011; 56: 1761
[1] 江河, 佴启亮, 徐超, 赵晓, 姚志浩, 董建新. 镍基高温合金疲劳裂纹急速扩展敏感温度及成因[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1190-1200.
[2] 张奇亮, 王玉超, 李光达, 李先军, 黄一, 徐云泽. EH36钢在不同粒径沙砾冲击下的冲刷腐蚀耦合损伤行为[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(7): 893-904.
[3] 王法, 江河, 董建新. 高合金化GH4151合金复杂析出相演变行为[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(6): 787-796.
[4] 王滨, 牛梦超, 王威, 姜涛, 栾军华, 杨柯. Cu马氏体时效不锈钢的组织与强韧性[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(5): 636-646.
[5] 侯娟, 代斌斌, 闵师领, 刘慧, 蒋梦蕾, 杨帆. 尺寸设计对选区激光熔化304L不锈钢显微组织与性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(5): 623-635.
[6] 吴欣强, 戎利建, 谭季波, 陈胜虎, 胡小锋, 张洋鹏, 张兹瑜. Pb-Bi腐蚀Si增强型铁素体/马氏体钢和奥氏体不锈钢的研究进展[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(4): 502-512.
[7] 韩恩厚, 王俭秋. 表面状态对核电关键材料腐蚀和应力腐蚀的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(4): 513-522.
[8] 程远遥, 赵刚, 许德明, 毛新平, 李光强. 奥氏体化温度对Si-Mn钢热轧板淬火-配分处理后显微组织和力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(3): 413-423.
[9] 王迪, 贺莉丽, 王栋, 王莉, 张思倩, 董加胜, 陈立佳, 张健. Pt-Al涂层对DD413合金高温拉伸性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(3): 424-434.
[10] 夏大海, 计元元, 毛英畅, 邓成满, 祝钰, 胡文彬. 2024铝合金在模拟动态海水/大气界面环境中的局部腐蚀机制[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(2): 297-308.
[11] 常立涛. 压水堆主回路高温水中奥氏体不锈钢加工表面的腐蚀与应力腐蚀裂纹萌生:研究进展及展望[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(2): 191-204.
[12] 陈继林, 冯光宏, 马洪磊, 杨栋, 刘维. Cr-Mo微合金冷镦钢的显微组织、力学性能及强化机制[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(9): 1189-1198.
[13] 孙阳庭, 李一唯, 吴文博, 蒋益明, 李劲. CaMg掺杂下夹杂物对C70S6非调质钢点蚀行为的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(7): 895-904.
[14] 温冬辉, 姜贝贝, 王清, 李相伟, 张鹏, 张书彦. MoNb改性FeCrAl不锈钢高温组织演变和力学性能[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(7): 883-894.
[15] 李海勇, 李赛毅. Al <111>对称倾斜晶界迁移行为温度相关性的分子动力学研究[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(2): 250-256.