DZ125合金熔体超温处理过程中的弛豫现象

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1037.2009.00846

金属学报

2010, Vol. 46

Issue (6): 674-680 DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2009.00846

论文

本期目录 | 过刊浏览

DZ125合金熔体超温处理过程中的弛豫现象

王常帅; 张军; 邹敏明; 刘林; 傅恒志

西北工业大学凝固技术国家重点实验室; 西安 710072

THE RELAXATION PHENOMENON DURING MELT SUPERHEATING TREATMENT OF DZ125 ALLOY

WANG Changshuai; ZHANG Jun; ZOU Minming; LIU Lin; FU Hengzhi

State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing; Northwestern Polytechnical University; Xi’an 710072

引用本文:

王常帅张军邹敏明刘林傅恒志. DZ125合金熔体超温处理过程中的弛豫现象[J]. 金属学报, 2010, 46(6): 674-680.
, , , , . THE RELAXATION PHENOMENON DURING MELT SUPERHEATING TREATMENT OF DZ125 ALLOY[J]. Acta Metall Sin, 2010, 46(6): 674-680.

全文: PDF(2480 KB)

摘要:

采用熔体超温处理方法考察了DZ125定向凝固镍基高温合金熔体超温处理中的弛豫现象. 结果表明: DZ125合金熔体超温处理中存在的弛豫现象对凝固组织有明显影响. 当恒温静置时间小于30 min时, 枝晶间距、偏析比、γ'相和γ+γ'共晶相的形貌及大小随恒温静置时间的增加均无明显变化. 然而, 进一步延长熔体恒温静置时间至60 min, 枝晶间距增大、偏析加重、γ+γ'共晶相明显增大、枝晶间γ'相明显粗化. 碳化物形貌以块状和非连续棒状为主, 且随恒温静置时间的延长无明显变化. 造成这种现象的主要原因是合金熔体结构的平衡需要一定的弛豫时间, 恒温静置时间小于30 min时, 熔体结构随静置时间的延长变化不大, 进一步延长恒温静置时间至60 min熔体结构变化明显. 熔体结构的变化将影响凝固过程及最终的凝固组织. 因此, 随熔体恒温静置时间延长凝固组织发生明显变化.

关键词 ：镍基高温合金, 熔体超温处理, 弛豫现象, 凝固组织

Abstract：

As a precipitation hardened unidirectionally solidified Ni-based superalloy, DZ125 has been extensively applied as structural materials in advanced aeroengine for gas turbine blades and vanes operating at elevated temperatures. The solidification microstructure of alloy plays an important role in determining the alloy's mechanical properties. For a given alloy, the thermal history of alloy melt has an obvious influence on the final solidification microstructure. However, previous researches mainly focused on melt superheating temperature. There are few investigations about the influence of the relaxation process of alloy melt on the solidification structure. In this paper, under the same conditions of processing parameters, e.g., olid/liquid interface temperature gradient, withdrawing velocity, by changing the melt holding time, the relaxation phenomenon during melt superheating treatment of DZ125 was investigated. The melt was superheated to 1650 ℃ and kept for 30 min, and then it was rapidly cooled down to 1500 ℃. In order to study the relaxation phenomenon during melt superheating treatment, the melt was held for 15, 30 and 60 min, respectively, and then was withdrawn into the Ga-In-Sn liquid metal bath at a rate of 50 μm/s. The results show that dendrite arm spacing, segregation ratios, size and morphology of γ' phase and γ+γ' eutectic did not change with the increase of the holding time when melt holding time was less than 30 min. But, when melt holding time was prolonged to 60 min, the dendrite arm spacing, γ+γ' eutectic and the size of γ' phase in interdendrite area increased, and the segregation becomes serious, but the γ' phase on dendrite trunk was lightly refined. The morphology of MC carbide mainly showed disconnected blocky and nodule, and unchanged with the prolongation of holding time. These changes in solidification structure should be primarily attributed to the influence of relaxation process on melt structure. When the melt holding time was less than 30 min, there was no evidently change in melt structure. But, further prolonging melt holding time to 60 min, the melt structure had obvious variation. This variation affected the solidification processing and finally solidification structure. Therefore, the variation of melt holding time resulted in the change of solidification structure.

Key words： Ni-based superalloy melt superheating treatment relaxation solidification structure

收稿日期: 2009-12-18

基金资助:

国家自然科学基金项目50931004, 国家重点基础研究发展计划项目2006CB605202和2010CB631202以及国家高技术研究发展计划项目2007AA03Z552资助

作者简介: 王常帅, 男, 1983年生, 博士生

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王常帅
	邹敏明
	张军
	傅恒志
	刘林
44.8K

链接本文:

https://www.ams.org.cn/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1037.2009.00846 或 https://www.ams.org.cn/CN/Y2010/V46/I6/674

[1] Li L, Overfelt R A. J Mater Sci, 2002; 37: 3521
[2] Gui Z L. Aviat Product Eng, 1995; 4: 12
(桂忠楼. 航空制造工程, 1995, 4: 12)
[3] Liu L, Huang T W, Zhang J, Fu H Z. Mater Lett, 2007; 61: 227
[4] Kolotukhin E V, Kuleshova E A, Baryshev E E, Tyagnov G V. Met Sci Heat Treat, 1995; 37: 222
[5] Zou M M, Zhang J, Liu L, Fu H Z. Acta Metall Sin, 2008; 44: 59
(邹敏明, 张军, 刘林, 傅恒志. 金属学报, 2008, 44: 59)
[6] Saucedo E, Rudolph P, Dieguez E. J Cryst Growth, 2008; 310: 2067
[7] Gu Z H, Wang H Y, Zheng N, Zha M, Jiang L L, Wang W, Jiang Q C. J Mater Sci, 2008; 43: 980
[8] Cao P, Qian M, Stjohn D H. Scr Mater, 2007; 56: 633
[9] Popel P S, Calvo–Dahlborg M, Dahlborg U. J Non–Cryst Solids, 2007; 353: 3243
[10] Yin F S, Sun X F, Li J G, Gun H R, Hu Z Q. Scr Mater, 2003; 48: 425
[11] Zhang J, Li B, Zou M M, Wang C S, Liu L, Fu H Z. J Alloys Compd, 2009; 484: 753
[12] Cai Y W, Fan X H, Li J G, Fu H Z. J Northwestern Polytech Univ, 1996; 14: 323
(蔡英文, 范新会, 李建国, 傅恒志. 西北工业大学学报, 1996; 14: 323)
[13] Mao X M, Fu H Z, Zhou Y H. J Northwestern Polytech Univ, 1985; 3: 11
(毛协民, 傅恒志, 周尧和. 西北工业大学学报, 1985; 3: 11)
[14] Volkert C A, Spaepen F. Mater Sci Eng, 1988; 97: 449
[15] Maslov V V, Lad’yanov V I, Ilinsky A G, Nosenko V K. J Phys Conf Ser, 2008; 98: 072007
[16] Adam G, Gibbs J H. J Chem Phys, 1965; 43: 139
[17] Fredriksson H, Fredriksson E. Mater Sci Eng, 2005; A413–414: 455
[18] Zou M M, Zhang J, Liu L, Fu H Z. Mater Sci Technol, 2008; 16: 86
(邹敏明, 张军, 刘林, 傅恒志. 材料科学与工艺, 2008; 16: 86)
[19] Chen G, Yu J W, Xie F Q, Fu H Z. Acta Metall Sin, 2001; 37: 488
(陈光, 俞建伟, 谢发勤, 傅恒志. 金属学报, 2001; 37: 488)
[20] Zhang J, Yang M, Wang C S, Liu L, Fu H Z. Foundry Technol, 2009; 9: 1108
(张军, 杨敏, 王常帅, 刘林, 傅恒志. 铸造技术, 2009; 9: 1108)
[21] Gunduz M, C¸ ad?rl? E. Mater Sci Eng, 2002; A327: 167
[22] Flemings M C. Metall Trans, 1974; 5: 2121
[23] Geng X G, Chen G, Fu H Z. Acta Metall Sin, 2002; 38:225
(耿兴国, 陈光, 傅恒志. 金属学报, 2002; 38: 225)
[24] Li R S. Non–Equilibrium Thermodynamics and Dissipation Structure. Beijing: Tsinghua Universsity Press, 1986:55
(李如生. 非平衡态热力学和耗散结构. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 1986: 55)
[25] Yin F S, Sun X F, Guan H R, Hu Z Q. J Alloys Compd, 2004, 364: 225

[1]	王磊, 刘梦雅, 刘杨, 宋秀, 孟凡强. 镍基高温合金表面冲击强化机制及应用研究进展[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1173-1189.
[2]	江河, 佴启亮, 徐超, 赵晓, 姚志浩, 董建新. 镍基高温合金疲劳裂纹急速扩展敏感温度及成因[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1190-1200.
[3]	郑亮, 张强, 李周, 张国庆. 增/降氧过程对高温合金粉末表面特性和合金性能的影响：粉末存储到脱气处理[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1265-1278.
[4]	马德新, 赵运兴, 徐维台, 王富. 重力对高温合金定向凝固组织的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(9): 1279-1290.
[5]	穆亚航, 张雪, 陈梓名, 孙晓峰, 梁静静, 李金国, 周亦胄. 基于热力学计算与机器学习的增材制造镍基高温合金裂纹敏感性预测模型[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(8): 1075-1086.
[6]	张禄, 余志伟, 张磊成, 江荣, 宋迎东. GH4169高温合金热机械疲劳循环损伤机理及数值模拟[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(7): 871-883.
[7]	袁江淮, 王振玉, 马冠水, 周广学, 程晓英, 汪爱英. Cr₂AlC涂层相结构演变对力学性能的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(7): 961-968.
[8]	刘来娣, 丁彪, 任维丽, 钟云波, 王晖, 王秋良. DZ445镍基高温合金高温长时间氧化形成的多层膜结构[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(3): 387-398.
[9]	于少霞, 王麒, 邓想涛, 王昭东. GH3600镍基高温合金极薄带的制备及尺寸效应[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(10): 1365-1375.
[10]	祝国梁, 孔德成, 周文哲, 贺戬, 董安平, 疏达, 孙宝德. 选区激光熔化 γ' 相强化镍基高温合金裂纹形成机理与抗裂纹设计研究进展[J]. 金属学报, 2023, 59(1): 16-30.
[11]	郭东伟, 郭坤辉, 张福利, 张飞, 曹江海, 侯自兵. 基于二次枝晶间距变化特征的连铸方坯CET位置判断新方法[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(6): 827-836.
[12]	吴国华, 童鑫, 蒋锐, 丁文江. 铸造Mg-RE合金晶粒细化行为研究现状与展望[J]. 金属学报, 2022, 58(4): 385-399.
[13]	曹江海, 侯自兵, 郭中傲, 郭东伟, 唐萍. 过热度对轴承钢凝固组织整体形貌特征及渗透率的影响[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(5): 586-594.
[14]	朱玉平, 盛乃成, 谢君, 王振江, 荀淑玲, 于金江, 李金国, 杨林, 侯桂臣, 周亦胄, 孙晓峰. 高钨镍基高温合金K416B富W相的析出行为[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(2): 215-223.
[15]	刘超, 姚志浩, 江河, 董建新. GH4720Li合金毫米级粗大晶粒热变形获得均匀等轴晶粒的可行性及工艺控制[J]. 金属学报, 2021, 57(10): 1309-1319.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed